[Tools-discuss] HTMLized document deals poorly with very long "Updates:" list?
Benjamin Kaduk <kaduk@mit.edu> Mon, 11 November 2019 19:25 UTC
Return-Path: <kaduk@mit.edu>
X-Original-To: tools-discuss@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: tools-discuss@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 18738120164 for <tools-discuss@ietfa.amsl.com>; Mon, 11 Nov 2019 11:25:35 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -4.2
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-4.2 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_MED=-2.3, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id IRgBSKS5iA-I for <tools-discuss@ietfa.amsl.com>; Mon, 11 Nov 2019 11:25:33 -0800 (PST)
Received: from outgoing.mit.edu (outgoing-auth-1.mit.edu [18.9.28.11]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id E36B6120154 for <tools-discuss@ietf.org>; Mon, 11 Nov 2019 11:25:31 -0800 (PST)
Received: from kduck.mit.edu ([24.16.140.251]) (authenticated bits=56) (User authenticated as kaduk@ATHENA.MIT.EDU) by outgoing.mit.edu (8.14.7/8.12.4) with ESMTP id xABJPSRA008791 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 bits=256 verify=NOT) for <tools-discuss@ietf.org>; Mon, 11 Nov 2019 14:25:30 -0500
Date: Mon, 11 Nov 2019 11:25:27 -0800
From: Benjamin Kaduk <kaduk@mit.edu>
To: tools-discuss@ietf.org
Message-ID: <20191111192527.GD32847@kduck.mit.edu>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
Content-Disposition: inline
User-Agent: Mutt/1.12.1 (2019-06-15)
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/tools-discuss/Ye1kFW7ltNY7n_ROgW7LIKpzwnI>
Subject: [Tools-discuss] HTMLized document deals poorly with very long "Updates:" list?
X-BeenThere: tools-discuss@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: IETF Tools Discussion <tools-discuss.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/tools-discuss>, <mailto:tools-discuss-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/tools-discuss/>
List-Post: <mailto:tools-discuss@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:tools-discuss-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/tools-discuss>, <mailto:tools-discuss-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 11 Nov 2019 19:25:35 -0000
Hi all, Comparing https://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-ietf-tls-oldversions-deprecate-05 and https://tools.ietf.org/id/draft-ietf-tls-oldversions-deprecate-05.txt , I see that the former seems to be missing most of the line of "Updates:": "7507 7465 7030 6750 6749 6739". It only has the last of those, and Stephen's affiliation is correspondingly shifted to the left a bunch. Any ideas why this might be happening? Thanks, Ben
- [Tools-discuss] HTMLized document deals poorly wi… Benjamin Kaduk
- Re: [Tools-discuss] HTMLized document deals poorl… Henrik Levkowetz