[Tools-discuss] Reaching RFC authors
Michael Tuexen <michael.tuexen@lurchi.franken.de> Sun, 18 August 2024 12:01 UTC
Return-Path: <michael.tuexen@lurchi.franken.de>
X-Original-To: tools-discuss@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: tools-discuss@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 300F0C14F6BE for <tools-discuss@ietfa.amsl.com>; Sun, 18 Aug 2024 05:01:20 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2.608
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.608 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW=-0.7, RCVD_IN_ZEN_BLOCKED_OPENDNS=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001, T_SCC_BODY_TEXT_LINE=-0.01, URIBL_DBL_BLOCKED_OPENDNS=0.001, URIBL_ZEN_BLOCKED_OPENDNS=0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([50.223.129.194]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id m_jXilXm5yse for <tools-discuss@ietfa.amsl.com>; Sun, 18 Aug 2024 05:01:16 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from drew.franken.de (mail-n.franken.de [193.175.24.27]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher AECDH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 36412C14F69D for <tools-discuss@ietf.org>; Sun, 18 Aug 2024 05:01:14 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from smtpclient.apple (unknown [IPv6:2a02:8109:1140:c3d:c1d6:55af:2ce0:e5b8]) (Authenticated sender: lurchi) by mail-n.franken.de (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 57B3C721E2806 for <tools-discuss@ietf.org>; Sun, 18 Aug 2024 14:01:08 +0200 (CEST)
From: Michael Tuexen <michael.tuexen@lurchi.franken.de>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Mime-Version: 1.0 (Mac OS X Mail 16.0 \(3776.700.51\))
Message-Id: <872CECC7-FB7D-4540-B432-8B01A179C654@lurchi.franken.de>
Date: Sun, 18 Aug 2024 14:01:07 +0200
To: tools-discuss@ietf.org
X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.3776.700.51)
Message-ID-Hash: Z5J67LSUQWHFSLJGCSW3CCWGW4V3ZYIR
X-Message-ID-Hash: Z5J67LSUQWHFSLJGCSW3CCWGW4V3ZYIR
X-MailFrom: michael.tuexen@lurchi.franken.de
X-Mailman-Rule-Misses: dmarc-mitigation; no-senders; approved; emergency; loop; banned-address; member-moderation; header-match-tools-discuss.ietf.org-0; nonmember-moderation; administrivia; implicit-dest; max-recipients; max-size; news-moderation; no-subject; digests; suspicious-header
X-Mailman-Version: 3.3.9rc4
Precedence: list
Subject: [Tools-discuss] Reaching RFC authors
List-Id: IETF Tools Discussion <tools-discuss.ietf.org>
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/tools-discuss/Ybht3ESKrX_yj5VOSe1eKpbbkEM>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/tools-discuss>
List-Help: <mailto:tools-discuss-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Owner: <mailto:tools-discuss-owner@ietf.org>
List-Post: <mailto:tools-discuss@ietf.org>
List-Subscribe: <mailto:tools-discuss-join@ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <mailto:tools-discuss-leave@ietf.org>
Dear all, is it intended that the authors of RFC n can be reached via the email address rfcn@ietf.org <mailto:rfcn@ietf.org>, where n is the number of the RFC? If that is true, this does not work for n = 4960 and n = 9260. In that case I get: <rfc4960@ietf.org>: host mail.ietf.org[50.223.129.194] said: 550 5.1.1 <rfc4960@ietf.org>: Recipient address rejected: User unknown in virtual alias table (in reply to RCPT TO command) and <rfc9260@ietf.org>: host mail.ietf.org[50.223.129.194] said: 550 5.1.1 <rfc9260@ietf.org>: Recipient address rejected: User unknown in virtual alias table (in reply to RCPT TO command) Best regards Michael
- [Tools-discuss] Reaching RFC authors Michael Tuexen
- [Tools-discuss] Re: Reaching RFC authors John Levine
- [Tools-discuss] Re: Reaching RFC authors Michael Tuexen
- [Tools-discuss] Re: Reaching RFC authors S Moonesamy
- [Tools-discuss] Re: Reaching RFC authors Brian E Carpenter