IETF Logo Mail Archive

[Tools-discuss] Re: PDF [Re: Tools team meeting tomorrow 9 July 2024 1800 UTC]

Dave Lawrence <tale@dd.org> Tue, 09 July 2024 13:53 UTC

Return-Path: <tale@dd.org>
X-Original-To: tools-discuss@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: tools-discuss@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6BD98C1516EB; Tue, 9 Jul 2024 06:53:48 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.909
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.909 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, RCVD_IN_ZEN_BLOCKED_OPENDNS=0.001, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001, T_SCC_BODY_TEXT_LINE=-0.01] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([50.223.129.194]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 055R7EkPFPsP; Tue, 9 Jul 2024 06:53:48 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from fluff.twonth.com (fluff.twonth.com [45.79.143.238]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits) key-exchange X25519 server-signature RSA-PSS (2048 bits) server-digest SHA256) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id E4C97C15199D; Tue, 9 Jul 2024 06:53:47 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from gro.dd.org (c-76-23-204-191.hsd1.vt.comcast.net [76.23.204.191]) by fluff.twonth.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 845B71FC5B; Tue, 9 Jul 2024 13:53:46 +0000 (UTC)
Received: by gro.dd.org (Postfix, from userid 102) id 2D0045225F; Tue, 09 Jul 2024 09:53:46 -0400 (EDT)
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Message-ID: <26253.16618.163232.346295@gro.dd.org>
Date: Tue, 09 Jul 2024 09:53:46 -0400
From: Dave Lawrence <tale@dd.org>
To: tools-discuss <tools-discuss@ietf.org>, Working Chairs <wgchairs@ietf.org>
In-Reply-To: <A757BF99-2FC1-41FD-9D8E-D1388C798606@tzi.org>
References: <336856cc-9986-43ba-bc26-f5c96aaa9521@nostrum.com> <A4157066-C7BA-4560-812A-21DB8A063AC4@tzi.org> <A335A99C-F06B-479B-BF33-10137A58DDFA@eggert.org> <A757BF99-2FC1-41FD-9D8E-D1388C798606@tzi.org>
Message-ID-Hash: RJSCTG6KQI5ZT3W2WMJW7KW4VY7JJFLT
X-Message-ID-Hash: RJSCTG6KQI5ZT3W2WMJW7KW4VY7JJFLT
X-MailFrom: tale@dd.org
X-Mailman-Rule-Misses: dmarc-mitigation; no-senders; approved; emergency; loop; banned-address; member-moderation; header-match-tools-discuss.ietf.org-0; nonmember-moderation; administrivia; implicit-dest; max-recipients; max-size; news-moderation; no-subject; digests; suspicious-header
X-Mailman-Version: 3.3.9rc4
Precedence: list
Subject: [Tools-discuss] Re: PDF [Re: Tools team meeting tomorrow 9 July 2024 1800 UTC]
List-Id: IETF Tools Discussion <tools-discuss.ietf.org>
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/tools-discuss/Tu_plU04YeSSuC7lstzPnK09v3c>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/tools-discuss>
List-Help: <mailto:tools-discuss-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Owner: <mailto:tools-discuss-owner@ietf.org>
List-Post: <mailto:tools-discuss@ietf.org>
List-Subscribe: <mailto:tools-discuss-join@ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <mailto:tools-discuss-leave@ietf.org>

Carsten Bormann writes:
> > I have a more radical proposal: Stop PDFing completely,
> 
> I don't think we should do that as long as PDF is one of the
> presentation forms we get of an RFC. (And we shouldn’t stop that
> either, but that is an RSWG issue.) 

I'm with Lars on the basic sentiment, and would really like to hear
what value it is providing that is worth the effort.  How much
meaningful use do these PDF RFCs even get?

v2.35.0 | Report a Bug | By Email | System Status