IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [Tools-discuss] An IETF version of doodle ?

Ray Pelletier <rpelletier@isoc.org> Wed, 22 May 2013 14:59 UTC

Return-Path: <rpelletier@isoc.org>
X-Original-To: tools-discuss@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: tools-discuss@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 092FD21F8521 for <tools-discuss@ietfa.amsl.com>; Wed, 22 May 2013 07:59:53 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -102.192
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-102.192 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[AWL=0.407, BAYES_00=-2.599, USER_IN_WHITELIST=-100]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([12.22.58.30]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id a8Ijw6W84izY for <tools-discuss@ietfa.amsl.com>; Wed, 22 May 2013 07:59:49 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from smtp118.ord1c.emailsrvr.com (smtp118.ord1c.emailsrvr.com [108.166.43.118]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id E3A9921F8517 for <tools-discuss@ietf.org>; Wed, 22 May 2013 07:59:48 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from localhost (localhost.localdomain [127.0.0.1]) by smtp7.relay.ord1c.emailsrvr.com (SMTP Server) with ESMTP id 786ED1B80F9; Wed, 22 May 2013 10:59:48 -0400 (EDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: OK
Received: by smtp7.relay.ord1c.emailsrvr.com (Authenticated sender: rpelletier-AT-isoc.org) with ESMTPSA id 417891B80C0; Wed, 22 May 2013 10:59:48 -0400 (EDT)
Mime-Version: 1.0 (Apple Message framework v1085)
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
From: Ray Pelletier <rpelletier@isoc.org>
In-Reply-To: <C5E08FE080ACFD4DAE31E4BDBF944EB11350AB1F@xmb-aln-x02.cisco.com>
Date: Wed, 22 May 2013 10:59:47 -0400
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Message-Id: <23B81B11-A5C6-4DEE-9880-73DE1D040E95@isoc.org>
References: <C5E08FE080ACFD4DAE31E4BDBF944EB11350AB1F@xmb-aln-x02.cisco.com>
To: "Cullen Jennings (fluffy)" <fluffy@cisco.com>
X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.1085)
Cc: "tools-discuss@ietf.org" <tools-discuss@ietf.org>
Subject: Re: [Tools-discuss] An IETF version of doodle ?
X-BeenThere: tools-discuss@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.12
Precedence: list
List-Id: IETF Tools Discussion <tools-discuss.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/tools-discuss>, <mailto:tools-discuss-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/tools-discuss>
List-Post: <mailto:tools-discuss@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:tools-discuss-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/tools-discuss>, <mailto:tools-discuss-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 22 May 2013 14:59:53 -0000

On May 22, 2013, at 10:13 AM, Cullen Jennings (fluffy) wrote:

> 
> Doodle sucks at time zone. Time zones are sort of important for scheduling IETF meetings.

I've not experienced that problem when you select time zone at Doodle.

> I hate that Doodle does not show how long the proposed meeting is. 

That would be nice.
Probably easy for them to do if the suggestion were made

> 
> It seems like it would be a good 1 day hacking project at a code sprint to make an IETF tool for scheduling interim meetings that could replace doodle. 

Or have Doodle improve their product.

Ray

> 
> 
> _______________________________________________
> Tools-discuss mailing list
> Tools-discuss@ietf.org
> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/tools-discuss

v2.14.0 | Report a Bug | By Email