Re: [Tools-discuss] IETF Administration LLC staffing update

Adam Roach <adam@nostrum.com> Tue, 08 June 2021 04:04 UTC

Return-Path: <adam@nostrum.com>
X-Original-To: tools-discuss@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: tools-discuss@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id A5D2B3A1F88; Mon, 7 Jun 2021 21:04:38 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2.079
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.079 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_EF=-0.1, NICE_REPLY_A=-0.001, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_BLOCKED=0.001, T_SPF_HELO_PERMERROR=0.01, T_SPF_PERMERROR=0.01, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (1024-bit key) header.d=nostrum.com
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 5BfmhVHFu0cM; Mon, 7 Jun 2021 21:04:33 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from nostrum.com (raven-v6.nostrum.com [IPv6:2001:470:d:1130::1]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 65D9F3A1F84; Mon, 7 Jun 2021 21:04:32 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from Zephyrus.local ([12.3.79.171]) (authenticated bits=0) by nostrum.com (8.16.1/8.16.1) with ESMTPSA id 15844Q9W092308 (version=TLSv1.3 cipher=TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 bits=256 verify=NO); Mon, 7 Jun 2021 23:04:28 -0500 (CDT) (envelope-from adam@nostrum.com)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=simple/simple; d=nostrum.com; s=default; t=1623125069; bh=br/o3GPq+o3vOaXvaEuEJNLgzHmgvaAqPr3OQgGsHhY=; h=Subject:To:References:Cc:From:Date:In-Reply-To; b=DpVZvKEqwr3i1nAMYERE2hBmxf/rC9fo34UgjpIqiLK+J5w6WmCdaFTENzZDpFtEL AwCshja401PJMFuWcd10Hs4QsiqaoSCc7n4yr6FSg7aSzwa5MGdJZk6GWTb/SlFDEQ AbLY2s+W3TDLj1PBoO+AFTzAPVzZc4nuKQ3FVAEk=
X-Authentication-Warning: raven.nostrum.com: Host [12.3.79.171] claimed to be Zephyrus.local
To: Tools Team Discussion <tools-discuss@ietf.org>, Jay Daley <jay@ietf.org>
References: <2DA51059-72D8-4536-A921-7875DC4E432C@ietf.org>
Cc: The IESG <iesg@ietf.org>
From: Adam Roach <adam@nostrum.com>
Message-ID: <942b827f-d473-c31d-46e1-c3be8ee66823@nostrum.com>
Date: Mon, 7 Jun 2021 21:04:26 -0700
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Macintosh; Intel Mac OS X 10.15; rv:68.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/68.11.0
MIME-Version: 1.0
In-Reply-To: <2DA51059-72D8-4536-A921-7875DC4E432C@ietf.org>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8; format=flowed
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Content-Language: en-US
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/tools-discuss/XyycPP-0uy59OFE42FPTxWnPAw0>
Subject: Re: [Tools-discuss] IETF Administration LLC staffing update
X-BeenThere: tools-discuss@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: IETF Tools Discussion <tools-discuss.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/tools-discuss>, <mailto:tools-discuss-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/tools-discuss/>
List-Post: <mailto:tools-discuss@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:tools-discuss-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/tools-discuss>, <mailto:tools-discuss-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 08 Jun 2021 04:04:39 -0000

[cc'ing the IESG for their awareness, since authority over the @ietf.org 
domain has historically been in their remit]


On 6/7/21 19:40, IETF Executive Director wrote:
> Lee-Berkeley is an experienced fundraiser, most recently with the Center for Democracy and Technology (CDT).  She is based in the United States and can be reached at lbshaw@ietf.org.


I'm surprised to see new personal addresses being provisioned under 
"@ietf.org".org". My recollection is that we had a discussion between the 
IESG and the LLC some while back (when I was still a member of the IESG) 
where we concluded that this is a confusing practice that might lead to 
conflicts in the future. The last I recall seeing on the topic was over 
a year ago, at which point it sounded like there was an active plan to 
move ahead with "@llc.ietf.org" email addresses:

https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/tools-development/kxQjVyVdJtXeX6RWX2BTN-GMvTA/

Where do we stand on that plan, and what is the current thinking about 
how we might unwind in-use personal addresses under "@ietf.org"?

/a