Re: [Tools-discuss] Strange IDnits behavior (or is it something else?)

Henrik Levkowetz <henrik@levkowetz.com> Wed, 30 September 2020 13:16 UTC

Return-Path: <henrik@levkowetz.com>
X-Original-To: tools-discuss@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: tools-discuss@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 037CC3A0922 for <tools-discuss@ietfa.amsl.com>; Wed, 30 Sep 2020 06:16:09 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2.112
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.112 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, NICE_REPLY_A=-0.213, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id ffeVXxlQhcmo for <tools-discuss@ietfa.amsl.com>; Wed, 30 Sep 2020 06:16:05 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from zinfandel.tools.ietf.org (zinfandel.tools.ietf.org [64.170.98.42]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES128-SHA (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 6F1493A08EB for <tools-discuss@ietf.org>; Wed, 30 Sep 2020 06:16:05 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from h-202-242.a357.priv.bahnhof.se ([158.174.202.242]:61253 helo=tannat.localdomain) by zinfandel.tools.ietf.org with esmtpsa (TLS1.2:DHE_RSA_AES_128_CBC_SHA1:128) (Exim 4.80) (envelope-from <henrik@levkowetz.com>) id 1kNbxk-0005l3-P3; Wed, 30 Sep 2020 06:16:05 -0700
To: Lars Eggert <lars@eggert.org>
References: <CAKKJt-eeYvfOuFwqTtXeHrYjnw3hQR_u8hb4sc9c1zSi5oXK0Q@mail.gmail.com> <3f032b28-3159-355e-db2c-8be749fad47e@gmx.de> <0B6004B7-8BBD-4A22-A155-7E8D47F6727D@eggert.org> <6742c6a8-5402-f62d-67ee-fed8b2f81619@levkowetz.com> <2DC190C0-F601-4CC0-99F1-644A4765B061@eggert.org> <235fce42-4ba4-718b-a957-5cc0875375b7@levkowetz.com> <D91053BB-B1C5-4B69-805E-526849B05D96@eggert.org>
Cc: tools-discuss@ietf.org
From: Henrik Levkowetz <henrik@levkowetz.com>
Message-ID: <18d47576-8fc9-0645-7a5d-ec288baaf2ab@levkowetz.com>
Date: Wed, 30 Sep 2020 15:15:57 +0200
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Macintosh; Intel Mac OS X 10.11; rv:45.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/45.8.0
MIME-Version: 1.0
In-Reply-To: <D91053BB-B1C5-4B69-805E-526849B05D96@eggert.org>
Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha256; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="HlLVdGv0kTCwXv6eCK2JaD8II4F3C79Ka"
X-SA-Exim-Connect-IP: 158.174.202.242
X-SA-Exim-Rcpt-To: tools-discuss@ietf.org, lars@eggert.org
X-SA-Exim-Mail-From: henrik@levkowetz.com
X-SA-Exim-Version: 4.2.1 (built Mon, 26 Dec 2011 16:24:06 +0000)
X-SA-Exim-Scanned: Yes (on zinfandel.tools.ietf.org)
X-Clacks-Overhead: GNU Terry Pratchett
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/tools-discuss/aaaGYPPz_CrKR_ZbWUHS-KQbXGg>
Subject: Re: [Tools-discuss] Strange IDnits behavior (or is it something else?)
X-BeenThere: tools-discuss@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: IETF Tools Discussion <tools-discuss.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/tools-discuss>, <mailto:tools-discuss-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/tools-discuss/>
List-Post: <mailto:tools-discuss@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:tools-discuss-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/tools-discuss>, <mailto:tools-discuss-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 30 Sep 2020 13:16:09 -0000

Hi Lars,

On 2020-09-30 09:33, Lars Eggert wrote:
> Hi,
> 
> On 2020-9-23, at 0:26, Henrik Levkowetz <henrik@levkowetz.com> wrote:
>> Being worked at; complete rewrite.  Not ready for primetime; will be within
>> months.
> 
> is this development happening in the open, e.g., is there a GitHub repo?

There's a repo, but it's currently private.  Will be open when the code
settles.

> The current idnits is basically broken (mostly because the state
> files seem to have gone AWOL), and I'd be happy to try a development
> version of whatever is next rather than live with the current defunct
> one.

Glad to have you test the new version when I get to that point.

The bad state file is a bug and will need to be fixed, irrespective of
testing of the new version.  I'm looking into that right now (looks to
be a matter of missing UTF-8 support in a processing script).


	Henrik