[Tools-discuss] Re: [rfc-i] Re: Demo of the Rfc-Editor website at IETF 124
Eric Rescorla <ekr@rtfm.com> Sat, 01 November 2025 21:56 UTC
Return-Path: <ekr@rtfm.com>
X-Original-To: tools-discuss@mail2.ietf.org
Delivered-To: tools-discuss@mail2.ietf.org
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by mail2.ietf.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id DF4048032C1D for <tools-discuss@mail2.ietf.org>; Sat, 1 Nov 2025 14:56:41 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at ietf.org
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.896
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.896 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DC_PNG_UNO_LARGO=0.001, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE=-0.0001, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_NONE=0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: mail2.ietf.org (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=rtfm-com.20230601.gappssmtp.com
Received: from mail2.ietf.org ([166.84.6.31]) by localhost (mail2.ietf.org [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id SboXTJuU0Lla for <tools-discuss@mail2.ietf.org>; Sat, 1 Nov 2025 14:56:41 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mail-yw1-x1134.google.com (mail-yw1-x1134.google.com [IPv6:2607:f8b0:4864:20::1134]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_128_GCM_SHA256 (128/128 bits) key-exchange X25519 server-signature ECDSA (P-256) server-digest SHA256) (No client certificate requested) by mail2.ietf.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 0D8478032C13 for <tools-discuss@ietf.org>; Sat, 1 Nov 2025 14:56:41 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by mail-yw1-x1134.google.com with SMTP id 00721157ae682-7864ab69f01so18159767b3.3 for <tools-discuss@ietf.org>; Sat, 01 Nov 2025 14:56:41 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=rtfm-com.20230601.gappssmtp.com; s=20230601; t=1762034200; x=1762639000; darn=ietf.org; h=cc:to:subject:message-id:date:from:in-reply-to:references :mime-version:from:to:cc:subject:date:message-id:reply-to; bh=7uMpBFM9FZJrtzHuNbroHyJUSvX2RFNiI0k3UHv5snA=; b=uUMIgzc1Zn/o98r4hrXJpsqldMGtUs/8jeYiZNdFW92WWrmJcGshOq0m6fZcNA9hwx 7NJ49Rzidz4nxH1EiCClAt0XLm0Jn2ta5zkM8PArNHh0Tyqv0BnGyQU156u7BOr/5bjP BpeWy6XbjgA/VElJ2uqDQLndRPhTBGzuKaMIyfmpbfrxYi6AfiFa9y++vT1jHgaNoEVV eOXc5tow3jxiFlvF/0Iu+hdWipBIZSLMqJZv/02nhm6JmTqpcYLAA6vh0piAuGdhCimx eppfMq01x2Dwl+i0Y9zB77ue+6I7d/2uftjL0hf05amCQ5QqRXxdqA3k0+rPgZrIdTQs KyrA==
X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20230601; t=1762034200; x=1762639000; h=cc:to:subject:message-id:date:from:in-reply-to:references :mime-version:x-gm-message-state:from:to:cc:subject:date:message-id :reply-to; bh=7uMpBFM9FZJrtzHuNbroHyJUSvX2RFNiI0k3UHv5snA=; b=T9FMi6t7D9w4AvLOLhQBGzdgQ14WSVwYtJGSNeyaDSWVrfi1Hkvnzd6g96wEkvGdS8 qwYB9pO7YMZ6pbFd2e5cSxdEnSPLbHfpkW4KX6tNuHk6xjdkpD8OOTHwq8U6Zx1PuQ9X p/jsPj3mfshuu/fszt1AIrotX8bKPyS80jO0xAxrluBUlYhaUES/HBlsvG00ndxXS3aI fNTcPO8T3AlGgL+eBLdBYvm35d1QXHNX1zOjOzVqENV1m7Y/vg0K3j6dusSZvoJXzCBP gYcdAaQOIF6Uq6LCBGp/xrCEJVF81D29LJVFkRWiur6TX28bkpWXunXqQdokezlvJu+j ba3g==
X-Gm-Message-State: AOJu0YwBBvOVapyK6FZ9Zh/dOtC0vTZjphSILcmwjgHajk1ZEXY6X/9c sElbQ0A9rqUsXJoEMzL1J1AEWiTJajhIr/ay8Fn4/5u3BrtOIzIKhsBYjJybxs0obv++6MkunVq 26P1qOOeP2TBEwt5JVqDDcMxLIWio/TF3PpL2eyqfVl+WZdncJ3xFMCI=
X-Gm-Gg: ASbGncsP0toNsoFQ28LutuZtsJU6cVzXkK5+EJWTMGQ5fTdPNf4XzssNdq/NX8+YVrw 2LuVw/z6k0TiE9Sm7aLiY2PlMoW/yX1DD0EMJdZfzMLj+BxyGhFQ8QyhFUmIpPadh5F8TXFMJBs wCFKGRKn3s8/wvIEAJv+3EW2XvldRvxekipBNmVthBH4WTAizFpEEs5y8OHY+KvGK/KC0DwDUSs 42gnktKutASIAarSUKl+87qlwFV/U/dQfo1cC/A7/NFtj53Q8UGMKrryfrtewfH6VPRS6NGwuz+ y84VnzYx3k4rw+NNzJ4gUgSzTINTFHUOSpopQZ0edgD2XFB13NYsDe+pyM9KXcbA/W+L4XLDQe4 FoVizmhwo+w==
X-Google-Smtp-Source: AGHT+IF8ZT7mALKboZmzI4pIHD4GVtIEhTTnSq8lZwimB3Lq55BK9R0JbZWWGeh8OtMG4JOWJaH3u2vfyTfMnbrLWA4=
X-Received: by 2002:a05:690c:490d:b0:786:5712:46c3 with SMTP id 00721157ae682-78657124982mr45094787b3.41.1762034200022; Sat, 01 Nov 2025 14:56:40 -0700 (PDT)
MIME-Version: 1.0
References: <6f317ac4-7472-4c06-8192-8a40863a121a@nostrum.com> <8dcfe7a7-1f57-4b10-acba-9856eb0be3e0@nostrum.com> <53bb8498-5369-4488-8f7f-a399364378d2@nostrum.com>
In-Reply-To: <53bb8498-5369-4488-8f7f-a399364378d2@nostrum.com>
From: Eric Rescorla <ekr@rtfm.com>
Date: Sat, 01 Nov 2025 14:56:03 -0700
X-Gm-Features: AWmQ_bmE1UGxG9lmisCm2-HknfEHO2OTLmCWgoN76hRtBMIoZ8Z-wskJ5Bj3a9s
Message-ID: <CABcZeBPX--kFr4bkNv2=WqT_o-JDbKuk32O_UwswFDgQqcPv3Q@mail.gmail.com>
To: Tools Team Discussion <tools-discuss@ietf.org>
Content-Type: multipart/related; boundary="0000000000009354fe06428f8e2c"
Message-ID-Hash: ANBU7UYFFE3E24BVJB3EUJXTNDPQPD6G
X-Message-ID-Hash: ANBU7UYFFE3E24BVJB3EUJXTNDPQPD6G
X-MailFrom: ekr@rtfm.com
X-Mailman-Rule-Misses: dmarc-mitigation; no-senders; approved; emergency; loop; banned-address; member-moderation; header-match-tools-discuss.ietf.org-0; nonmember-moderation; administrivia; implicit-dest; max-recipients; max-size; news-moderation; no-subject; digests; suspicious-header
CC: 124attendees@ietf.org, rfc-interest <rfc-interest@rfc-editor.org>
X-Mailman-Version: 3.3.9rc6
Precedence: list
Subject: [Tools-discuss] Re: [rfc-i] Re: Demo of the Rfc-Editor website at IETF 124
List-Id: IETF Tools Discussion <tools-discuss.ietf.org>
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/tools-discuss/WAFtAj-Xc-YOB4KjZgV-MxNXA4I>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/tools-discuss>
List-Help: <mailto:tools-discuss-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Owner: <mailto:tools-discuss-owner@ietf.org>
List-Post: <mailto:tools-discuss@ietf.org>
List-Subscribe: <mailto:tools-discuss-join@ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <mailto:tools-discuss-leave@ietf.org>
Robert, Thanks for putting this together. I took an initial look and I've found some issues and wanted to get a sense of how best to engage. In particular, when I click on the GitHub link to report issues [0] I see that there are only three open issues, but there are other things missing that it seems the team knows about. For instance this appears on the errata page: [image: image.png] There are also other things that don't seem to work but are not flagged with TODOs (e.g., missing errata on RFCs which have errata). Is there some project plan or issues list etc. that we can refer to to see what is supposed to work and what is known not to? -Ekr [0] https://github.com/ietf-tools/red-beta/issues On Sat, Nov 1, 2025 at 1:34 PM Robert Sparks <rjsparks@nostrum.com> wrote: > In addition to the in-person demos at the RFC Editor and Tools Team > desks this week, a snapshot of the work in progress for the new RFC > Editor website is available for browsing at > https://www-beta.rfc-editor.org. > > If you have feedback, please send it to tools-discuss@ietf.org, open an > issue at https://github.com/ietf-tools/red-beta/issues or come talk to > us at the desks. > > A couple of things to keep in mind while looking through this snapshot: > > It is taking data from a development instance of the datatracker, which > is serving as a temporary stand-in for the data that will come from the > new RPC database under development. That instance's data is not being > updated during the week, so any RFCs published during the week will not > appear there. > > The datatracker has slightly different author information than the > authoritative RPC database, so you will see differences with author > names. This will be resolved - the datatracker and the RPC database will > have the same data about authors - before this new website goes into > production. > > This demo does not cover views of the queue or the errata system. Those > will be coming in the next several weeks. > > You will need to be logged to the datatracker to view the demo site. The > production website will not have this requirement. > > The demo will be taken down at the end of IETF 124. Future versions of > it are likely before we reach the production deployment, which is > expected before IETF 125. > > RjS > > On 10/15/25 1:22 PM, Robert Sparks wrote: > > Please come by the RFC Editor and Tools Team desks during IETF 124. We > > will have a preview of the rfc-editor.org website that is under > > development available for demonstration. > > > > Today's blog post at > > https://www.ietf.org/blog/rfc-editor-website-update/ has more about > > the upcoming website. > > > > RjS > > _______________________________________________ > rfc-interest mailing list -- rfc-interest@rfc-editor.org > To unsubscribe send an email to rfc-interest-leave@rfc-editor.org >
- [Tools-discuss] Demo of the Rfc-Editor website at… Robert Sparks
- [Tools-discuss] Re: Demo of the Rfc-Editor websit… Robert Sparks
- [Tools-discuss] Re: [rfc-i] Re: Demo of the Rfc-E… Eric Rescorla
- [Tools-discuss] Re: [rfc-i] Re: Demo of the Rfc-E… Alexis Rossi
- [Tools-discuss] Re: [rfc-i] Re: Demo of the Rfc-E… Eric Rescorla
- [Tools-discuss] Re: [rfc-i] Re: Demo of the Rfc-E… Robert Sparks
- [Tools-discuss] Re: [rfc-i] Re: Demo of the Rfc-E… Eric Rescorla