Re: [Tools-discuss] bug in XML2RFC

Tom Pusateri <pusateri@bangj.com> Fri, 20 March 2020 23:57 UTC

Return-Path: <pusateri@bangj.com>
X-Original-To: tools-discuss@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: tools-discuss@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id A0C7F3A0F9D for <tools-discuss@ietfa.amsl.com>; Fri, 20 Mar 2020 16:57:54 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2.099
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.099 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_EF=-0.1, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=bangj.com
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id DDpV6tK85kXE for <tools-discuss@ietfa.amsl.com>; Fri, 20 Mar 2020 16:57:50 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from oj.bangj.com (69-77-154-174.static.skybest.com [69.77.154.174]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher AECDH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 8BB0E3A0F96 for <tools-discuss@ietf.org>; Fri, 20 Mar 2020 16:57:36 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from [172.16.10.175] (mta-107-13-246-59.nc.rr.com [107.13.246.59]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by oj.bangj.com (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 42A0339F3D; Fri, 20 Mar 2020 19:57:35 -0400 (EDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=bangj.com; s=201907; t=1584748655; bh=TZHXdz5VOyHa5r0l2gtejI/mSCK2fLnvA/+VX23/BFY=; h=From:Subject:Date:In-Reply-To:Cc:To:References:From; b=J3wMfynmiqynJYnWWLDgPfSXm59I5jgU+04ZmWuh14AN5gSEWlEg0Tw9fJWuNIJ58 /SWtjT5q/0EVKhjDYWjeBCTXYkVu3HJhx6JdqiPj3z9CpBjSfifAzrhOWx6e5H5GM8 dpKdXVHTbFiqiLyx6YoN+PEKCz7CsDp6Cjy7dkW1oaWbAO/Z+Li39nTe3+rgaGWHgS uFOqyfB/pvJpZwTPPB9Bwrzj2VU++wP+7BtOv2U47z1r2ob8FdTe2yG136s+rmHj5z DZrR+4dVEVvOzpIGastxnSM4/LgjsRShKkgW5SGo4vp6N0oDorsTfRec3xrOWfM/g3 /buRkCnIRd+fQ==
From: Tom Pusateri <pusateri@bangj.com>
Message-Id: <9F2F694D-0CE0-4EBB-BC7A-CA9BF6F50132@bangj.com>
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="Apple-Mail=_7CCF7232-0C50-4E97-9524-2A9CC079A9F6"
Mime-Version: 1.0 (Mac OS X Mail 13.0 \(3608.60.0.2.5\))
Date: Fri, 20 Mar 2020 19:57:34 -0400
In-Reply-To: <CADyWQ+EASzcHw_gC2=7LtdhhV7kmsVGbJOZh6gRQN-a9r=BTLg@mail.gmail.com>
Cc: Tools Team Discussion <tools-discuss@ietf.org>
To: Tim Wicinski <tjw.ietf@gmail.com>
References: <CADyWQ+Hx=4U0++aX6SbgpHsc8u378jCPdJcZRnVSALN7E+8nmw@mail.gmail.com> <CADyWQ+EASzcHw_gC2=7LtdhhV7kmsVGbJOZh6gRQN-a9r=BTLg@mail.gmail.com>
X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.3608.60.0.2.5)
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/tools-discuss/diRNwInTYGodXaqUoUrHdP_6crQ>
Subject: Re: [Tools-discuss] bug in XML2RFC
X-BeenThere: tools-discuss@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: IETF Tools Discussion <tools-discuss.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/tools-discuss>, <mailto:tools-discuss-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/tools-discuss/>
List-Post: <mailto:tools-discuss@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:tools-discuss-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/tools-discuss>, <mailto:tools-discuss-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 20 Mar 2020 23:57:55 -0000

Since the HTMLized versions are known to have issues and won’t be fixed, I think it’s time to deprecate the HTMLized versions when a HTML native version is available.

Let’s just not generate HTMLized in this case.

Tom

> On Mar 20, 2020, at 7:44 PM, Tim Wicinski <tjw.ietf@gmail.com> wrote:
> 
> Apologies, I was incorrect. The HTML version is correct:
> 
> https://www.ietf.org/id/draft-kucherawy-dmarc-dmarcbis-00.html <https://www.ietf.org/id/draft-kucherawy-dmarc-dmarcbis-00.html>
> 
> The "HTMLized" version contains some of the correct bits but fails to wrap the reference inside
> a <span> </span> 
> 
> https://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-kucherawy-dmarc-dmarcbis-00 <https://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-kucherawy-dmarc-dmarcbis-00>
> 
>   [<a name="ref-RFC3986" id="ref-RFC3986">RFC3986</a>]
> 
> I'm not sure where this bug falls actually. 
> 
> tim
> 
> On Fri, Mar 20, 2020 at 5:31 PM Tim Wicinski <tjw.ietf@gmail.com <mailto:tjw.ietf@gmail.com>> wrote:
> 
> It appears that xml2rfc has an issue if a new sentence starts with a reference. 
> 
> Please see https://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-kucherawy-dmarc-dmarcbis-00#page-17 <https://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-kucherawy-dmarc-dmarcbis-00#page-17>
> 
> The XML submitted contains
> 
> <section anchor="dmarc-uris"><name>DMARC URIs</name>
> <t><xref target="RFC3986"></xref> defines a generic syntax for identifying a resource.
> 
> tim
> 
> ___________________________________________________________
> Tools-discuss mailing list
> Tools-discuss@ietf.org
> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/tools-discuss
> 
> Please report datatracker.ietf.org and mailarchive.ietf.org
> bugs at http://tools.ietf.org/tools/ietfdb
> or send email to datatracker-project@ietf.org
> 
> Please report tools.ietf.org bugs at
> http://tools.ietf.org/tools/issues
> or send email to webmaster@tools.ietf.org