IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [Tools-discuss] Replacement status set during I-D submission

Robert Sparks <rjsparks@nostrum.com> Mon, 01 April 2019 15:37 UTC

Return-Path: <rjsparks@nostrum.com>
X-Original-To: tools-discuss@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: tools-discuss@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0F8A3120119 for <tools-discuss@ietfa.amsl.com>; Mon, 1 Apr 2019 08:37:37 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.679
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.679 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_INVALID=0.1, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, T_SPF_HELO_PERMERROR=0.01, T_SPF_PERMERROR=0.01, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001] autolearn=no autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=fail (1024-bit key) reason="fail (message has been altered)" header.d=nostrum.com
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id asGlop1FKYrf for <tools-discuss@ietfa.amsl.com>; Mon, 1 Apr 2019 08:37:35 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from nostrum.com (raven-v6.nostrum.com [IPv6:2001:470:d:1130::1]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 88C8E12018C for <tools-discuss@ietf.org>; Mon, 1 Apr 2019 08:37:32 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from unescapeable.local ([47.186.39.7]) (authenticated bits=0) by nostrum.com (8.15.2/8.15.2) with ESMTPSA id x31FbFMo086660 (version=TLSv1.2 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 bits=128 verify=NO); Mon, 1 Apr 2019 10:37:16 -0500 (CDT) (envelope-from rjsparks@nostrum.com)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=simple/simple; d=nostrum.com; s=default; t=1554133037; bh=Njpaq7fUUUOJJfD8dfJZSt83IaTnfeB/jttgpcVCCD8=; h=Subject:To:References:From:Date:In-Reply-To; b=OJXecRhAjJb8RWnDbAIhntLtsUpxELXulv+oHoCgoUo1ofPLlSs+RHaOj+PsOT0FE AH5vI7I2DHC07YDQfuvmVFIMg22p5D6Q6owNCS8sGB4w6WYa5UHcQ2vgdbk43TilgI 4XBZAeaz1fZa7OeX2vhF/HelJc2LyWULGtzfGZvE=
X-Authentication-Warning: raven.nostrum.com: Host [47.186.39.7] claimed to be unescapeable.local
To: S Moonesamy <sm+ietf@elandsys.com>, Russ Housley <housley@vigilsec.com>, tools-discuss@ietf.org
References: <6.2.5.6.2.20190331092923.0c953848@elandnews.com> <FED40295-9754-4B97-B6EF-D4704329185B@vigilsec.com> <6.2.5.6.2.20190331100437.0ba594b0@elandnews.com>
From: Robert Sparks <rjsparks@nostrum.com>
Message-ID: <e1e8d37e-8f64-4744-8324-8965c1baa8eb@nostrum.com>
Date: Mon, 01 Apr 2019 10:37:14 -0500
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Macintosh; Intel Mac OS X 10.12; rv:60.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/60.6.1
MIME-Version: 1.0
In-Reply-To: <6.2.5.6.2.20190331100437.0ba594b0@elandnews.com>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8"; format="flowed"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
Content-Language: en-US
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/tools-discuss/gPeaZaHd7qFA0qMgilH4oUj5xMI>
Subject: Re: [Tools-discuss] Replacement status set during I-D submission
X-BeenThere: tools-discuss@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: IETF Tools Discussion <tools-discuss.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/tools-discuss>, <mailto:tools-discuss-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/tools-discuss/>
List-Post: <mailto:tools-discuss@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:tools-discuss-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/tools-discuss>, <mailto:tools-discuss-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 01 Apr 2019 15:37:37 -0000

I suspect the problem you ran into was pasting 
"draft-klensin-recal-rev-00" into the replaces field in the submission 
form (which will not work). Others have run into that, and there is an 
outstanding ticket to improve the way the form behaves. See 
<https://trac.tools.ietf.org/tools/ietfdb/ticket/1375>

What would have worked was "draft-klensin-recal-rev".

The most recent codesprint added more documentation to the field to help 
others avoid that problem.

I think the control still could use more work to make it less likely 
that others run afoul of this.

For this draft, you can send a note to the secretariat asking them to 
add the replaces relationship.

RjS

On 3/31/19 12:12 PM, S Moonesamy wrote:
> Hi Russ,
> At 09:57 AM 31-03-2019, Russ Housley wrote:
>> If only the rev number is changing, the "replaces" should not be 
>> used.  The "replaces" is used to indicate an older file name, and it 
>> is most commonly used to indicate that an individual draft has been 
>> adopted by a WG.
>
> Thanks for the explanation.  I attempted a "Replaces" for 
> draft-klensin-recall-rev-00.   Does the datatracker cater for that 
> given that the two drafts are not WG documents?
>
> Regards,
> S. Moonesamy
> ___________________________________________________________
> Tools-discuss mailing list
> Tools-discuss@ietf.org
> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/tools-discuss
>
> Please report datatracker.ietf.org and mailarchive.ietf.org
> bugs at http://tools.ietf.org/tools/ietfdb
> or send email to datatracker-project@ietf.org
>
> Please report tools.ietf.org bugs at
> http://tools.ietf.org/tools/issues
> or send email to webmaster@tools.ietf.org

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email