Re: [Tools-discuss] An IETF version of doodle ?

"Cullen Jennings (fluffy)" <fluffy@cisco.com> Thu, 06 June 2013 02:42 UTC

Return-Path: <fluffy@cisco.com>
X-Original-To: tools-discuss@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: tools-discuss@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id BECB921F90F4 for <tools-discuss@ietfa.amsl.com>; Wed, 5 Jun 2013 19:42:25 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -108
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-108 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[RCVD_IN_DNSWL_HI=-8, USER_IN_WHITELIST=-100]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([12.22.58.30]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id TxQHLKk9fhq2 for <tools-discuss@ietfa.amsl.com>; Wed, 5 Jun 2013 19:42:20 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from rcdn-iport-9.cisco.com (rcdn-iport-9.cisco.com [173.37.86.80]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id E4D8D21F90EF for <tools-discuss@ietf.org>; Wed, 5 Jun 2013 19:42:19 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=cisco.com; i=@cisco.com; l=810; q=dns/txt; s=iport; t=1370486540; x=1371696140; h=from:to:cc:subject:date:message-id:references: in-reply-to:content-id:content-transfer-encoding: mime-version; bh=zJyTKilIt6tffXL12IIOnlKB5b5G+g5wNEwH9f8OvDI=; b=F/Xc69h1ZCTjGaEke1PWcC7pk1ks94BXp9AvtReR6l4gjQ+8EgRIs2Qg tQmnItCDv5n9s3vX96yFjLaYO6e5wJrnxHdRvdkrnTWpvBB6EshVU+e12 RlLFE/BYzYp52DxnorFe1unOhvSBostaLeXV+U1whCVUwSNmPujb2CNMg 0=;
X-IronPort-Anti-Spam-Filtered: true
X-IronPort-Anti-Spam-Result: AogFAL/2r1GtJXG8/2dsb2JhbABZgwmDJbxOfhZ0giMBAQEDATo/EAIBCA4KChQQMiUCBA4FCId/BrxAjWmBDwIxB4J6YQOof4MPgXE2
X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="4.87,811,1363132800"; d="scan'208";a="216392076"
Received: from rcdn-core2-1.cisco.com ([173.37.113.188]) by rcdn-iport-9.cisco.com with ESMTP; 06 Jun 2013 02:42:19 +0000
Received: from xhc-aln-x04.cisco.com (xhc-aln-x04.cisco.com [173.36.12.78]) by rcdn-core2-1.cisco.com (8.14.5/8.14.5) with ESMTP id r562gJ3U013778 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=AES128-SHA bits=128 verify=FAIL); Thu, 6 Jun 2013 02:42:19 GMT
Received: from xmb-aln-x02.cisco.com ([169.254.5.36]) by xhc-aln-x04.cisco.com ([173.36.12.78]) with mapi id 14.02.0318.004; Wed, 5 Jun 2013 21:42:19 -0500
From: "Cullen Jennings (fluffy)" <fluffy@cisco.com>
To: Ray Pelletier <rpelletier@isoc.org>
Thread-Topic: [Tools-discuss] An IETF version of doodle ?
Thread-Index: AQHOYl92VVZJ5WJVmEWMFGgaqZI/zA==
Date: Thu, 06 Jun 2013 02:41:52 +0000
Message-ID: <C5E08FE080ACFD4DAE31E4BDBF944EB1135512CB@xmb-aln-x02.cisco.com>
References: <C5E08FE080ACFD4DAE31E4BDBF944EB11350AB1F@xmb-aln-x02.cisco.com> <23B81B11-A5C6-4DEE-9880-73DE1D040E95@isoc.org>
In-Reply-To: <23B81B11-A5C6-4DEE-9880-73DE1D040E95@isoc.org>
Accept-Language: en-US
Content-Language: en-US
X-MS-Has-Attach:
X-MS-TNEF-Correlator:
x-originating-ip: [10.70.233.131]
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
Content-ID: <2734A666E51C8A438CF6837A68953A31@emea.cisco.com>
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
MIME-Version: 1.0
Cc: "tools-discuss@ietf.org" <tools-discuss@ietf.org>
Subject: Re: [Tools-discuss] An IETF version of doodle ?
X-BeenThere: tools-discuss@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.12
Precedence: list
List-Id: IETF Tools Discussion <tools-discuss.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/tools-discuss>, <mailto:tools-discuss-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/tools-discuss>
List-Post: <mailto:tools-discuss@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:tools-discuss-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/tools-discuss>, <mailto:tools-discuss-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 06 Jun 2013 02:42:25 -0000

On May 22, 2013, at 9:59 PM, Ray Pelletier <rpelletier@isoc.org> wrote:

> 
> On May 22, 2013, at 10:13 AM, Cullen Jennings (fluffy) wrote:
> 
>> 
>> Doodle sucks at time zone. Time zones are sort of important for scheduling IETF meetings.
> 
> I've not experienced that problem when you select time zone at Doodle.
> 
>> I hate that Doodle does not show how long the proposed meeting is. 
> 
> That would be nice.
> Probably easy for them to do if the suggestion were made
> 
>> 
>> It seems like it would be a good 1 day hacking project at a code sprint to make an IETF tool for scheduling interim meetings that could replace doodle. 
> 
> Or have Doodle improve their product.


Ray - that is an excellent point. I sent doodle some email with details.