Re: [Tools-discuss] disappearing IDs on www.ietf.org

Nico Williams <nico@cryptonector.com> Sun, 13 September 2020 20:41 UTC

Return-Path: <nico@cryptonector.com>
X-Original-To: tools-discuss@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: tools-discuss@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id EE6E43A0658 for <tools-discuss@ietfa.amsl.com>; Sun, 13 Sep 2020 13:41:16 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2.099
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.099 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_EF=-0.1, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (1024-bit key) header.d=cryptonector.com
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id KbhrP4uAbllE for <tools-discuss@ietfa.amsl.com>; Sun, 13 Sep 2020 13:41:15 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from dog.birch.relay.mailchannels.net (dog.birch.relay.mailchannels.net [23.83.209.48]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 8CA733A0C16 for <tools-discuss@ietf.org>; Sun, 13 Sep 2020 13:41:15 -0700 (PDT)
X-Sender-Id: dreamhost|x-authsender|nico@cryptonector.com
Received: from relay.mailchannels.net (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by relay.mailchannels.net (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8195D7E0F02; Sun, 13 Sep 2020 20:41:14 +0000 (UTC)
Received: from pdx1-sub0-mail-a46.g.dreamhost.com (100-98-118-22.trex.outbound.svc.cluster.local [100.98.118.22]) (Authenticated sender: dreamhost) by relay.mailchannels.net (Postfix) with ESMTPA id B508A7E0564; Sun, 13 Sep 2020 20:41:13 +0000 (UTC)
X-Sender-Id: dreamhost|x-authsender|nico@cryptonector.com
Received: from pdx1-sub0-mail-a46.g.dreamhost.com (pop.dreamhost.com [64.90.62.162]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384) by 0.0.0.0:2500 (trex/5.18.9); Sun, 13 Sep 2020 20:41:14 +0000
X-MC-Relay: Neutral
X-MailChannels-SenderId: dreamhost|x-authsender|nico@cryptonector.com
X-MailChannels-Auth-Id: dreamhost
X-Bitter-Well-Made: 0e0e34ce533eee70_1600029673977_98371499
X-MC-Loop-Signature: 1600029673977:3398139326
X-MC-Ingress-Time: 1600029673977
Received: from pdx1-sub0-mail-a46.g.dreamhost.com (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by pdx1-sub0-mail-a46.g.dreamhost.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 705E07F4AC; Sun, 13 Sep 2020 13:41:13 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha1; c=relaxed; d=cryptonector.com; h=date :from:to:cc:subject:message-id:references:mime-version :content-type:in-reply-to:content-transfer-encoding; s= cryptonector.com; bh=LhjB2E/dOYH+RS4B69WYmpOQ6ag=; b=a+oa9NHNd0C hOkyskUVUBUQj0QLq2Le32MlAUMbKWgmcFG1fx/ZA4hYjsyV7PEfHkxJOCLs8O0u 8poneQ3uydbNr3CCRtMC4rdAXbfeoRjrDZ5JXseglI68esSIv0HCzj6AnEQ3X9ok 7WpiXVZEoBU42WeQox5K+xveqypd1p2c=
Received: from localhost (unknown [24.28.108.183]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) (Authenticated sender: nico@cryptonector.com) by pdx1-sub0-mail-a46.g.dreamhost.com (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 0944E7F480; Sun, 13 Sep 2020 13:41:11 -0700 (PDT)
Date: Sun, 13 Sep 2020 15:41:08 -0500
X-DH-BACKEND: pdx1-sub0-mail-a46
From: Nico Williams <nico@cryptonector.com>
To: Carsten Bormann <cabo@tzi.org>
Cc: Tools Team Discussion <tools-discuss@ietf.org>
Message-ID: <20200913204107.GY3100@localhost>
References: <8657.1599751932@localhost> <84c8d593-c7b6-4327-338f-9b2b0e7a36e0@levkowetz.com> <0C6D4DE2-F9F3-4C7C-8427-264F34C8C2B7@tzi.org> <26d795d2-3761-2950-4346-62f849d86eed@nostrum.com> <7792.1599768579@localhost> <C73D6AB9-694E-458E-AEEE-45DBDEF623C5@vigilsec.com> <20200913194859.GX3100@localhost> <6B3F25CF-F1BF-4332-89DC-151D31227626@tzi.org>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8
Content-Disposition: inline
In-Reply-To: <6B3F25CF-F1BF-4332-89DC-151D31227626@tzi.org>
User-Agent: Mutt/1.9.4 (2018-02-28)
X-VR-OUT-STATUS: OK
X-VR-OUT-SCORE: -100
X-VR-OUT-SPAMCAUSE: gggruggvucftvghtrhhoucdtuddrgeduiedrudeigedgheelucetufdoteggodetrfdotffvucfrrhhofhhilhgvmecuggftfghnshhusghstghrihgsvgdpffftgfetoffjqffuvfenuceurghilhhouhhtmecufedttdenucesvcftvggtihhpihgvnhhtshculddquddttddmnecujfgurhepfffhvffukfhfgggtugfgjggfsehtkeertddtreejnecuhfhrohhmpefpihgtohcuhghilhhlihgrmhhsuceonhhitghosegtrhihphhtohhnvggtthhorhdrtghomheqnecuggftrfgrthhtvghrnhepjedvtefhhedtieettdejtdfgheegfffgheejiedvgfduledvleehleetkeeuhffgnecuffhomhgrihhnpehivghtfhdrohhrghenucfkphepvdegrddvkedruddtkedrudekfeenucevlhhushhtvghrufhiiigvpedtnecurfgrrhgrmhepmhhouggvpehsmhhtphdphhgvlhhopehlohgtrghlhhhoshhtpdhinhgvthepvdegrddvkedruddtkedrudekfedprhgvthhurhhnqdhprghthheppfhitghoucghihhllhhirghmshcuoehnihgtohestghrhihpthhonhgvtghtohhrrdgtohhmqedpmhgrihhlfhhrohhmpehnihgtohestghrhihpthhonhgvtghtohhrrdgtohhmpdhnrhgtphhtthhopehnihgtohestghrhihpthhonhgvtghtohhrrdgtohhm
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/tools-discuss/Z9tSPUesKrS5aOweXvWfGxbKSV8>
Subject: Re: [Tools-discuss] disappearing IDs on www.ietf.org
X-BeenThere: tools-discuss@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: IETF Tools Discussion <tools-discuss.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/tools-discuss>, <mailto:tools-discuss-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/tools-discuss/>
List-Post: <mailto:tools-discuss@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:tools-discuss-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/tools-discuss>, <mailto:tools-discuss-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 13 Sep 2020 20:41:17 -0000

On Sun, Sep 13, 2020 at 10:13:08PM +0200, Carsten Bormann wrote:
> On 2020-09-13, at 21:49, Nico Williams <nico@cryptonector.com> wrote:
> > 
> > It used to be that way, then we stopped removing them, and now we're
> > doing it again?
> > 
> 
> More like: 
> > It used to be that way, then we stopped removing them, and now we’re
> > designing our software as if we still were.

I don't understand just what you mean here.