[Tools-discuss] Re: Automated mail on call for adoption and working group last call
Tim Wicinski <tjw.ietf@gmail.com> Sun, 24 August 2025 17:50 UTC
Return-Path: <tjw.ietf@gmail.com>
X-Original-To: tools-discuss@mail2.ietf.org
Delivered-To: tools-discuss@mail2.ietf.org
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by mail2.ietf.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id AF10F5847C89; Sun, 24 Aug 2025 10:50:08 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at ietf.org
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2.098
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.098 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_EF=-0.1, FREEMAIL_FROM=0.001, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE=-0.0001, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=unavailable autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: mail2.ietf.org (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=gmail.com
Received: from mail2.ietf.org ([166.84.6.31]) by localhost (mail2.ietf.org [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 8frPpq-grIqI; Sun, 24 Aug 2025 10:50:08 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mail-ed1-x533.google.com (mail-ed1-x533.google.com [IPv6:2a00:1450:4864:20::533]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_128_GCM_SHA256 (128/128 bits) key-exchange X25519 server-signature ECDSA (P-256) server-digest SHA256) (No client certificate requested) by mail2.ietf.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 56F4E5847C82; Sun, 24 Aug 2025 10:50:08 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by mail-ed1-x533.google.com with SMTP id 4fb4d7f45d1cf-61c38da68ddso2773219a12.2; Sun, 24 Aug 2025 10:50:08 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20230601; t=1756057806; x=1756662606; darn=ietf.org; h=cc:to:subject:message-id:date:from:in-reply-to:references :mime-version:from:to:cc:subject:date:message-id:reply-to; bh=8v8suUuQbyiL3NlmCTm6C/diCZtrbYT6WHyn4YWynGk=; b=b2g+5VlS9XFJyRHzbhvbWi+9AWuz7BKsAAXGmb3oYfdxpSXMlX1Q4BoeOW6NIDf+Ux JTLlVjloSohEGI0DHIR0Hq7r6DsPmOtcYC5GT8WV1WQSffNpFuDAl6HVR501oDW8t0j/ A4gfHFTsSgPJvihdA4nt4IdUmMDDRbzU8/+Eauzmjx3yAGJ0eEp4aHTbJ5ax3bg7uN2R bs6ihu8X/fRFU61PoYmVZSO2FreVv4PrUU/TxJpSD9LuuKCgFuNFFdsdM6xW+72FF93v 9fFRZlAiPOHtSdFuFiYsXj+PRuba0jfpqPjScVLlZdWGcgy712xKKxM0c4WigW+lc3Ko ODvA==
X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20230601; t=1756057806; x=1756662606; h=cc:to:subject:message-id:date:from:in-reply-to:references :mime-version:x-gm-message-state:from:to:cc:subject:date:message-id :reply-to; bh=8v8suUuQbyiL3NlmCTm6C/diCZtrbYT6WHyn4YWynGk=; b=fPkSS+h6BkOXoiWOnqUK/ysAxJc0QayJwxGhNKACutjKXsqpVZY7jUFXxxQCJOCtkW P0/e2LSMPungkZ5rVMZsOQZHJhZXCo5yCdCyRzkG5gwfRmq3ebrJ0SKmhJxIYhcY8HKA rP9VPzDlLP9uV0rSUbRNGMCHW4ei2RjdvD0XhFfBiH3k4IM8EDqdFlJEmRfrNF4cG8A7 DkTwTlWbXKY48qu2eF8pjtFZB1LjXq2R/GHDJvbPLSFpN0xsCdPvXcMkCRBMvXni5JEL 8+khSE5WapsIZS74ExKtASeM+tvWQXsOrASR4owaG1xkeT2GZz+a3dhHS1feGKRyGZEM fd0Q==
X-Forwarded-Encrypted: i=1; AJvYcCU0RuzmlO9OkHWWkj4p+boU3hZAb/SJun7I4UJeRcbBt9PeB9OJpn7SsHGwoYbIoHVRKaUOtltZyQ==@ietf.org
X-Gm-Message-State: AOJu0YyeMt3E/LPHJbu45zFz8d1AKUc3cU+lzcdG6M67/dJ06iQpCEx6 QX0LIIUfIXq35IPJ2K/WkgcEWD+M3rFG81LngB/EVldc2smJLR6B7ZsmKUxWCX6EAFG8p+lvv2C Q+lzcU44OQ0ytHo3+HbIztEonvrb+MvA=
X-Gm-Gg: ASbGncsldCPTZvN9LnjYFH+AeM7uGDv5xlCo7enbxWEHzOkRoDwLycXG0fgmXgup/o5 lSwk2Z4HYag6gcZdOFxn2duVcjUa9V4kPG/VLjUCjcZdk8lH7wlh1dk5Jh5rCCNNuUJOZJn/qtS QMjx9xLTeMw9qA0Gtj7ZsMWiXEpLOZjp1QHuDiyVm+S8Wa5GJhhLTnEnTa2P55RIZ9WWAwPywDN QjnmJrkFpy8GKs6PMgM3m5nmz5+pWtIProqmEnyZ1953o8Kd8JDqFtkwmPPm/omfp8=
X-Google-Smtp-Source: AGHT+IGnrEsy/BJzySWiNXSlbz6gp1TfAv4XWFDxfnPVf0eYWPTaqr+O+9MHtcg+0Z6lg3bAtyP78Pvjh3Jg3bVtQ2g=
X-Received: by 2002:a05:6402:5110:b0:61c:2762:10e with SMTP id 4fb4d7f45d1cf-61c276208edmr6263257a12.32.1756057806117; Sun, 24 Aug 2025 10:50:06 -0700 (PDT)
MIME-Version: 1.0
References: <9420de32-95a4-4c50-b59a-b28bcefdca3a@nostrum.com> <3D8EB8DF-F5B4-439C-B4CA-1A3F00C61BD5@mnot.net>
In-Reply-To: <3D8EB8DF-F5B4-439C-B4CA-1A3F00C61BD5@mnot.net>
From: Tim Wicinski <tjw.ietf@gmail.com>
Date: Sun, 24 Aug 2025 13:49:54 -0400
X-Gm-Features: Ac12FXzyQmN8yR0s0ulf3WuQwsXitpEgmR2LJ6CED-sZMLnrY1rP54Q_T5FvuyA
Message-ID: <CADyWQ+Hj2sN3-x4cbk3HJmbFrP-78QRav7w+Xj-2=ECEDiu5PA@mail.gmail.com>
To: Mark Nottingham <mnot=40mnot.net@dmarc.ietf.org>
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="000000000000bd1e61063d2011b9"
Message-ID-Hash: POUY72MQIPDBYLYSZXRX6YWZG32MUMDS
X-Message-ID-Hash: POUY72MQIPDBYLYSZXRX6YWZG32MUMDS
X-MailFrom: tjw.ietf@gmail.com
X-Mailman-Rule-Misses: dmarc-mitigation; no-senders; approved; emergency; loop; banned-address; member-moderation; header-match-tools-discuss.ietf.org-0; nonmember-moderation; administrivia; implicit-dest; max-recipients; max-size; news-moderation; no-subject; digests; suspicious-header
CC: Tools Team Discussion <tools-discuss@ietf.org>, "wgchairs@ietf.org" <wgchairs@ietf.org>
X-Mailman-Version: 3.3.9rc6
Precedence: list
Subject: [Tools-discuss] Re: Automated mail on call for adoption and working group last call
List-Id: IETF Tools Discussion <tools-discuss.ietf.org>
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/tools-discuss/fV9lcwBXThi76iIbEd0RXcdp1Nc>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/tools-discuss>
List-Help: <mailto:tools-discuss-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Owner: <mailto:tools-discuss-owner@ietf.org>
List-Post: <mailto:tools-discuss@ietf.org>
List-Subscribe: <mailto:tools-discuss-join@ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <mailto:tools-discuss-leave@ietf.org>
I second Mark's request for a mailing list/RSS feed one can subscribe to. I remember I hope this encourages more WGs to use the datatracker to track adoption/wglc calls. tim On Fri, Aug 22, 2025 at 7:42 PM Mark Nottingham <mnot= 40mnot.net@dmarc.ietf.org> wrote: > Great stuff! > > It would be really cool to have e-mail lists that one could subscribe to > just for these notifications, both IETF-wide and per-area. > > Bonus points: RSS feeds. > > Cheers, > > > > On 23 Aug 2025, at 8:23 am, Robert Sparks <rjsparks@nostrum.com> wrote: > > > > Chairs - > > > > The IESG asked that the datatracker send email automatically when a > group puts a document into the WG state of "call for adoption issued" or > "working group last call issued". That change was part of yesterday's > datatracker deployment. It surprised at least one chair, for which I > apologize. > > > > To see the details, look at > > > > https://github.com/ietf-tools/datatracker/issues/9142 (the request from > the IESG) > > > > and > > > > https://github.com/ietf-tools/datatracker/pull/9322 (the PR from a > volunteer that added the functionality). > > > > If you have use cases like the one Bob Hinden ran afoul of (going and > adding the state to the datatracker long after the actual call had been > issued) for which the current implementation will cause you trouble, please > open an issue or send mail to tools-discuss. I'll make sure the IESG > follows the discussion. > > > > RjS > > > > -- > Mark Nottingham https://www.mnot.net/ > >
- [Tools-discuss] Re: Automated mail on call for ad… Mark Nottingham
- [Tools-discuss] Re: Automated mail on call for ad… Tim Wicinski
- [Tools-discuss] Re: Automated mail on call for ad… Bob Hinden
- [Tools-discuss] Re: Automated mail on call for ad… Robert Sparks
- [Tools-discuss] Re: Automated mail on call for ad… Rifaat Shekh-Yusef
- [Tools-discuss] Re: Automated mail on call for ad… Robert Sparks
- [Tools-discuss] Re: Automated mail on call for ad… Bob Hinden
- [Tools-discuss] Re: Automated mail on call for ad… Rifaat Shekh-Yusef
- [Tools-discuss] Re: Automated mail on call for ad… Toerless Eckert
- [Tools-discuss] Re: Automated mail on call for ad… Tero Kivinen
- [Tools-discuss] Re: Automated mail on call for ad… Pete Resnick
- [Tools-discuss] Re: Automated mail on call for ad… Nour Almaani