Re: [Tools-discuss] IEEE in bibxml2 vs. bibxml6

Carsten Bormann <cabo@tzi.org> Wed, 27 February 2019 14:53 UTC

Return-Path: <cabo@tzi.org>
X-Original-To: tools-discuss@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: tools-discuss@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 36CA7130FCF; Wed, 27 Feb 2019 06:53:35 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -4.199
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-4.199 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_MED=-2.3, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id nXz4H6NyfOQm; Wed, 27 Feb 2019 06:53:33 -0800 (PST)
Received: from mailhost.informatik.uni-bremen.de (mailhost.informatik.uni-bremen.de [IPv6:2001:638:708:30c9::12]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 9B96C130EDE; Wed, 27 Feb 2019 06:53:33 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at informatik.uni-bremen.de
Received: from submithost.informatik.uni-bremen.de (submithost2.informatik.uni-bremen.de [134.102.200.7]) by mailhost.informatik.uni-bremen.de (8.14.5/8.14.5) with ESMTP id x1RErOAI016194; Wed, 27 Feb 2019 15:53:29 +0100 (CET)
Received: from [192.168.217.106] (p54A6C2FE.dip0.t-ipconnect.de [84.166.194.254]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by submithost.informatik.uni-bremen.de (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 448dwN0cpNz1Bp8; Wed, 27 Feb 2019 15:53:23 +0100 (CET)
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8"
Mime-Version: 1.0 (Mac OS X Mail 11.5 \(3445.9.1\))
From: Carsten Bormann <cabo@tzi.org>
In-Reply-To: <295f4971-c8b5-aca8-e25f-8a26f949bde2@levkowetz.com>
Date: Wed, 27 Feb 2019 15:53:23 +0100
Cc: tools-discuss <tools-discuss@ietf.org>, Henrik Levkowetz <henrik@levkowetz.com>
X-Mao-Original-Outgoing-Id: 572972001.2844959-b42bc5a4d812a976107026a904cc3579
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Message-Id: <73C747D7-442B-4AD6-9DB5-4B9209E03B4F@tzi.org>
References: <E0C7D267-F536-4F11-A7A6-37B415870AEC@tzi.org> <AE58C9D3-69BC-4887-883E-B88F9D595663@tzi.org> <465df686-2543-2b8d-df81-3de036452a16@levkowetz.com> <FFCC22BF-CB0D-482F-AA03-2508D54F5956@tzi.org> <295f4971-c8b5-aca8-e25f-8a26f949bde2@levkowetz.com>
To: RFC Markdown <rfc-markdown@ietf.org>
X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.3445.9.1)
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/tools-discuss/XDAfMYW-Bi766r0QCYfYjWMYULc>
Subject: Re: [Tools-discuss] IEEE in bibxml2 vs. bibxml6
X-BeenThere: tools-discuss@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: IETF Tools Discussion <tools-discuss.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/tools-discuss>, <mailto:tools-discuss-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/tools-discuss/>
List-Post: <mailto:tools-discuss@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:tools-discuss-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/tools-discuss>, <mailto:tools-discuss-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 27 Feb 2019 14:53:35 -0000

Kramdown-rfc2629 version 1.2.11 now searches bibxml6 for IEEE.* references such as:

  IEEE.754.1985:

There should be no user-visible change for IEEE.* references that already worked.
But new ones should now be working: those that have been added to bibxml6, but not to bibxml2.  See for yourself:

http://xml2rfc.tools.ietf.org/public/rfc/bibxml6/

As always, update via

	gem update kramdown-rfc2629

(add a sudo if needed on your platform), or simply `gem update` to update all rubygems.

Grüße, Carsten

> On Feb 27, 2019, at 14:45, Henrik Levkowetz <henrik@levkowetz.com> wrote:
> 
> 
> On 2019-02-27 14:38, Carsten Bormann wrote:
>> On Feb 27, 2019, at 14:34, Henrik Levkowetz <henrik@levkowetz.com> wrote:
>>> 
>>> For now, I'll happily copy the bibxml2 IEEE entries to bibxml6.
>>> 
>>> Shall I do so?
>> 
>> Please do, assuming there are no conflicts.
>> Then I’ll switch to bibxml6 for IEEE.* references in the next version of kramdown-rfc.
> 
> Ok, done.
> 
> Best,
> 	Henrik
>