Re: [Tools-discuss] .txt? [I-D Action: draft-xxx.txt]

Julian Reschke <julian.reschke@gmx.de> Wed, 30 June 2021 13:03 UTC

Return-Path: <julian.reschke@gmx.de>
X-Original-To: tools-discuss@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: tools-discuss@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 19BA63A1BD7 for <tools-discuss@ietfa.amsl.com>; Wed, 30 Jun 2021 06:03:14 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2.237
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.237 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, FREEMAIL_FROM=0.001, NICE_REPLY_A=-0.338, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_H2=-0.001, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (1024-bit key) header.d=gmx.net
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id UpolX_4lVsor for <tools-discuss@ietfa.amsl.com>; Wed, 30 Jun 2021 06:03:09 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mout.gmx.net (mout.gmx.net [212.227.15.19]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 1DD183A1BD6 for <tools-discuss@ietf.org>; Wed, 30 Jun 2021 06:03:08 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=gmx.net; s=badeba3b8450; t=1625058176; bh=09CV7eEVADyFrYLsj/9LSMmah0JjTQRV/HxQq8318ao=; h=X-UI-Sender-Class:Subject:To:Cc:References:From:Date:In-Reply-To; b=dc45gRRQAGfXPqn8R8st5+CtJJaaAfoWmIEj8QtGZTalpexweQwHh38yNwMoK43vD 2cW60EBhe36GfugV4/I/t4kgw0Jetl2s+dcaITtUl+UWz0OkGyPddA82GRIxFYb9pU ULIPz9WtOCTqlb4owG4XIEUepL8d5K4gzxJmKgQ4=
X-UI-Sender-Class: 01bb95c1-4bf8-414a-932a-4f6e2808ef9c
Received: from [192.168.2.149] ([80.146.124.149]) by mail.gmx.net (mrgmx005 [212.227.17.190]) with ESMTPSA (Nemesis) id 1MAfYw-1m58O025fs-00Azxs; Wed, 30 Jun 2021 15:02:56 +0200
To: Carsten Bormann <cabo@tzi.org>
Cc: tools-discuss@ietf.org
References: <20210627013258.1D30F188447C@ary.qy> <691b91b6-86d7-2a3d-b9dc-8c19cc507db4@gmail.com> <584d34d6-5630-bbb7-35cc-9459dabc80f0@taugh.com> <82887902-90d0-3616-656b-fc39e4febd47@gmail.com> <70fee53d-28b9-874a-6988-6c1234ca149@taugh.com> <20210628193815.GL5057@faui48e.informatik.uni-erlangen.de> <ffd86c27-82a0-8c92-d270-ab1c770acb99@gmail.com> <20210628234707.GM5057@faui48e.informatik.uni-erlangen.de> <b2b1a003-317b-c099-8dbc-da37738203a9@gmx.de> <20210629214106.GT5057@faui48e.informatik.uni-erlangen.de> <9000db84-7e97-fc65-03c8-e7af6d2dd71c@gmx.de> <B1047490-9D01-40F4-B1C7-BA3CF5B8CCA2@tzi.org> <e0be6976-8a2f-69eb-38e4-150d8f37f087@gmx.de> <8611d10a-690c-a890-e741-05a505920948@gmx.de> <DD43BA34-BEA5-4278-958A-013B75183EC5@tzi.org>
From: Julian Reschke <julian.reschke@gmx.de>
Message-ID: <4718f537-0b55-9f47-3a17-fe5d04c50232@gmx.de>
Date: Wed, 30 Jun 2021 15:02:56 +0200
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 10.0; Win64; x64; rv:78.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/78.11.0
MIME-Version: 1.0
In-Reply-To: <DD43BA34-BEA5-4278-958A-013B75183EC5@tzi.org>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8; format=flowed
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
X-Provags-ID: V03:K1:9NOV0Vd7XdN4mkeRy7CXkYZh4Oi0VEWh6uS0Ix25wpKYU8ObqFw JSKaEOrVNDc3/8QD82kUjJJlCwFXLiOv7rPkM09UbEIjEBooyETcHpywrbgpJ3G8C4NXq7S YDEcN5Wu//ZgYSMVTOSSzjCC7G2lNqTOZG6AFjY/gOdKSmYFprpPxcDnpBWvV/2zr+Zh8yl /1K3fno0ZFmijWijhxbtw==
X-UI-Out-Filterresults: notjunk:1;V03:K0:FkMhcVAIqxA=:3yBA/In7mdGsyJVHI8lHDW iMLVATO5V/m9aY428VraH2MEIzU4CSagHdkv5k+VWGX3SKcydcvab864bEHaz8/k+AUN7LMOX nVgZtOHk2xokrwok0czFModAPbI5YCau/YSGcqtgB5OEgoYyuNvl1Y07h/+LQ2KysX43gt9bD Tg9NDwR4VsPA4tH6eqnSBpyohuQJ3+yZy3y4ZgrniL15L9apiWO+LLyhB5B/In4fWlPtxSbOD Cxs7hw2qmjqa2V4Fx8f/Ajhi4tPw3CRI6MKZbqBAgmui3aIrrYESifQPOdvWBtgRLNx28eKFM jmy76sBx+K/SfrokgUoOLgY9VEqg1dzIKED+Fhr6eEQ3QGZjZmFCOOFGZfn703GY05PW/D8rZ AJHxKv8r9uEd7fCvZWJ212hHST1ndPVLJK167TPgcZlMpO44HEJeebM+9zyqRBkSeqDUGzSIR lRU5KihXdWVpNeYcCmqA90Xd8s8bVFgBuFd6LoZYOD0XH6iArs9QQX7vi0680kuR0lbUx5YwV nLBvHz42wOapncMmq17hcIN+eBofbw9qRU7TXK1QpFity1h4/4lXv5ea2V0COZQEkGtGVpqN/ czNuLUIZ3b2cXSB5qid4FYC66cRWFHO9GdVFEyQggV+rV942PXOna1rp1kBeXxa6FpyMBn8o1 pb9160/MC+N/x95ciSWEvg8SaxIbuilFK2zLEBeEO0mFxbukdSSbuGJG61Ryqt0IJqpLReRa8 rGt7oKrWkzI4K+HCreq1Z555JiDzyLMgrhXHgoYrJIbA9jtIqNvSnkSIvgygbHyHoNvAMZmBK jDVS7hDfOlbwq2Nk+Y2Xq/pH3ssmWOkIzqNA1GcpVpwkDR1KT3TwVkt1HBhmj0a8XOVZ7DtOJ /XWFOdc2tDKXnsvhQOH+szTpM0STr2mvdZnX86gUYlJheW0c9gMYgYzGA3EYt5hLVLI5hOx36 V0nUecXCpzPDgTH+0f57km4lgVK+8SE6gq1CSDGqTPQ+05KHhQSHxN+MmGVDZnJis/DgDUJ2S E4lnmQk9luB/o9L/SYYHPsjpXikwBzQiV1MoS6aqHJEJqk8qFKzMjC7vaiuZ2wRSOJqbU5QJX VfSNuCSYTZImAyhYbA70mPzV4d7ntcm6d+VS38hyScYBDvp8Pf+Aufj9A==
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/tools-discuss/WsV4bRe1U6e4xojC89yNnZE0TpQ>
Subject: Re: [Tools-discuss] .txt? [I-D Action: draft-xxx.txt]
X-BeenThere: tools-discuss@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: IETF Tools Discussion <tools-discuss.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/tools-discuss>, <mailto:tools-discuss-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/tools-discuss/>
List-Post: <mailto:tools-discuss@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:tools-discuss-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/tools-discuss>, <mailto:tools-discuss-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 30 Jun 2021 13:03:14 -0000

Am 30.06.2021 um 14:59 schrieb Carsten Bormann:
> On 2021-06-30, at 14:54, Julian Reschke <julian.reschke@gmx.de> wrote:
>>
>> Am 30.06.2021 um 07:46 schrieb Julian Reschke:
>>> Am 30.06.2021 um 07:38 schrieb Carsten Bormann:
>>>> On 30. Jun 2021, at 07:37, Julian Reschke <julian.reschke@gmx.de> wrote:
>>>>>
>>>>> content model for lists
>>>>
>>>> Got a reference?
>>>>
>>>> Grüße, Carsten
>>>
>>> It's about making <t> inside <li> mandatory, even for single paragraph
>>> list items; should be mentioned either in
>>> <https://github.com/rfc-format/draft-iab-xml2rfc-v3-bis> or in the "RFC
>>> XML and Style Guide Change Management Team" meeting notes (will try to
>>> find it later).
>>
>> Found it:
>
> Thanks.  I had already forgotten the issue because:
>
>> <https://github.com/rfc-format/draft-iab-xml2rfc-v3-bis/issues/46>,
>
> Closed (WONTFIX, but not explicitly labeled as such)
>
>> <https://trac.ietf.org/trac/xml2rfc/ticket/633>, and
>
> I see nothing wrong with the preptool using only a subset of the syntax.
> (I also don’t know why it would help, though, and why it wouldn’t be done for other instances of mixed content.)

What scared me was "This would make it easier for them to make drafts
consistent when not created by software that already does that". So
consistency was considered more important than less markup.

>> <https://www.ietf.org/archive/id/draft-levkowetz-xml2rfc-v3-implementation-notes-12.html#name-mixed-content-model>.
>
> “Resolution: Rejected.¶”
>
> I thought we were in all-clear state about the risk of this becoming part of v3.

Yep, hopefully.

Best regards, Julian