Re: [Tools-discuss] [111attendees] Why do we allow people to edit CodiMD meeting notes who are not logged in?

Would it be too large a step to make the sitewide default for new notes 
be "editable"?

Notes that need a lower bar (allowing anonymous access) for some reason 
could go explicitly change the setting.

RjS

On 8/1/21 10:47 AM, Carsten Bormann wrote:
> OK, so the summary of the 111attendees discussion is that we don’t want unauthenticated write access to meeting notes.  Less well-discussed is that the authorization rule is that anyone with a datatracker account has write access, but I think that implementing anything more granular (e.g., attendee status for the meeting that generated the minutes) would be actual work.
>
> The authorization rule seems to correspond to CodiMD’s “editable”, which is therefore the setting we should choose for meeting notes.  Whether we can do that automatically from the place where the meetings are assigned codimd names or have to do this manually is then a procedural thing to be discussed on tools-discuss.
>
> Grüße, Carsten
>
> ___________________________________________________________
> Tools-discuss mailing list - Tools-discuss@ietf.org
> This list is for discussion, not for action requests or bug reports.
> * Report datatracker and mailarchive bugs to: datatracker-project@ietf.org
> * Report tools.ietf.org bugs to: webmaster@tools.ietf.org
> * Report all other bugs or issues to: ietf-action@ietf.org
> List info (including how to Unsubscribe): https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/tools-discuss