IETF Logo Mail Archive

[Tools-discuss] IEEE in bibxml2 vs. bibxml6

Carsten Bormann <cabo@tzi.org> Wed, 15 March 2017 07:36 UTC

Return-Path: <cabo@tzi.org>
X-Original-To: tools-discuss@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: tools-discuss@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6E9001296A2 for <tools-discuss@ietfa.amsl.com>; Wed, 15 Mar 2017 00:36:14 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -4.2
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-4.2 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_MED=-2.3] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id b3yjm2Y_RHbA for <tools-discuss@ietfa.amsl.com>; Wed, 15 Mar 2017 00:36:12 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mailhost.informatik.uni-bremen.de (mailhost.informatik.uni-bremen.de [IPv6:2001:638:708:30c9::12]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id D5B1F1296A7 for <tools-discuss@ietf.org>; Wed, 15 Mar 2017 00:36:09 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at informatik.uni-bremen.de
Received: from submithost.informatik.uni-bremen.de (submithost.informatik.uni-bremen.de [134.102.201.11]) by mailhost.informatik.uni-bremen.de (8.14.5/8.14.5) with ESMTP id v2F7a6Ku022058 for <tools-discuss@ietf.org>; Wed, 15 Mar 2017 08:36:06 +0100 (CET)
Received: from [192.168.217.124] (p5DCCCDC2.dip0.t-ipconnect.de [93.204.205.194]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by submithost.informatik.uni-bremen.de (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 3vjk1L50HJzDHZD; Wed, 15 Mar 2017 08:36:06 +0100 (CET)
From: Carsten Bormann <cabo@tzi.org>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8"
X-Mao-Original-Outgoing-Id: 511256165.815693-a2a554d43fea7d101ee79fc4c9309be9
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Mime-Version: 1.0 (Mac OS X Mail 10.2 \(3259\))
Date: Wed, 15 Mar 2017 08:36:06 +0100
Message-Id: <E0C7D267-F536-4F11-A7A6-37B415870AEC@tzi.org>
To: tools-discuss <tools-discuss@ietf.org>
X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.3259)
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/tools-discuss/alTkjTZaPVdPgcpQsqgq4Jm2QfU>
Subject: [Tools-discuss] IEEE in bibxml2 vs. bibxml6
X-BeenThere: tools-discuss@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.22
Precedence: list
List-Id: IETF Tools Discussion <tools-discuss.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/tools-discuss>, <mailto:tools-discuss-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/tools-discuss/>
List-Post: <mailto:tools-discuss@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:tools-discuss-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/tools-discuss>, <mailto:tools-discuss-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 15 Mar 2017 07:36:14 -0000

There are IEEE citation files both in bibxml2 and bibxml6.
Is there a way to automatically decide with one to use?
Could the bibxml2 files maybe be copied over to bibxml6 so we can always use bibxml6 for IEEE?

(kramdown-rfc currently uses bibxml2 for IEEE; there is currently no easy way to access bibxml6.  I can’t switch that over to bibxml6, as the bibxml2 references are in use in existing documents, e.g. for IEEE 754.  Why are we even doing this splitting up?  90 % of the files are in bibxml3 anyway.)

Grüße, Carsten

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email