Re: [Tools-discuss] An IETF version of doodle ?
Michael Richardson <mcr+ietf@sandelman.ca> Thu, 23 May 2013 18:34 UTC
Return-Path: <mcr@sandelman.ca>
X-Original-To: tools-discuss@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: tools-discuss@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0D58621F9425 for <tools-discuss@ietfa.amsl.com>; Thu, 23 May 2013 11:34:17 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2.599
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.599 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-2.599]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([12.22.58.30]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id LsEkY-kac8VA for <tools-discuss@ietfa.amsl.com>; Thu, 23 May 2013 11:34:02 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from tuna.sandelman.ca (tuna.sandelman.ca [209.87.252.184]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id C66E821F854E for <tools-discuss@ietf.org>; Thu, 23 May 2013 11:13:56 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from sandelman.ca (desk.marajade.sandelman.ca [209.87.252.247]) by tuna.sandelman.ca (Postfix) with ESMTP id DB0042016F for <tools-discuss@ietf.org>; Thu, 23 May 2013 14:26:05 -0400 (EDT)
Received: by sandelman.ca (Postfix, from userid 179) id A397363A7E; Thu, 23 May 2013 14:13:11 -0400 (EDT)
Received: from sandelman.ca (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by sandelman.ca (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9337463A7C for <tools-discuss@ietf.org>; Thu, 23 May 2013 14:13:11 -0400 (EDT)
From: Michael Richardson <mcr+ietf@sandelman.ca>
To: "tools-discuss@ietf.org" <tools-discuss@ietf.org>
In-Reply-To: <23B81B11-A5C6-4DEE-9880-73DE1D040E95@isoc.org>
References: <C5E08FE080ACFD4DAE31E4BDBF944EB11350AB1F@xmb-aln-x02.cisco.com> <23B81B11-A5C6-4DEE-9880-73DE1D040E95@isoc.org>
X-Mailer: MH-E 8.3; nmh 1.3-dev; XEmacs 21.4 (patch 22)
X-Face: $\n1pF)h^`}$H>Hk{L"x@)JS7<%Az}5RyS@k9X%29-lHB$Ti.V>2bi.~ehC0; <'$9xN5Ub# z!G,p`nR&p7Fz@^UXIn156S8.~^@MJ*mMsD7=QFeq%AL4m<nPbLgmtKK-5dC@#:k
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: multipart/signed; boundary="=-=-="; micalg="pgp-sha1"; protocol="application/pgp-signature"
Date: Thu, 23 May 2013 14:13:11 -0400
Message-ID: <27284.1369332791@sandelman.ca>
Sender: mcr@sandelman.ca
Subject: Re: [Tools-discuss] An IETF version of doodle ?
X-BeenThere: tools-discuss@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.12
Precedence: list
List-Id: IETF Tools Discussion <tools-discuss.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/tools-discuss>, <mailto:tools-discuss-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/tools-discuss>
List-Post: <mailto:tools-discuss@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:tools-discuss-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/tools-discuss>, <mailto:tools-discuss-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 23 May 2013 18:34:17 -0000
>>>>> "Ray" == Ray Pelletier <rpelletier@isoc.org> writes: >> Doodle sucks at time zone. Time zones are sort of important for >> scheduling IETF meetings. Ray> I've not experienced that problem when you select time zone at Ray> Doodle. Nor have I. In most cases the situation where the time zone were wrong were: a) doodle poll creator failed to pick a zone. b) doodle poll creator had computer without time zone support, and was actually all their email and stuff was broken. >> I hate that Doodle does not show how long the proposed meeting is. Ray> That would be nice. Ray> Probably easy for them to do if the suggestion were made Yes... make a suggestion, they are really responsive people. -- ] Never tell me the odds! | ipv6 mesh networks [ ] Michael Richardson, Sandelman Software Works | network architect [ ] mcr@sandelman.ca http://www.sandelman.ca/ | ruby on rails [
- [Tools-discuss] An IETF version of doodle ? Cullen Jennings (fluffy)
- Re: [Tools-discuss] An IETF version of doodle ? Paul Hoffman
- Re: [Tools-discuss] An IETF version of doodle ? Ray Pelletier
- Re: [Tools-discuss] An IETF version of doodle ? Daniel Kahn Gillmor
- Re: [Tools-discuss] An IETF version of doodle ? Bob Hinden
- Re: [Tools-discuss] An IETF version of doodle ? Michael Richardson
- Re: [Tools-discuss] An IETF version of doodle ? Cullen Jennings (fluffy)
- Re: [Tools-discuss] An IETF version of doodle ? Cullen Jennings (fluffy)