IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [Tools-discuss] Important dates in upcoming.ics

Robert Sparks <rjsparks@nostrum.com> Tue, 09 February 2021 21:55 UTC

Return-Path: <rjsparks@nostrum.com>
X-Original-To: tools-discuss@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: tools-discuss@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7C3BE3A0D71 for <tools-discuss@ietfa.amsl.com>; Tue, 9 Feb 2021 13:55:32 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2.08
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.08 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_EF=-0.1, NICE_REPLY_A=-0.001, T_SPF_HELO_PERMERROR=0.01, T_SPF_PERMERROR=0.01, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (1024-bit key) header.d=nostrum.com
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id nyDa0H21xQ0P for <tools-discuss@ietfa.amsl.com>; Tue, 9 Feb 2021 13:55:30 -0800 (PST)
Received: from nostrum.com (raven-v6.nostrum.com [IPv6:2001:470:d:1130::1]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 72F883A0D70 for <tools-discuss@ietf.org>; Tue, 9 Feb 2021 13:55:30 -0800 (PST)
Received: from unformal.localdomain ([47.186.1.92]) (authenticated bits=0) by nostrum.com (8.16.1/8.16.1) with ESMTPSA id 119LtSVD008815 (version=TLSv1.3 cipher=TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 bits=256 verify=NO); Tue, 9 Feb 2021 15:55:29 -0600 (CST) (envelope-from rjsparks@nostrum.com)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=simple/simple; d=nostrum.com; s=default; t=1612907729; bh=ikL04CXvKV6H+hE/PP5QD0QE9tJvomeJHQZKho+Vz+0=; h=To:Cc:References:From:Subject:Date:In-Reply-To; b=ZWmSREjdvpBxw9awc2Tu2knKq2LaP3XKzNKdWg6Uat9Shg0VM0UW54rwjUuPzKkQY g+QaJtBAHr4qCHRHl0Kj7u8Ervc2qK9+ghgqDjlhJnznbJ+fh5L0u5s5urC9om4EL7 nMZfSCnHq4J/IuMUmTCcLIlSj753kvilxKLa3qxc=
X-Authentication-Warning: raven.nostrum.com: Host [47.186.1.92] claimed to be unformal.localdomain
To: Michael Richardson <mcr+ietf@sandelman.ca>
Cc: tools-discuss@ietf.org
References: <7da79bcd-2931-4a0e-8f7e-3ba528fea0cc@nostrum.com> <20268.1612372060@localhost> <cac83fb6-2cbd-5037-e6d7-623d4e2c30b1@nostrum.com> <947.1612405162@localhost> <15ea5446-3f90-b3bf-f10e-d3e5b58592fc@nostrum.com> <28578.1612905766@localhost>
From: Robert Sparks <rjsparks@nostrum.com>
Message-ID: <f5518226-7954-6860-99ef-317f0bf88520@nostrum.com>
Date: Tue, 09 Feb 2021 15:55:23 -0600
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Macintosh; Intel Mac OS X 10.15; rv:78.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/78.7.1
MIME-Version: 1.0
In-Reply-To: <28578.1612905766@localhost>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8"; format="flowed"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Content-Language: en-US
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/tools-discuss/WjLZuS3aB9A2GzCyP2rZAa37NfY>
Subject: Re: [Tools-discuss] Important dates in upcoming.ics
X-BeenThere: tools-discuss@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: IETF Tools Discussion <tools-discuss.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/tools-discuss>, <mailto:tools-discuss-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/tools-discuss/>
List-Post: <mailto:tools-discuss@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:tools-discuss-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/tools-discuss>, <mailto:tools-discuss-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 09 Feb 2021 21:55:33 -0000

On 2/9/21 3:22 PM, Michael Richardson wrote:
> Robert Sparks <rjsparks@nostrum.com> wrote:
>      > On 2/3/21 8:19 PM, Michael Richardson wrote:
>      >> Robert Sparks <rjsparks@nostrum.com> wrote:
>      >> >> I would like it if the upcoming.ics included the IESG Telechats and
>      >> >> other related things (LLC board, RTG area meetings, etc.).
>      >>
>      >> > We could add these other things, but I think we would then need to add
>      >> > filters so people could select the information that they really want.
>      >>
>      >> > I understand the general deconflicting use case.
>      >>
>      >> > It will likely be a stretch to get LLC board meetings and the like into
>      >> > the datatracker - those are maintained in other systems.
>      >>
>      >> > Area meetings on the other hand should just be interims - are they not
>      >> > being organized that way?
>      >>
>      >> No, because not all area meetings are WGs.
>      >> IoTDIR, RtgDIR.
>
>      > These things (review teams) are already configured to support meeting. They
>      > can schedule interims just like WG/RG can. So can area groups already.
>
> I thought that the last conversation we had between you, I and Ines, that
> IoTDIR was not configured in the right way to do this. Did that change?
> Maybe we just need to remind them again.
Yes, it did - we had a round of discussion with all the review team 
chairs which was positive for making the change, and it was made in 
November. Ines engaged in the thread and acknowledged the change at the 
time.
>
>      > If you find a group type that should be able manage meetings in the
>      > datatracker, but can't yet, let me know.
>
>
> --
> Michael Richardson <mcr+IETF@sandelman.ca>   . o O ( IPv6 IøT consulting )
>             Sandelman Software Works Inc, Ottawa and Worldwide
>
>
>
>

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email