Re: [Tools-discuss] Important dates in upcoming.ics

Robert Sparks <rjsparks@nostrum.com> Tue, 09 February 2021 19:37 UTC

Return-Path: <rjsparks@nostrum.com>
X-Original-To: tools-discuss@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: tools-discuss@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id C27B93A1181 for <tools-discuss@ietfa.amsl.com>; Tue, 9 Feb 2021 11:37:47 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2.08
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.08 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_EF=-0.1, NICE_REPLY_A=-0.001, T_SPF_HELO_PERMERROR=0.01, T_SPF_PERMERROR=0.01, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (1024-bit key) header.d=nostrum.com
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 8iW_yU-NucK2 for <tools-discuss@ietfa.amsl.com>; Tue, 9 Feb 2021 11:37:45 -0800 (PST)
Received: from nostrum.com (raven-v6.nostrum.com [IPv6:2001:470:d:1130::1]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 1219D3A1173 for <tools-discuss@ietf.org>; Tue, 9 Feb 2021 11:37:45 -0800 (PST)
Received: from unformal.localdomain ([47.186.1.92]) (authenticated bits=0) by nostrum.com (8.16.1/8.16.1) with ESMTPSA id 119JbgEA060683 (version=TLSv1.3 cipher=TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 bits=256 verify=NO) for <tools-discuss@ietf.org>; Tue, 9 Feb 2021 13:37:43 -0600 (CST) (envelope-from rjsparks@nostrum.com)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=simple/simple; d=nostrum.com; s=default; t=1612899463; bh=Xcw05HpB66oXfzW2LEMlbgcXsf7nTFh38BhYuc4HNXs=; h=To:References:From:Subject:Date:In-Reply-To; b=HIx30klXffLlpibWtLf39rXXWzKh47Rcl5jTP47sQMbh2u41lBGiNwvhoyHjcp+CS QXBF4tG/ah6OYVAseOdh8HhH0Xjt8ZrnL4wJSCi6VsdXlnJ32bppT1YeWy5Yh/Er0z WMZzlIyiv3IKGbioYsfLjJxjMTDfeaQreuASjVIU=
X-Authentication-Warning: raven.nostrum.com: Host [47.186.1.92] claimed to be unformal.localdomain
To: tools-discuss@ietf.org
References: <7da79bcd-2931-4a0e-8f7e-3ba528fea0cc@nostrum.com> <20268.1612372060@localhost> <cac83fb6-2cbd-5037-e6d7-623d4e2c30b1@nostrum.com> <947.1612405162@localhost>
From: Robert Sparks <rjsparks@nostrum.com>
Message-ID: <15ea5446-3f90-b3bf-f10e-d3e5b58592fc@nostrum.com>
Date: Tue, 09 Feb 2021 13:37:37 -0600
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Macintosh; Intel Mac OS X 10.15; rv:78.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/78.7.1
MIME-Version: 1.0
In-Reply-To: <947.1612405162@localhost>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8"; format="flowed"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Content-Language: en-US
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/tools-discuss/dRNDG8pa2wGhKAz1Je6dXOGjicg>
Subject: Re: [Tools-discuss] Important dates in upcoming.ics
X-BeenThere: tools-discuss@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: IETF Tools Discussion <tools-discuss.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/tools-discuss>, <mailto:tools-discuss-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/tools-discuss/>
List-Post: <mailto:tools-discuss@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:tools-discuss-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/tools-discuss>, <mailto:tools-discuss-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 09 Feb 2021 19:37:48 -0000

On 2/3/21 8:19 PM, Michael Richardson wrote:
> Robert Sparks <rjsparks@nostrum.com> wrote:
>      >> I would like it if the upcoming.ics included the IESG Telechats and
>      >> other related things (LLC board, RTG area meetings, etc.).
>
>      > We could add these other things, but I think we would then need to add
>      > filters so people could select the information that they really want.
>
>      > I understand the general deconflicting use case.
>
>      > It will likely be a stretch to get LLC board meetings and the like into
>      > the datatracker - those are maintained in other systems.
>
>      > Area meetings on the other hand should just be interims - are they not
>      > being organized that way?
>
> No, because not all area meetings are WGs.
> IoTDIR, RtgDIR.

These things (review teams) are already configured to support meeting. 
They can schedule interims just like WG/RG can. So can area groups already.

If you find a group type that should be able manage meetings in the 
datatracker, but can't yet, let me know.

RjS

>
> I also got push back about asking RtgArea "Chats" being in a calendar.
> The result was conflicts.
>
> --
> ]               Never tell me the odds!                 | ipv6 mesh networks [
> ]   Michael Richardson, Sandelman Software Works        |    IoT architect   [
> ]     mcr@sandelman.ca  http://www.sandelman.ca/        |   ruby on rails    [
>
> ___________________________________________________________
> Tools-discuss mailing list - Tools-discuss@ietf.org
> This list is for discussion, not for action requests or bug reports.
> * Report datatracker and mailarchive bugs to: datatracker-project@ietf.org
> * Report tools.ietf.org bugs to: webmaster@tools.ietf.org
> * Report all other bugs or issues to: ietf-action@ietf.org
> List info (including how to Unsubscribe): https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/tools-discuss