Re: [Tools-discuss] "approve a draft" functionality for the IRTF?

Robert Sparks <rjsparks@nostrum.com> Wed, 24 April 2013 15:31 UTC

Return-Path: <rjsparks@nostrum.com>
X-Original-To: tools-discuss@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: tools-discuss@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3FAE021F8FEB for <tools-discuss@ietfa.amsl.com>; Wed, 24 Apr 2013 08:31:53 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -101.8
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-101.8 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-2.599, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, SARE_SUB_RAND_LETTRS4=0.799, SPF_PASS=-0.001, USER_IN_WHITELIST=-100]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([12.22.58.30]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id XYux3-RdpgiG for <tools-discuss@ietfa.amsl.com>; Wed, 24 Apr 2013 08:31:52 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from shaman.nostrum.com (nostrum-pt.tunnel.tserv2.fmt.ipv6.he.net [IPv6:2001:470:1f03:267::2]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 20B9221F8629 for <tools-discuss@ietf.org>; Wed, 24 Apr 2013 08:31:52 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from unnumerable.tekelec.com ([4.30.77.1]) (authenticated bits=0) by shaman.nostrum.com (8.14.3/8.14.3) with ESMTP id r3OFVlfH087117 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-CAMELLIA256-SHA bits=256 verify=OK) for <tools-discuss@ietf.org>; Wed, 24 Apr 2013 10:31:49 -0500 (CDT) (envelope-from rjsparks@nostrum.com)
Message-ID: <5177FAE5.30603@nostrum.com>
Date: Wed, 24 Apr 2013 10:31:49 -0500
From: Robert Sparks <rjsparks@nostrum.com>
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Macintosh; Intel Mac OS X 10.7; rv:17.0) Gecko/20130328 Thunderbird/17.0.5
MIME-Version: 1.0
To: tools-discuss@ietf.org
References: <6781EB8F-559E-47CA-B13B-0E5164C9B04A@netapp.com>
In-Reply-To: <6781EB8F-559E-47CA-B13B-0E5164C9B04A@netapp.com>
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="------------040001070508010400010101"
Received-SPF: pass (shaman.nostrum.com: 4.30.77.1 is authenticated by a trusted mechanism)
Subject: Re: [Tools-discuss] "approve a draft" functionality for the IRTF?
X-BeenThere: tools-discuss@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.12
Precedence: list
List-Id: IETF Tools Discussion <tools-discuss.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/tools-discuss>, <mailto:tools-discuss-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/tools-discuss>
List-Post: <mailto:tools-discuss@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:tools-discuss-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/tools-discuss>, <mailto:tools-discuss-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 24 Apr 2013 15:31:53 -0000

On 4/23/13 7:37 PM, Eggert, Lars wrote:
> Hi,
>
> is the IETF "approve a draft" functionality at https://datatracker.ietf.org/submit/approvals/ supposed to be in effect for IRTF submissions as well?
>
> I'm asking, because I have recently seen draft-irtf-burleigh-bibe been posted, which - I guess - was supposed to be an individual submission targeted at DTNRG, i.e., it should have been draft-burleigh-dtnrg-bibe-00.
>
> If the "approve a draft" function is not enabled for the IRTF, can it be turned on? It would avoid situations like this.
No, it wouldn't have.

That draft must have been manually posted?
The online submission tool would not have accepted it since there is no 
group "burleigh".
(From my test instance when trying to post draft-irtf-burleigh-bibe2-00, 
I get
----
Please correct the errors below.

     There is no active group with acronym 'burleigh', please rename 
your draft
----

However, I was able to post draft-irtf-dtnrg-burleigh-bibe2-00 to my 
test instance with no apparent check for -00 approval.
I'll enter a ticket to add that functionality.

RjS



>
> Thanks,
> Lars
> _______________________________________________
> Tools-discuss mailing list
> Tools-discuss@ietf.org
> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/tools-discuss