Re: [Tools-discuss] Feature request / bug -- new author added to draft -> no submission email.

Henrik Levkowetz <henrik@levkowetz.com> Fri, 28 June 2013 18:18 UTC

Return-Path: <henrik@levkowetz.com>
X-Original-To: tools-discuss@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: tools-discuss@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1A41221F92B7 for <tools-discuss@ietfa.amsl.com>; Fri, 28 Jun 2013 11:18:36 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -102.599
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-102.599 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-2.599, USER_IN_WHITELIST=-100]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([12.22.58.30]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 7XBR7stv9HmV for <tools-discuss@ietfa.amsl.com>; Fri, 28 Jun 2013 11:18:35 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from grenache.tools.ietf.org (grenache.tools.ietf.org [IPv6:2a01:3f0:1:2::30]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2C3B321F92A5 for <tools-discuss@ietf.org>; Fri, 28 Jun 2013 11:18:29 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:52652 helo=vigonier.lan ident=henrik) by grenache.tools.ietf.org with esmtpsa (TLS1.0:DHE_RSA_CAMELLIA_256_CBC_SHA1:256) (Exim 4.80) (envelope-from <henrik@levkowetz.com>) id 1UsdFY-0003SE-83; Fri, 28 Jun 2013 20:18:24 +0200
Message-ID: <51CDD370.6060105@levkowetz.com>
Date: Fri, 28 Jun 2013 20:18:24 +0200
From: Henrik Levkowetz <henrik@levkowetz.com>
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Macintosh; Intel Mac OS X 10.8; rv:17.0) Gecko/20130620 Thunderbird/17.0.7
MIME-Version: 1.0
To: Warren Kumari <warren@kumari.net>
References: <0EF11A8A-C217-49CE-8BFF-BF34EA47AC24@kumari.net>
In-Reply-To: <0EF11A8A-C217-49CE-8BFF-BF34EA47AC24@kumari.net>
X-Enigmail-Version: 1.5.1
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="windows-1252"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
X-SA-Exim-Connect-IP: 127.0.0.1
X-SA-Exim-Rcpt-To: warren@kumari.net, tools-discuss@ietf.org
X-SA-Exim-Mail-From: henrik@levkowetz.com
X-SA-Exim-Scanned: No (on grenache.tools.ietf.org); SAEximRunCond expanded to false
Cc: "tools-discuss@ietf.org" <tools-discuss@ietf.org>
Subject: Re: [Tools-discuss] Feature request / bug -- new author added to draft -> no submission email.
X-BeenThere: tools-discuss@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.12
Precedence: list
List-Id: IETF Tools Discussion <tools-discuss.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/tools-discuss>, <mailto:tools-discuss-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/tools-discuss>
List-Post: <mailto:tools-discuss@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:tools-discuss-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/tools-discuss>, <mailto:tools-discuss-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 28 Jun 2013 18:18:36 -0000

Hi Warren,

On 2013-06-28 19:46 Warren Kumari said the following:
> Hi all,
> 
> 
> I was recently added as a co-author on an (existing) draft. I made
> some changes (including adding myself to the authors section), bumped
> the version number, and went to the submission tool
> (https://datatracker.ietf.org/submit/).
> 
> I uploaded the draft and chose myself as the 'Submitter'. This took
> me to the standard page saying: "Your submission is pending email
> authentication. An email has been sent you with instructions." The
> email never arrived…..
> 
> Turns out that this is by design -- I had added myself as an author,
> and there is a rule that an existing author has to approve it (to
> stop shenanigans, etc).
> 
> My feature request: Could the "Your submission is pending email
> authentication" be modified to say something like: "You have
> attempted to add yourself to an already published draft. An existing
> author needs to do this. This submission has been cancelled, please
> ask an existing author to add you"?

Certainly.  I'd even call it a bug that there's no informative message like the
one you propose, in this case.

> If this is hard (e.g: because the web bit doesn't have the info),
> could there perhaps be an email sent to the submitter saying
> something similar?

The web bit should have the info.  Will fix.


Best regards,

	Henrik