[Tools-discuss] Re: Collection of glitches on the nonwg mailing lists list
Toerless Eckert <tte@cs.fau.de> Wed, 05 June 2024 07:38 UTC
Return-Path: <eckert@i4.informatik.uni-erlangen.de>
X-Original-To: tools-discuss@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: tools-discuss@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6733DC14F68B for <tools-discuss@ietfa.amsl.com>; Wed, 5 Jun 2024 00:38:56 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.649
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.649 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, HEADER_FROM_DIFFERENT_DOMAINS=0.249, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001, URIBL_DBL_BLOCKED_OPENDNS=0.001, URIBL_ZEN_BLOCKED_OPENDNS=0.001] autolearn=no autolearn_force=no
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([50.223.129.194]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id Zv5_TeLTNFji for <tools-discuss@ietfa.amsl.com>; Wed, 5 Jun 2024 00:38:52 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from faui40.informatik.uni-erlangen.de (faui40.informatik.uni-erlangen.de [IPv6:2001:638:a000:4134::ffff:40]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits) key-exchange X25519 server-signature RSA-PSS (2048 bits) server-digest SHA256) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 8F699C14F5F3 for <tools-discuss@ietf.org>; Wed, 5 Jun 2024 00:38:50 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from faui48e.informatik.uni-erlangen.de (faui48e.informatik.uni-erlangen.de [IPv6:2001:638:a000:4134::ffff:51]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits) key-exchange X25519 server-signature RSA-PSS (4096 bits) server-digest SHA256) (No client certificate requested) by faui40.informatik.uni-erlangen.de (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 4VvK8M5bZSznkQ4; Wed, 5 Jun 2024 09:38:43 +0200 (CEST)
Received: by faui48e.informatik.uni-erlangen.de (Postfix, from userid 10463) id 4VvK8M4mpczkns7; Wed, 5 Jun 2024 09:38:43 +0200 (CEST)
Date: Wed, 05 Jun 2024 09:38:43 +0200
From: Toerless Eckert <tte@cs.fau.de>
To: John C Klensin <john-ietf@jck.com>
Message-ID: <ZmAWA-j_U-qJ7-y7@faui48e.informatik.uni-erlangen.de>
References: <BDC0BD8CA3C26B3F174FC1E8@PSB>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
Content-Disposition: inline
In-Reply-To: <BDC0BD8CA3C26B3F174FC1E8@PSB>
Message-ID-Hash: BNQ643BFP2JBWG3OS7VF3DIU4KM5WNOH
X-Message-ID-Hash: BNQ643BFP2JBWG3OS7VF3DIU4KM5WNOH
X-MailFrom: eckert@i4.informatik.uni-erlangen.de
X-Mailman-Rule-Misses: dmarc-mitigation; no-senders; approved; emergency; loop; banned-address; member-moderation; header-match-tools-discuss.ietf.org-0; nonmember-moderation; administrivia; implicit-dest; max-recipients; max-size; news-moderation; no-subject; digests; suspicious-header
CC: tools-discuss@ietf.org, Orie Steele <orie@transmute.industries>
X-Mailman-Version: 3.3.9rc4
Precedence: list
Subject: [Tools-discuss] Re: Collection of glitches on the nonwg mailing lists list
List-Id: IETF Tools Discussion <tools-discuss.ietf.org>
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/tools-discuss/azRZ_ASvRit4flteWc3i8IvoV_0>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/tools-discuss>
List-Help: <mailto:tools-discuss-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Owner: <mailto:tools-discuss-owner@ietf.org>
List-Post: <mailto:tools-discuss@ietf.org>
List-Subscribe: <mailto:tools-discuss-join@ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <mailto:tools-discuss-leave@ietf.org>
This ? On Tue, May 28, 2024 at 11:55:27AM -0500, Robert Sparks wrote: > We'll address it with the next datatracker release. > > https://github.com/ietf-tools/datatracker/issues/7477 > > RjS > > On 5/28/24 11:26 AM, Toerless Eckert wrote: > > [ Sorry if this is duplicate, i didn't track all recent messages to tools-discuss ] > > > > https://datatracker.ietf.org/list/nonwg uses links to the mailing lists without > > the full email address, e.g.: > > > > https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/Iot-onboarding > > https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/enterprise > > > > When the name of the mailing list is capitalized, as in the first example (Iot-onboarding), > > the behavior is weird: > > > > - The browser shows a "Page not found" page rendered by mailman3.ietf.org > > - The URL says https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/Iot-onboarding@ietf.org > > - aka: still capitalized, but now with the added @ietf.org > > > > When you then try to enter/load that page, it does actually load the right page > > but (of course) changes it to non-capitalized: > > > > - https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/Iot-onboarding@ietf.org > > > > > > Not sure how you tools folks want to fix this. One option seems to be to de-capitalize the 204 > > occurances of capital letters in those URLs in https://datatracker.ietf.org/list/nonwg. > > Or else make mailman3 do the decapitalization itself correctly.. > > > > Cheers > > Toerless On Tue, Jun 04, 2024 at 09:29:45PM -0400, John C Klensin wrote: > Sorry. While the message below was sent to tools-help as directed on > the relevant page, I have just discovered it is a more general > problem. Especially given Greg's recent note on the IETF list about > other Postorium/ Mailmain 3 issues, it may be worth warning others > and perhaps more general discussion. > > Apparently, if one goes to https://datatracker.ietf.org/list/nonwg (a > place some, I suspect many) of us go to track down information about > particular mailings lists, what they are called, and the location of > subscription information and archives, many of the entries have > broken links. In a non-trivial number of cases, the problem is that > the entry for list "foo" points to > https://mailman3.ietf.org/mailman3/lists/Foo@ietf.org/ where it > should point to > https://mailman3.ietf.org/mailman3/lists/foo@ietf.org/, where the > actual information is available. > > While "i18ndir", as discussed below, may be obscure, I note, as > particularly interesting, that > alldispatch > architecture-discuss > art > eligibility-discuss > gen-art > hotrfc > iab > i-d-announce > ietf-announce > ima > int-area > mib-doctors > mtgvenue > ops-area > rfp-announce > rsab > terminology > tools-help > tools-discuss > training-wgchairs > travel-grants-committee > tsv-art > wgguide > that is by no means a complete list but illustrates that the problem > spans a broad range of IETF Areas and IETF-related activities and > groups including the LLC, IAB, IRTF, and RFC Editor policies > (although RSWG does not appear on the list at all, something I think > has been noted previously). Many other lists work. I don't know if > they have been individually reported and patched or if there is some > pattern I cannot discern. > > But it is probably time, before we conclude that the transition to > Mailman3/ Postorius is complete, for someone to go through that page, > test all the links, and fix the ones that produce "no found" > errors... and do that before IETF 120 for which a subset of those > listed above (and maybe others) might be particularly important. > > Suggestion if that cannot be done Real Soon Now: It appears as if > there is a dedicated "page not found" catcher in Postorius because, > all of the bad links produce the same "Page not found": "This page > either doesn't exist, or it moved somewhere else." page. Can that > be modified to suggest that people inspect the URL that produced that > page and, if it contains upper-case characters, they experiment with > changing them to lower case and trying the URL again. I've tried > several, but not all, of the cases listed above and those that I > tried worked. Obviously not ideal, but better than leaving people > wondering and frustrated. > > More below about digging into a specific case and a few other > problems. > > best, > john > > > > --On Tuesday, June 4, 2024 20:11 -0400 John C Klensin > <john-ietf@jck.com> wrote: > > > Hi. > > On <https://datatracker.ietf.org/list/nonwg>, the entry for > > "i18ndir" points to > > <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/I18ndir>, which produces a > > "page not found" message. > > > > This appears to be another instance of a case-sensitivity problem > > because https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/i18ndir produces a > > relevant page. > > > > I'm uncertain about the status of that list. On the one hand, the > > directorate was closed some time ago. On the other, it might be > > the last useful centralized list for i18n discussions or, if there > > is another one, it should probably be reflected on the i18ndir page > > once it can be found in the obvious way. > > > > Also, IIR, while the directorate was active, directorate (and hence > > mailing list) membership was by invitation. This page seems to > > imply that anyone can now join, which might or might not be what is > > wanted. > > > > The ADs should probably make up their minds and then the link should > > be corrected and the mailing list page tweaked and/or the entry > > moved from the "nonWG" page to the "concluded" one. > > > > General suggestion to the tools team: Unless we have decided that > > the "owners" of a mailing list should be secret, it would be a good > > idea to list them, and maybe their addresses, on the mailing list > > pages. If we have decided their names are secret, I question that > > decision given that, e.g., we make WG Chair names and the like > > public. At worst, the names should be omitted only if list owners > > request that and get approval some someone like a relevant AD. > > > > Probably even more important, there have been enough problems with > > reaching people via ietf.org address aliases that, unless you are > > confident that those problems have been solved --now and forever-- > > identifying mailing list "owners" by name (and probably address) on > > the mailing list pages is particularly relevant. > > > > best, > > john > > > ----------------------------------------------- > Tools-discuss mailing list -- tools-discuss@ietf.org > To unsubscribe send an email to tools-discuss-leave@ietf.org > https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/tools-discuss/ -- --- tte@cs.fau.de
- [Tools-discuss] Collection of glitches on the non… John C Klensin
- [Tools-discuss] Re: Collection of glitches on the… Toerless Eckert
- [Tools-discuss] Re: Collection of glitches on the… Robert Sparks
- [Tools-discuss] Re: Collection of glitches on the… Robert Sparks