[Tools-discuss] Lack of history for a draft?
Paul Hoffman <paul.hoffman@vpnc.org> Wed, 02 September 2020 21:12 UTC
Return-Path: <paul.hoffman@vpnc.org>
X-Original-To: tools-discuss@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: tools-discuss@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 530FB3A0FA8 for <tools-discuss@ietfa.amsl.com>; Wed, 2 Sep 2020 14:12:25 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.497
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.497 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, KHOP_HELO_FCRDNS=0.399, MAY_BE_FORGED=0.001, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_NONE=0.001, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001] autolearn=no autolearn_force=no
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id jcQ-TXwR16FC for <tools-discuss@ietfa.amsl.com>; Wed, 2 Sep 2020 14:12:23 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mail.proper.com (Opus1.Proper.COM [207.182.41.91]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id B4B5D3A0FA7 for <tools-discuss@ietf.org>; Wed, 2 Sep 2020 14:12:23 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from [10.32.60.132] (76-209-242-70.lightspeed.mtryca.sbcglobal.net [76.209.242.70] (may be forged)) (authenticated bits=0) by mail.proper.com (8.15.2/8.15.2) with ESMTPSA id 082LAfFA070104 (version=TLSv1.2 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 bits=256 verify=NO) for <tools-discuss@ietf.org>; Wed, 2 Sep 2020 14:10:42 -0700 (MST) (envelope-from paul.hoffman@vpnc.org)
X-Authentication-Warning: mail.proper.com: Host 76-209-242-70.lightspeed.mtryca.sbcglobal.net [76.209.242.70] (may be forged) claimed to be [10.32.60.132]
From: Paul Hoffman <paul.hoffman@vpnc.org>
To: Tools Discussion <tools-discuss@ietf.org>
Date: Wed, 02 Sep 2020 14:12:20 -0700
X-Mailer: MailMate (1.13.2r5672)
Message-ID: <8DD7B25D-3233-49AA-9987-EA9A23F2498B@vpnc.org>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; format="flowed"
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/tools-discuss/ZFOFem6-Jz8GkeeQIaEYoPGyIDs>
Subject: [Tools-discuss] Lack of history for a draft?
X-BeenThere: tools-discuss@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: IETF Tools Discussion <tools-discuss.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/tools-discuss>, <mailto:tools-discuss-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/tools-discuss/>
List-Post: <mailto:tools-discuss@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:tools-discuss-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/tools-discuss>, <mailto:tools-discuss-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 02 Sep 2020 21:12:25 -0000
For example:
https://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-hardie-dispatch-rfc3405-update
This doesn't show the history of the earlier drafts, which I am used to
seeing. Did that disappear on purpose, or is this a bug?
--Paul Hoffman
- Re: [Tools-discuss] Lack of history for a draft? John Levine
- [Tools-discuss] Lack of history for a draft? Paul Hoffman
- Re: [Tools-discuss] Lack of history for a draft? Brian E Carpenter