[Tools-discuss] Re: Reaching RFC authors
Brian E Carpenter <brian.e.carpenter@gmail.com> Sun, 18 August 2024 20:35 UTC
Return-Path: <brian.e.carpenter@gmail.com>
X-Original-To: tools-discuss@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: tools-discuss@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 370DFC14F61D for <tools-discuss@ietfa.amsl.com>; Sun, 18 Aug 2024 13:35:11 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2.106
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.106 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_EF=-0.1, FREEMAIL_FROM=0.001, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE=-0.0001, RCVD_IN_ZEN_BLOCKED_OPENDNS=0.001, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001, T_SCC_BODY_TEXT_LINE=-0.01, URIBL_DBL_BLOCKED_OPENDNS=0.001, URIBL_ZEN_BLOCKED_OPENDNS=0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=gmail.com
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([50.223.129.194]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id KRSLSPTpVa_n for <tools-discuss@ietfa.amsl.com>; Sun, 18 Aug 2024 13:35:07 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mail-io1-xd34.google.com (mail-io1-xd34.google.com [IPv6:2607:f8b0:4864:20::d34]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_128_GCM_SHA256 (128/128 bits) key-exchange X25519 server-signature ECDSA (P-256) server-digest SHA256) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 746FCC14F5F3 for <tools-discuss@ietf.org>; Sun, 18 Aug 2024 13:35:07 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by mail-io1-xd34.google.com with SMTP id ca18e2360f4ac-81f8f01981aso163221039f.2 for <tools-discuss@ietf.org>; Sun, 18 Aug 2024 13:35:07 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20230601; t=1724013306; x=1724618106; darn=ietf.org; h=content-transfer-encoding:in-reply-to:from:content-language :references:cc:to:subject:user-agent:mime-version:date:message-id :from:to:cc:subject:date:message-id:reply-to; bh=6p2g7vkxKbT3B9kD5gspDgawZIFarnd4ybcDfdAQGeg=; b=A6DGn+JmCi7q5GFXxBPSxH2Ihw/VpeXOgg80M5OD4iq35Eqs9307yOSNLa2fVA3ofy MsyOQFyotRRMVaO3Kl/UXFB79qRVU/Enc+9rW5dHB8suDbGskG/WFgf68ayioHxTkiKV EoB0mb2fWEYyowIAqDVR5tURQZS+qbCxuKA2AA/v//IRIY7gFLQMgKHH1x4vvZg+I168 ziedd5xwBx9aXwkFKFUHuRXEsehlY2nYuCLYzt+1PqQLGrLrzXLMYPYQDTIv7Husg5Yb jABeZ0JGQiODkPa1rPNoJCynTk86sNKWft+zaV1E+a9Kk4T09wSY6fxERVNXNxuxc0c5 xotQ==
X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20230601; t=1724013306; x=1724618106; h=content-transfer-encoding:in-reply-to:from:content-language :references:cc:to:subject:user-agent:mime-version:date:message-id :x-gm-message-state:from:to:cc:subject:date:message-id:reply-to; bh=6p2g7vkxKbT3B9kD5gspDgawZIFarnd4ybcDfdAQGeg=; b=CJqS+gPAYSlW+kjGw6cm/x/3oF/U/ykIpKUGCwDoE9NNN7x1UBC5/UzjXfl8cB3JZj LtnNsG1yV6Z97hC/GQah7/trphfj8NvsnW3Wg4MmLlWLFBi1QBgS91XcfIVX30E/gH8F ajMQynGbkP7oAl3m0NwOszs2bvZ7RgZFTsA1iWEmB2o2bJrkcJSgFSYVXnGVDWR20hyG pLYxDteDyQVcb1cvlUMcradCyH6nLZzQan0HRU4NBTMuYVbRMQITqo8IYOX/CPgquqv9 mouCV+Ph889cnlbXUsfEaW7+1+fSlsziyZEXRWD3ffTugHMFFa06wUZ6rO4Kw6BqpgqA 28Dg==
X-Gm-Message-State: AOJu0YxZ3nV4O0K/quwRU/vT9F+WO0beXmEGoqpjO7aiUqFAe0DLBNkm X1lZG/u+j97UkFEh+7as22UI4qiytydOCefGkU3clIPjvbf9RAED
X-Google-Smtp-Source: AGHT+IG8DXPfSQ1Z5qbJs8csYGfaH0jz0KuBpFi5nQYCBI6cYUgkNwNfzeQRC2x83P3cYrWXjyLyAQ==
X-Received: by 2002:a05:6602:2c82:b0:824:e428:adba with SMTP id ca18e2360f4ac-824f26b8e0bmr1177979239f.11.1724013306491; Sun, 18 Aug 2024 13:35:06 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from ?IPV6:2404:4400:541d:a600:44b7:2c2e:2bc6:8707? ([2404:4400:541d:a600:44b7:2c2e:2bc6:8707]) by smtp.gmail.com with ESMTPSA id 98e67ed59e1d1-2d3ac7f294esm9571011a91.34.2024.08.18.13.35.04 (version=TLS1_3 cipher=TLS_AES_128_GCM_SHA256 bits=128/128); Sun, 18 Aug 2024 13:35:06 -0700 (PDT)
Message-ID: <853e15b4-eb18-4be2-a2c0-a51cc657dae3@gmail.com>
Date: Mon, 19 Aug 2024 08:35:00 +1200
MIME-Version: 1.0
User-Agent: Mozilla Thunderbird
To: Michael Tuexen <michael.tuexen@lurchi.franken.de>
References: <872CECC7-FB7D-4540-B432-8B01A179C654@lurchi.franken.de> <20240818191023.3E2A891FBE9C@ary.qy> <17D074E1-3C89-4C5B-90FA-ABEBA1ADF65C@lurchi.franken.de>
Content-Language: en-US
From: Brian E Carpenter <brian.e.carpenter@gmail.com>
In-Reply-To: <17D074E1-3C89-4C5B-90FA-ABEBA1ADF65C@lurchi.franken.de>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"; format="flowed"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Message-ID-Hash: IQQLYCBEYPFRB6U4EGMUQUA6IFW26FIC
X-Message-ID-Hash: IQQLYCBEYPFRB6U4EGMUQUA6IFW26FIC
X-MailFrom: brian.e.carpenter@gmail.com
X-Mailman-Rule-Misses: dmarc-mitigation; no-senders; approved; emergency; loop; banned-address; member-moderation; header-match-tools-discuss.ietf.org-0; nonmember-moderation; administrivia; implicit-dest; max-recipients; max-size; news-moderation; no-subject; digests; suspicious-header
CC: tools-discuss@ietf.org, John Levine <johnl@taugh.com>
X-Mailman-Version: 3.3.9rc4
Precedence: list
Subject: [Tools-discuss] Re: Reaching RFC authors
List-Id: IETF Tools Discussion <tools-discuss.ietf.org>
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/tools-discuss/be8OPpK_OyBB0JstLosPP7WqWmY>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/tools-discuss>
List-Help: <mailto:tools-discuss-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Owner: <mailto:tools-discuss-owner@ietf.org>
List-Post: <mailto:tools-discuss@ietf.org>
List-Subscribe: <mailto:tools-discuss-join@ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <mailto:tools-discuss-leave@ietf.org>
Michael, you found a bug! That link works as intended for Internet-Drafts. If you look at https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/html/draft-ietf-tsvwg-rfc4960-bis-19, you will see a correct email link. You could report this using the "Report a datatracker bug" at the bottom of the sidebar. Regards Brian Carpenter On 19-Aug-24 07:31, Michael Tuexen wrote: >> On 18. Aug 2024, at 21:10, John Levine <johnl@taugh.com> wrote: >> >> It appears that Michael Tuexen <michael.tuexen@lurchi.franken.de> said: >>> is it intended that the authors of RFC n can be reached via the >>> email address rfcn@ietf.org <mailto:rfcn@ietf.org>, where n is the number of the RFC? >> >> No. > OK. Why is this link used at > https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/html/rfc9260 > when I click on the 'Email authors' button. If I click on it, > an e-mail with To address rfc9260@ietf.org <mailto:rfc9260@ietf.org> is generated, which > is rejected by the ietf.org <http://ietf.org/> server when sent. > This looks inconsistent to me... > > Best regards > Michael >> >> R's, >> John >> >> PS: We recently had a discussion related to this topic. You can try the author >> addresses in the RFC, and in some cases where addresses have changed, you can find >> newer addresses by looking them up in the mail archive or datatracker. In a few >> cases the RPC has newer addresses. >> >> Addresses like that with a simple regular pattern would be scraped by spambots in >> about ten seconds and so would need spam filters so fierce that they'd reject a >> lot of real mail, too. > > ----------------------------------------------- > Tools-discuss mailing list -- tools-discuss@ietf.org > To unsubscribe send an email to tools-discuss-leave@ietf.org > https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/tools-discuss/
- [Tools-discuss] Reaching RFC authors Michael Tuexen
- [Tools-discuss] Re: Reaching RFC authors John Levine
- [Tools-discuss] Re: Reaching RFC authors Michael Tuexen
- [Tools-discuss] Re: Reaching RFC authors S Moonesamy
- [Tools-discuss] Re: Reaching RFC authors Brian E Carpenter