Re: [Tools-discuss] some more meetecho thoughts

Carsten Bormann <cabo@tzi.org> Fri, 12 March 2021 15:30 UTC

Return-Path: <cabo@tzi.org>
X-Original-To: tools-discuss@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: tools-discuss@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 49ACB3A1308 for <tools-discuss@ietfa.amsl.com>; Fri, 12 Mar 2021 07:30:08 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.919
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.919 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_H3=-0.01, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_WL=-0.01, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 2EWwYCZi1E43 for <tools-discuss@ietfa.amsl.com>; Fri, 12 Mar 2021 07:30:05 -0800 (PST)
Received: from gabriel-vm-2.zfn.uni-bremen.de (gabriel-vm-2.zfn.uni-bremen.de [134.102.50.17]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher AECDH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 2368A3A1300 for <tools-discuss@ietf.org>; Fri, 12 Mar 2021 07:30:05 -0800 (PST)
Received: from [192.168.217.118] (p5089a828.dip0.t-ipconnect.de [80.137.168.40]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by gabriel-vm-2.zfn.uni-bremen.de (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 4DxqWH2YLgzyf9; Fri, 12 Mar 2021 16:30:03 +0100 (CET)
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8
Mime-Version: 1.0 (Mac OS X Mail 13.4 \(3608.120.23.2.4\))
From: Carsten Bormann <cabo@tzi.org>
In-Reply-To: <10380.1615562014@localhost>
Date: Fri, 12 Mar 2021 16:30:02 +0100
Cc: tools-discuss@ietf.org
X-Mao-Original-Outgoing-Id: 637255802.8614579-c6f0b79526dc971381bc9dc7ffbd04fb
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Message-Id: <A38876D1-88B2-4E37-A26E-D89E3828C726@tzi.org>
References: <10380.1615562014@localhost>
To: Michael Richardson <mcr+ietf@sandelman.ca>
X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.3608.120.23.2.4)
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/tools-discuss/ao7uVhq1HB7uiRPctGaeTncrC7g>
Subject: Re: [Tools-discuss] some more meetecho thoughts
X-BeenThere: tools-discuss@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: IETF Tools Discussion <tools-discuss.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/tools-discuss>, <mailto:tools-discuss-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/tools-discuss/>
List-Post: <mailto:tools-discuss@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:tools-discuss-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/tools-discuss>, <mailto:tools-discuss-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 12 Mar 2021 15:30:08 -0000

On 2021-03-12, at 16:13, Michael Richardson <mcr+ietf@sandelman.ca> wrote:
> 
> 3) could chairs give presentation permission to a participant before they
>   ask? that seems to occupy 10s of back and forth in some meetings.
>   Yes, that's an interaction with (1).

(+1)

> 4) of course, doing it the BBB way, projecting PDF from a server, and
>   allowing the mouse to hover, even draw, is WAY better, so (1) above is
>   really only important if this isn't coming.

(+100)

> 5) I'd sure like to put all the video frames under my slides.
>   Others might disagree, but that seems to fit my screen real-estate better.
>   I want the slides bigger.

That’s interesting.  Normally our screens are too wide, so organizing things horizontally is the right thing.  But I need the CODIMD nodes to the right of the meetecho window, so I could indeed use the video streams below the slides.
Maybe make this responsive…

Grüße, Carsten