[Tools-discuss] Re: Thinking about Projection Screens in IETF meetings

Ben Campbell <ben@nostrum.com> Thu, 25 July 2024 20:04 UTC

Return-Path: <ben@nostrum.com>
X-Original-To: tools-discuss@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: tools-discuss@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 186A0C207965 for <tools-discuss@ietfa.amsl.com>; Thu, 25 Jul 2024 13:04:23 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: 1.404
X-Spam-Level: *
X-Spam-Status: No, score=1.404 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_ADSP_DISCARD=1.8, DKIM_INVALID=0.1, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, KHOP_HELO_FCRDNS=0.399, MIME_HTML_ONLY=0.1, MIME_HTML_ONLY_MULTI=0.001, MIME_QP_LONG_LINE=0.001, MPART_ALT_DIFF=0.79, T_SCC_BODY_TEXT_LINE=-0.01, T_SPF_HELO_PERMERROR=0.01, T_SPF_PERMERROR=0.01, URIBL_DBL_BLOCKED_OPENDNS=0.001, URIBL_ZEN_BLOCKED_OPENDNS=0.001] autolearn=no autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=fail (1024-bit key) reason="fail (message has been altered)" header.d=nostrum.com
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([50.223.129.194]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 3E3XCjvWaKgD for <tools-discuss@ietfa.amsl.com>; Thu, 25 Jul 2024 13:04:19 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from nostrum.com (raven-v6.nostrum.com [IPv6:2001:470:d:1130::1]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits) key-exchange X25519 server-signature RSA-PSS (2048 bits) server-digest SHA256) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 52EDEC151095 for <tools-discuss@ietf.org>; Thu, 25 Jul 2024 13:03:58 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from smtpclient.apple (dhcp-9413.meeting.ietf.org [31.133.148.19]) (authenticated bits=0) by nostrum.com (8.18.1/8.18.1) with ESMTPSA id 46PK3sNN010315 (version=TLSv1.3 cipher=TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 bits=256 verify=NO); Thu, 25 Jul 2024 15:03:54 -0500 (CDT) (envelope-from ben@nostrum.com)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=simple/simple; d=nostrum.com; s=default; t=1721937835; bh=ijmy4jbvxlsQEXDNEnEo5xOWgI0xhRqx5jIjh6OlFc0=; h=From:Subject:Date:References:Cc:In-Reply-To:To; b=tvo3i2n20t/J5mvEkFXPC+7/O5ffu5VibSLlpcBGqtFbqVI5hofD9zIdoppJ+U4VK ZthXei+MRQV1vKjPfP027E30fOLLyDuE+WP98XHiRaSS+CQpnTRl5aVJOSrwTb88Km oMlVF9n118gBGJjvV2TynUtooFdJMQ1yYs54AQEs=
X-Authentication-Warning: raven.nostrum.com: Host dhcp-9413.meeting.ietf.org [31.133.148.19] claimed to be smtpclient.apple
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="Apple-Mail-4E44906F-4057-422C-B177-1048A785B827"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
From: Ben Campbell <ben@nostrum.com>
Mime-Version: 1.0 (1.0)
Date: Thu, 25 Jul 2024 13:03:38 -0700
Message-Id: <F2669198-003A-4C8F-9A07-743BC5E3D1A0@nostrum.com>
References: <cd38f206-c80a-4567-b44d-16120f8d884d@nostrum.com>
In-Reply-To: <cd38f206-c80a-4567-b44d-16120f8d884d@nostrum.com>
To: Robert Sparks <rjsparks@nostrum.com>
X-Mailer: iPad Mail (21F90)
Message-ID-Hash: HXN7NOXAYAKWE4MKVCBCIPBCJ2NKVQFW
X-Message-ID-Hash: HXN7NOXAYAKWE4MKVCBCIPBCJ2NKVQFW
X-MailFrom: ben@nostrum.com
X-Mailman-Rule-Misses: dmarc-mitigation; no-senders; approved; emergency; loop; banned-address; member-moderation; header-match-tools-discuss.ietf.org-0; nonmember-moderation; administrivia; implicit-dest; max-recipients; max-size; news-moderation; no-subject; digests; suspicious-header
CC: "Livingood, Jason" <Jason_Livingood=40comcast.com@dmarc.ietf.org>, Tools Discussion <tools-discuss@ietf.org>
X-Mailman-Version: 3.3.9rc4
Precedence: list
Subject: [Tools-discuss] Re: Thinking about Projection Screens in IETF meetings
List-Id: IETF Tools Discussion <tools-discuss.ietf.org>
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/tools-discuss/UugyrwnXXin0Lqv8T4ubA42iQpk>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/tools-discuss>
List-Help: <mailto:tools-discuss-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Owner: <mailto:tools-discuss-owner@ietf.org>
List-Post: <mailto:tools-discuss@ietf.org>
List-Subscribe: <mailto:tools-discuss-join@ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <mailto:tools-discuss-leave@ietf.org>



On Jul 25, 2024, at 10:43 AM, Robert Sparks <rjsparks@nostrum.com> wrote:




On 7/25/24 10:31 AM, Ted Lemon wrote:
Ironically, if you are sitting up front, that QR code is the only way you can sign the blue sheet,
Well, not the only way - you can still join the session from the agenda.

+1. This is the way.  

(I don’t think I’ve scanned a meeting QR code since Philadelphia.)

and if you forget to do it at the beginning, it's nice if it's still there later. But I do agree that it feels like not the best use of screen real estate.

On Thu, Jul 25, 2024 at 10:24 AM Livingood, Jason <jason_livingood=40comcast.com@dmarc.ietf.org> wrote:

Good idea on making better use of screens, Bob. I had a similar thought yesterday as I started at a giant QR code in a WG meeting.

 

Jason

<trim/>
-----------------------------------------------
Tools-discuss mailing list -- tools-discuss@ietf.org
To unsubscribe send an email to tools-discuss-leave@ietf.org
https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/tools-discuss/" rel="noreferrer nofollow" target="_blank" class="moz-txt-link-freetext">https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/tools-discuss/

-----------------------------------------------
Tools-discuss mailing list -- tools-discuss@ietf.org
To unsubscribe send an email to tools-discuss-leave@ietf.org
https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/tools-discuss/" rel="nofollow">https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/tools-discuss/
-----------------------------------------------
Tools-discuss mailing list -- tools-discuss@ietf.org
To unsubscribe send an email to tools-discuss-leave@ietf.org
https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/tools-discuss/