[Tools-discuss] Re: IPR for draft update in datatracker not as expected?

Robert Sparks <rjsparks@nostrum.com> Tue, 13 August 2024 16:37 UTC

Return-Path: <rjsparks@nostrum.com>
X-Original-To: tools-discuss@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: tools-discuss@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8446AC09E1CB for <tools-discuss@ietfa.amsl.com>; Tue, 13 Aug 2024 09:37:45 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -7.086
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-7.086 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_EF=-0.1, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_HI=-5, RCVD_IN_ZEN_BLOCKED_OPENDNS=0.001, T_SCC_BODY_TEXT_LINE=-0.01, T_SPF_HELO_PERMERROR=0.01, T_SPF_PERMERROR=0.01, URIBL_DBL_BLOCKED_OPENDNS=0.001, URIBL_ZEN_BLOCKED_OPENDNS=0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (1024-bit key) header.d=nostrum.com
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([50.223.129.194]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id qL3N220XnJAa for <tools-discuss@ietfa.amsl.com>; Tue, 13 Aug 2024 09:37:41 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from nostrum.com (raven-v6.nostrum.com [IPv6:2001:470:d:1130::1]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits) key-exchange X25519 server-signature ECDSA (P-256) server-digest SHA256) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id AD3BBC09C22E for <tools-discuss@ietf.org>; Tue, 13 Aug 2024 09:37:40 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from [192.168.1.102] ([47.186.48.51]) (authenticated bits=0) by nostrum.com (8.18.1/8.18.1) with ESMTPSA id 47DGbbfZ014613 (version=TLSv1.3 cipher=TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 bits=256 verify=NO); Tue, 13 Aug 2024 11:37:38 -0500 (CDT) (envelope-from rjsparks@nostrum.com)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=simple/simple; d=nostrum.com; s=default; t=1723567058; bh=3Dwcf3HwPdKxlFi405iR776zFvtm/H1yFshR+4pL/ts=; h=Date:Subject:To:References:From:In-Reply-To; b=DwYpX6qr9NNXhXyltOmm4bv4+gu3fSIgJuhpfltI+zH/zZ3UP2FtKAkyb3pY+nJvs bnTQHzI+DMD5+MV7hEMeFktoOkBThv50MnHHXrkKsVACy4aSYMb1Ld3LWmLFEJcDWc scB+O9OO6NR8oES5lAh8oSmKa0/0/B1+COlSU08s=
X-Authentication-Warning: raven.nostrum.com: Host [47.186.48.51] claimed to be [192.168.1.102]
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="------------vh6Iuyql0utHpV60Tt9Eoss3"
Message-ID: <37f1caa4-0dec-476c-8a0d-67d4645c0086@nostrum.com>
Date: Tue, 13 Aug 2024 11:37:32 -0500
MIME-Version: 1.0
User-Agent: Mozilla Thunderbird
To: tools-discuss@ietf.org, Jeffrey Haas <jhaas@pfrc.org>
References: <E2BE4986-2CBE-4A97-AEA5-3278746906A4@pfrc.org>
Content-Language: en-US
From: Robert Sparks <rjsparks@nostrum.com>
Autocrypt: addr=rjsparks@nostrum.com; keydata= xsDNBFx4PQwBDADIIJqFKIeYNmVR3iH8YnNqwApV+ci83VqFaPg0UXZAZ1utH/2O2LOLJKmV Ol11+lOSfH4OJgpARt37PWbqfG2TzzGfEucRBPMAV8TEDmzKL+7/OUMLEoPeexgxz6ADxK2Q ACKKzHhF30y4fx2fn9rYZrCvYHV9HDKcfFotNLna0U6P6wu70L0mT2hcjQgZ7+8HSZCpK2XG PTya1mEiMklH6+UHfcTLoAxd3chQiseRi19/TQZZCD3LuuaGFWyTIeF9ZNWV9yL0HQeb/XMs tmZnObSSHSUbZwn5PR9Uf+3iW7jdG5JuXBvNbDpAHfLyPXRqxErM/nCLrbwGB6AgNSKFCwkL lb3uxsGFWcOt6sedrjixoVUO2k4zQWVnCUCwFHGrgIxUK24dI8oqydGPctXAKj5VqoCVJBv6 4JxSpiR+V8fl3A8gksBUnuIMLNlRjB5RAgZaSUpaOkXsWUBA8Z75wQWoIzkJIeMm29w2l1kB B9kGMdyiXGr2JV8VQZ4lAscAEQEAAc0kUm9iZXJ0IFNwYXJrcyA8cmpzcGFya3NAbm9zdHJ1 bS5jb20+wsEUBBMBCAA+FiEEGNywdGDCHUYBwWN3bipqV3X5ExgFAmXhDnYCGwMFCQ0rmNQF CwkIBwIGFQoJCAsCBBYCAwECHgECF4AACgkQbipqV3X5ExiEpwwAknrYjNHDI2l50IC1lpQB SnmCLvuu4pEESpRaBx1Te7vZBHr740dMbKQv/ZYYekw/NfFfoq2Ptguz5BXHwtyx3hKKjBUA U/rP62bl+x77yTJ0+I5k2hJ1p1DWNqXHWK3SEM0IUvjWpMGlfXPu7iVYCBGPKBDglQ4GWpzU HmSAX/8Zww6+ZbrXM0VgA+hLSHivyHextX4mJwoLRcuY99ecvkdWwFnKoDlEsKozdv9NW+QT h1rFvAtXf2ZCGwIveAMJPbHbRY3uFVp+oMvBbP7m5teffB8Ki5kuO1Y1Wqd9UPhiVDZmUuyC PXymQErskbOB6DcNSSFH7ZHuLM4V+zyziYWTT6foBv0ynA+a3Ofxo+rKPVHLybZlO9bQcI0Q TIE8yT0oqd3kWMaMIyrKZURVUpzcDgRnx6ujckLLyAC1H8L0tuntPwZOo5PAq3P7SUiWlc0L 5HbA0L//BE6eeWn6U3xOgaJNF2+YRVICNtWpXcR3Mr4k1uXW4JkE7lyoufbnzsDNBFx4PQwB DAC03e1kk41e9Z9FuVW8UKWIkVUBeH3gfJMsb94d/c0cqBMRw5rulSY7+U76rw4AXo792LZn ydjDfoL0GQxGqkrZh397Sn9P/sLCb5I+wC14251nkmh5tmU2sQqCk+g9nykcE/NJft/zFkeb HHCKAosK6glO+W0YPHc/k7nXt/fLz7dMRpFpmqFXWjeN2VtwKr9znMg9+iX6XfgAJPMdDNH8 fn30Cp5TIsn5WCI70+JztgvfjFhD15Eb3rtDdOfOydjGCV2ZVxfM8ECmc8Z3DrThyiC2M3uo 2Y50rs6MH+TmVCtpHkISnH7B+80Vy2SC60K9l2xgCaezN1SlkQy3ZpprzcDrNTI8FcJa/UUM ayMGvSDGEGuHZRaNUyXP3jQ8oss+067axmNr5vgjpf01kmE1RJtiGEDWmCr8u1SbVQjdax6C pDqq3RKoX2ZVGLtkdDYZbsqSq4TgmFukoijWRbLxsFBdeEgruTViWRw4PKZav0piLxrhHUGI m6F6JFngapUAEQEAAcLA/AQYAQgAJhYhBBjcsHRgwh1GAcFjd24qald1+RMYBQJl4Q52AhsM BQkNK5jUAAoJEG4qald1+RMYaCML/jp+3W9OedMRVk5XQ3Urxu7g09qaeAfBAArLlE7F13Xt WuGUN7JwZ8hZt8Rsx1+Uz/Zq2TIPjl8PmgIqCSkuvZrxacr+drYARtO00Af71qHVoh4gZTae iOwEuOGhhtCVI3vvKLMDv1ex0scvD4rJTsIk/zqEDCJNDVOf09Szj0CW0vJOYxrIV0sG/UoM 7Ui5/eB4tlN5AFIXuTJzo6BzaUAJVut74Ss2i93qwtwjGw44iEqPVhqKMCDYuB9+bm13ft+H Vr7viRZobd+60NTWrfZhkpmzhb4Qiib9qXhrUoa2EXqVOIy+LMQoiwjF9/iK+5FSA18c52FP ODkDgkica826W9AnBasS6gXQr0bO1BCJu84Fp2RQcjB4IFP+sKVoN3EZTByyUKK4NnSLF3lJ /G+vQhisnuJS+e+emZ8UxZBOK8upAhrhHJj0Wju2W0uTQTxlBME0/uNsvA/KaudLNhlQiUYN 7Fl3rswvQk/iD+utnQdWJbRgIsqesNXbQCOimQ==
In-Reply-To: <E2BE4986-2CBE-4A97-AEA5-3278746906A4@pfrc.org>
Message-ID-Hash: GQHVGCG2EPQI6UGYEEMDIMYXXAGGOZ5U
X-Message-ID-Hash: GQHVGCG2EPQI6UGYEEMDIMYXXAGGOZ5U
X-MailFrom: rjsparks@nostrum.com
X-Mailman-Rule-Misses: dmarc-mitigation; no-senders; approved; emergency; loop; banned-address; member-moderation; header-match-tools-discuss.ietf.org-0; nonmember-moderation; administrivia; implicit-dest; max-recipients; max-size; news-moderation; no-subject; digests; suspicious-header
X-Mailman-Version: 3.3.9rc4
Precedence: list
Subject: [Tools-discuss] Re: IPR for draft update in datatracker not as expected?
List-Id: IETF Tools Discussion <tools-discuss.ietf.org>
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/tools-discuss/Wj_FV0FscGcVw5InVkevioeyx2I>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/tools-discuss>
List-Help: <mailto:tools-discuss-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Owner: <mailto:tools-discuss-owner@ietf.org>
List-Post: <mailto:tools-discuss@ietf.org>
List-Subscribe: <mailto:tools-discuss-join@ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <mailto:tools-discuss-leave@ietf.org>

Hi Jeff -

Yes, the search results page should be improved.

Note that IPR search page for RFC5575 says

No IPR disclosures have been submitted directly on RFC 5575 
<https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/rfc5575/>, but there are disclosures 
on a related document, listed on this page.

and the results contain the draft.

The search page for 8955 should propogate to the related documents for 
the RFCs returned.

We'll open an issue.

RjS

On 8/13/24 11:26 AM, Jeffrey Haas wrote:
> Consider the following:
>
> https://datatracker.ietf.org/ipr/search/?submit=draft&id=rfc8955 
> <https://datatracker.ietf.org/ipr/search/?submit=draft&id=rfc8955>
> https://datatracker.ietf.org/ipr/search/?submit=draft&id=rfc5575 
> <https://datatracker.ietf.org/ipr/search/?submit=draft&id=rfc5575>
>
> RFC 8955 is a -bis of RFC 5575.
>
> The 8955 IPR page says "5575 doesn't have IPR disclosures".  However, 
> you can see that 5575 absolutely has some.
>
> Is this a bug in the inheritance lookup or am I misinterpreting the 
> intent for the 8955 page's lookup vs. 5575?
>
> -- Jeff
>
>
> -----------------------------------------------
> Tools-discuss mailing list --tools-discuss@ietf.org
> To unsubscribe send an email totools-discuss-leave@ietf.org
> https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/tools-discuss/