IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [Tools-discuss] Asynchronous submission

Martin Thomson <mt@lowentropy.net> Sun, 28 May 2023 08:06 UTC

Return-Path: <mt@lowentropy.net>
X-Original-To: tools-discuss@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: tools-discuss@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id B985AC15152B for <tools-discuss@ietfa.amsl.com>; Sun, 28 May 2023 01:06:29 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2.795
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.795 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_EF=-0.1, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW=-0.7, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_H3=0.001, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_WL=0.001, RCVD_IN_ZEN_BLOCKED_OPENDNS=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001, URIBL_DBL_BLOCKED_OPENDNS=0.001, URIBL_ZEN_BLOCKED_OPENDNS=0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=lowentropy.net header.b="ksdseIDH"; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=messagingengine.com header.b="WSjvgTBf"
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([50.223.129.194]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id fqDz3c7deCC3 for <tools-discuss@ietfa.amsl.com>; Sun, 28 May 2023 01:06:25 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from new1-smtp.messagingengine.com (new1-smtp.messagingengine.com [66.111.4.221]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits) key-exchange X25519 server-signature RSA-PSS (2048 bits) server-digest SHA256) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 07125C14F6EC for <tools-discuss@ietf.org>; Sun, 28 May 2023 01:06:24 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from compute6.internal (compute6.nyi.internal [10.202.2.47]) by mailnew.nyi.internal (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0BD8C580173 for <tools-discuss@ietf.org>; Sun, 28 May 2023 04:06:17 -0400 (EDT)
Received: from imap41 ([10.202.2.91]) by compute6.internal (MEProxy); Sun, 28 May 2023 04:06:17 -0400
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=lowentropy.net; h=cc:content-transfer-encoding:content-type:content-type:date :date:from:from:in-reply-to:in-reply-to:message-id:mime-version :references:reply-to:sender:subject:subject:to:to; s=fm2; t= 1685261177; x=1685268377; bh=zsIfra3bFqjAJ7pSmxFC1hTeFiLNqKcZXxk 9l5Cqklo=; b=ksdseIDHBL6lGeZpERSW2bTcHzZBc8MTSzufxcYZND5LgiWs8T5 ctTGooQu/vpDUBGlAGoHVJHCWJsHU168j8ZNwpwmvRXH/S3uJFiE6tJZnqV0LQd3 HyOWZUae47961vJ3hTJTDFg8NaGEfJfLNI59atPcDRnmoo2KbN+sXWnlMQFCbxuU Nod8TSJ1yS6JOA4wWRGEdwluaMpuKOl9KkWUxZtE6hjcjeCdDXpjYzTe7+CQHuA+ 1OngQE9QLXTdX2dfDML5QK75pgiaPwWQBNSxpW8xVBHTpSy+3QfMHsFMpaA0YWoF qzRZeK58xlE3GHn5LNGbPSg5G3J4wQsAx3Q==
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d= messagingengine.com; h=cc:content-transfer-encoding:content-type :content-type:date:date:feedback-id:feedback-id:from:from :in-reply-to:in-reply-to:message-id:mime-version:references :reply-to:sender:subject:subject:to:to:x-me-proxy:x-me-proxy :x-me-sender:x-me-sender:x-sasl-enc; s=fm1; t=1685261177; x= 1685268377; bh=zsIfra3bFqjAJ7pSmxFC1hTeFiLNqKcZXxk9l5Cqklo=; b=W SjvgTBfBV0r76QzIlFeyDqcae4FYANAEADaNpO6cMxQoNLo9/eyKTUfOaMsNMvA+ WjIJCxqCrKZH93IG68Vd12e4cxqBE8KagZl5vIov82c7EUE20u81pBChuTLHIrMD C9sfOfnmVtNMrmwUvsh/HgvkpvnYdDcO0Jc9tKeIHeKawOh3MIvAf/TfE3mElEPx +oCCy7ENR/YZH7m54vytgbk+yPuGh5gzUEhkfIigkgibuSrbDCMr6HGP8RaigTSH Izw1cfL2eofxv2DksVw6JzbzhaQf5YJ02x8OCn2apVZDZFZOtPZQWwJQJFSQGllc Xg9BK438hSXFqaqtdLpNw==
X-ME-Sender: <xms:eAtzZHuEkxqi-3KVIPFVbquLp9ocBud5BR5g5jNouC9o8Iu_V_buvw> <xme:eAtzZIcGMO25r4QXzOCCumgQxQI9IJrY5sHqztPNxUIYKGusVgZNERbngfZnsIMqE lcqb1mkOiG_ZH4q5IY>
X-ME-Proxy-Cause: gggruggvucftvghtrhhoucdtuddrgedvhedrfeekfecutefuodetggdotefrodftvfcurf hrohhfihhlvgemucfhrghsthforghilhdpqfgfvfdpuffrtefokffrpgfnqfghnecuuegr ihhlohhuthemuceftddtnecunecujfgurhepofgfggfkjghffffhvffutgfgsehtqhertd erreejnecuhfhrohhmpedfofgrrhhtihhnucfvhhhomhhsohhnfdcuoehmtheslhhofigv nhhtrhhophihrdhnvghtqeenucggtffrrghtthgvrhhnpefftefgvedvhfdtffehjedufe fhhfevhedufefhgfelleetieefgeefgffgleehgfenucffohhmrghinhepihgvthhfrdho rhhgnecuvehluhhsthgvrhfuihiivgeptdenucfrrghrrghmpehmrghilhhfrhhomhepmh htsehlohifvghnthhrohhphidrnhgvth
X-ME-Proxy: <xmx:eAtzZKxpJDEFw29n-l7S9omYc1nkoMTIWvxiwkbAlhw4yMmrI12-vA> <xmx:eAtzZGPy5HpfJqL0ZQmLZSm0xESMAPKii30HXZhI7NAOEJjy_Ifdjg> <xmx:eAtzZH_qx4558Q4GToeiUB9b1zqmkGj8sDriiHX4ATH8339mm-CYkQ> <xmx:eQtzZKLjYyMbHfjXmhLwk0YwkkZT1qosudU-_FdnbGvDiciPMVOxXg>
Feedback-ID: ic129442d:Fastmail
Received: by mailuser.nyi.internal (Postfix, from userid 501) id 9FBFB234007B; Sun, 28 May 2023 04:06:16 -0400 (EDT)
X-Mailer: MessagingEngine.com Webmail Interface
User-Agent: Cyrus-JMAP/3.9.0-alpha0-441-ga3ab13cd6d-fm-20230517.001-ga3ab13cd
Mime-Version: 1.0
Message-Id: <2f17217e-66b5-4e47-9dd7-077e619f5f37@betaapp.fastmail.com>
In-Reply-To: <E5FE4F29-B372-4191-8BC9-DDF8545DEC0D@tzi.org>
References: <E5FE4F29-B372-4191-8BC9-DDF8545DEC0D@tzi.org>
Date: Sun, 28 May 2023 09:05:55 +0100
From: Martin Thomson <mt@lowentropy.net>
To: tools-discuss@ietf.org
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/tools-discuss/X2vKIpaTmZ9V_uAVLO2PF7_x3ys>
Subject: Re: [Tools-discuss] Asynchronous submission
X-BeenThere: tools-discuss@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.39
Precedence: list
List-Id: IETF Tools Discussion <tools-discuss.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/tools-discuss>, <mailto:tools-discuss-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/tools-discuss/>
List-Post: <mailto:tools-discuss@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:tools-discuss-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/tools-discuss>, <mailto:tools-discuss-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 28 May 2023 08:06:29 -0000

I have been using the automated asynchronous API for some time. But I haven’t implemented waiting. Is there something in the user interface that needs to waited upon?

On Sat, May 27, 2023, at 09:43, Carsten Bormann wrote:
> I just submitted a draft using the new asynchronous submission interface.
>
> The user experience is jarring.  
> The refresh interval is way too long(*) for something that usually took 
> about a second in the previous version.
> Of course, I now know that I can simply CMD-R (F5), but that behavior 
> becoming ingrained may be counterproductive.
>
> So maybe some adaptive refresh interval (with binary exponential 
> backoff?) would be a useful enhancement.
>
> Grüße, Carsten
>
> (*) I have no idea how long, as my patience ran out.
>
> ___________________________________________________________
> Tools-discuss mailing list - Tools-discuss@ietf.org - 
> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/tools-discuss

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email