Re: [Tools-discuss] Rfcdiff v 0.12 feedback
Brian E Carpenter <brian.e.carpenter@gmail.com> Tue, 01 June 2021 21:33 UTC
Return-Path: <brian.e.carpenter@gmail.com>
X-Original-To: tools-discuss@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: tools-discuss@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7E5213A2825 for <tools-discuss@ietfa.amsl.com>; Tue, 1 Jun 2021 14:33:43 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2.099
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.099 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_EF=-0.1, FREEMAIL_FROM=0.001, NICE_REPLY_A=-0.001, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE=-0.0001, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=gmail.com
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id ZtSFWVyImoSA for <tools-discuss@ietfa.amsl.com>; Tue, 1 Jun 2021 14:33:39 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mail-pf1-x42f.google.com (mail-pf1-x42f.google.com [IPv6:2607:f8b0:4864:20::42f]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 39D1E3A281F for <tools-discuss@ietf.org>; Tue, 1 Jun 2021 14:33:39 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by mail-pf1-x42f.google.com with SMTP id g18so552339pfr.2 for <tools-discuss@ietf.org>; Tue, 01 Jun 2021 14:33:39 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20161025; h=subject:to:references:from:message-id:date:user-agent:mime-version :in-reply-to:content-language:content-transfer-encoding; bh=zK5+L+0XnLRelFhyA+FvOwvyIHMxj5Vz7OEjLEDYhBQ=; b=e8armqAFViMz+KM3BO5YsQJAW6jABVe+IyrBTuWBIMOjxW2i/Z7e79Z4NWIgr+mBrs 5nKA+RRjsbss6ay05HpkSPCnPPbcAHTGV0qIXoeQ5L6edVB7e28lFHOAH2YrKdHM9dHX dxDHo5o2KXZSp+P7L0CYXEkCBbltOBdKglivY8cDm8bwhLzSDlWmmRJ/6rZraChCcl0y ggQgB5yc9ZXLhfpqCHT37KbPe1jbcXVB7/GmRmxXw7JUFyQ8exDKcrJ4ev60qXRvIAsB ykMHjBlMV2O447UnlQ1a/IqWTXKsRje4Dr4p9Ne1rgpwQ2A2lX6JO+8aDVBGvVgX3r6J 5wBQ==
X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:subject:to:references:from:message-id:date :user-agent:mime-version:in-reply-to:content-language :content-transfer-encoding; bh=zK5+L+0XnLRelFhyA+FvOwvyIHMxj5Vz7OEjLEDYhBQ=; b=gZM5olLPMZayxtWlFyCjEW1vuBEtKaPf4r1/lmfYTbBQj33yhMrPxUorpqW/QADUzI JBHKxTq1PRw3a7oY/bbLuvWoSVCKvIVRp7c9rukwXzWV7sZopRhpsWZuq9YU5ePuIDEZ T3cTumzZRwBSV/+Ml8nX+Rxvg/+uubCzkgtpvq2aZwuZqssOhvaI0X6/S+S9j9JeNiuW lh0bCJ3l0+Ui7ugdiJ9REeVfIJhFBQm8ObLdK+1w/SRXsckrdFM0xIOww97hMwwflg30 P4N9TpB61cMrHXWqteTE8WRA7CUPUGU9JBAbUflXg7V/Gwm7g1iI3NraFp41pUalStj6 3teA==
X-Gm-Message-State: AOAM533R6H0jWtjT0RhwqJ8rALgiQf504tyqxEy6RaA598mb8Y2Ecr1A VE4Jq61h9ZWUgLpxF/tq4y/9UpHIJdhU/w==
X-Google-Smtp-Source: ABdhPJwNRpeTHDdb97Vm8aippfAsDTweqndSngoV0ynNFCiIdi+A5ccj/bEhjUjvQMBvLImj3SS+hQ==
X-Received: by 2002:a65:4d44:: with SMTP id j4mr29956524pgt.275.1622583217770; Tue, 01 Jun 2021 14:33:37 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from ?IPv6:2406:e003:100d:901:80b2:5c79:2266:e431? ([2406:e003:100d:901:80b2:5c79:2266:e431]) by smtp.gmail.com with ESMTPSA id k21sm15191738pgb.56.2021.06.01.14.33.35 (version=TLS1_3 cipher=TLS_AES_128_GCM_SHA256 bits=128/128); Tue, 01 Jun 2021 14:33:37 -0700 (PDT)
To: Robert Sparks <rjsparks@nostrum.com>, tools-discuss@ietf.org
References: <CAF4+nEGM5Q5sq5Tn5xtPi9FvSyy2cMYC+bZxp2y9bkT39ttheA@mail.gmail.com> <10C19260-EBAF-41EC-B4FE-BBF23919D84D@tzi.org> <c8fd1ace-e9e5-c67c-4952-ea1974577243@nostrum.com>
From: Brian E Carpenter <brian.e.carpenter@gmail.com>
Message-ID: <3f0522f4-3ff3-6182-9b56-3cb694c02f80@gmail.com>
Date: Wed, 02 Jun 2021 09:33:32 +1200
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 10.0; Win64; x64; rv:78.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/78.10.0
MIME-Version: 1.0
In-Reply-To: <c8fd1ace-e9e5-c67c-4952-ea1974577243@nostrum.com>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8"
Content-Language: en-US
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/tools-discuss/YXvsfALcM74NiWNvsny0uGQewno>
Subject: Re: [Tools-discuss] Rfcdiff v 0.12 feedback
X-BeenThere: tools-discuss@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: IETF Tools Discussion <tools-discuss.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/tools-discuss>, <mailto:tools-discuss-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/tools-discuss/>
List-Post: <mailto:tools-discuss@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:tools-discuss-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/tools-discuss>, <mailto:tools-discuss-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 01 Jun 2021 21:33:44 -0000
Robert, The behaviour of https://tools.ietf.org/rfcdiff definitely seems to have changed recently. For whatever reason, to save the actual html file of the side-by-side diffs, you now need to select the "Web page, complete" option in Firefox, which was unnecessary before. No problem once you know. As Donald says, saving this format can be very useful when working with co-authors. I couldn't actually tell whether www.ietf.org/rfcdiff has changed. My browser seems to have decided that I want the "Web page, complete" option by default now ;-). Regards Brian On 02-Jun-21 07:22, Robert Sparks wrote: > What do you see at https://www.ietf.org/rfcdiff? > > (That's the webservice that will have support going forward - the page > at tools.ietf.org will likely start redirecting soon). > > RjS > > On 6/1/21 1:19 PM, Carsten Bormann wrote: >> Weird, this form used to do a GET, which led to a reusable URL in the browser address line (see the bottom half of the page for how that is used). >> >> (You can still have that after using this useful little bookmark on this form, which I have stored as “frmget”: >> >> javascript:(function()%7Bvar%20x,i;%20x%20=%20document.forms;%20for%20(i%20=%200;%20i%20%3C%20x.length;%20++i)%20x%5Bi%5D.method=%22get%22;%20alert(%22Changed%20%22%20+%20x.length%20+%20%22%20forms%20to%20use%20the%20GET%20method.%20%20After%20submitting%20a%20form%20from%20this%20page,%20you%20should%20be%20able%20to%20bookmark%20the%20result.%22);%20%7D)(); >> >> .) >> >> The form page now uses POST, which doesn’t make sense to me. >> >> I can still save the resulting page and look at it in its full glory (both in Chrome and Safari, but of course the formats are different), so I cannot reproduce that part of the report. >> >> But I want my GET back! >> (Without needing to use the frmget hack, please.) >> >> By the way, the rfcdiff is 1.48, only the form page seems to have a separate version number. >> (Brew’s rfcdiff is still 1.46, which I have pinned now...) >> >> Grüße, Carsten >> >> >>> On 2021-06-01, at 19:46, Donald Eastlake <d3e3e3@gmail.com> wrote: >>> >>> Some change seems to have been made to stop people from saving Diffs >>> from the Rfcdiff Web Service, https://tools.ietf.org/rfcdiff. >>> >> ___________________________________________________________ >> Tools-discuss mailing list - Tools-discuss@ietf.org >> This list is for discussion, not for action requests or bug reports. >> * Report datatracker and mailarchive bugs to: datatracker-project@ietf.org >> * Report tools.ietf.org bugs to: webmaster@tools.ietf.org >> * Report all other bugs or issues to: ietf-action@ietf.org >> List info (including how to Unsubscribe): https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/tools-discuss > > ___________________________________________________________ > Tools-discuss mailing list - Tools-discuss@ietf.org > This list is for discussion, not for action requests or bug reports. > * Report datatracker and mailarchive bugs to: datatracker-project@ietf.org > * Report tools.ietf.org bugs to: webmaster@tools.ietf.org > * Report all other bugs or issues to: ietf-action@ietf.org > List info (including how to Unsubscribe): https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/tools-discuss >
- [Tools-discuss] Rfcdiff v 0.12 feedback Donald Eastlake
- Re: [Tools-discuss] Rfcdiff v 0.12 feedback Carsten Bormann
- Re: [Tools-discuss] Rfcdiff v 0.12 feedback Robert Sparks
- Re: [Tools-discuss] Rfcdiff v 0.12 feedback Jay Daley
- Re: [Tools-discuss] Rfcdiff v 0.12 feedback Donald Eastlake
- Re: [Tools-discuss] Rfcdiff v 0.12 feedback Brian E Carpenter
- Re: [Tools-discuss] Rfcdiff v 0.12 feedback Carsten Bormann
- Re: [Tools-discuss] Rfcdiff v 0.12 feedback Carsten Bormann
- Re: [Tools-discuss] Rfcdiff v 0.12 feedback Carsten Bormann
- Re: [Tools-discuss] Rfcdiff v 0.12 feedback Jay Daley
- Re: [Tools-discuss] Rfcdiff v 0.12 feedback Carsten Bormann
- Re: [Tools-discuss] Rfcdiff v 0.12 feedback Jay Daley