IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [Tools-discuss] The future of "Interim" meetings

"Ciavaglia, Laurent (Nokia - FR/Paris-Saclay)" <laurent.ciavaglia@nokia.com> Wed, 15 April 2020 13:38 UTC

Return-Path: <laurent.ciavaglia@nokia.com>
X-Original-To: tools-discuss@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: tools-discuss@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6DE803A07BA for <tools-discuss@ietfa.amsl.com>; Wed, 15 Apr 2020 06:38:37 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2.068
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.068 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIMWL_WL_HIGH=-0.168, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, SPF_PASS=-0.001, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001] autolearn=unavailable autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (1024-bit key) header.d=nokia.onmicrosoft.com
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id MkYL20fsxcth for <tools-discuss@ietfa.amsl.com>; Wed, 15 Apr 2020 06:38:35 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from FRA01-PR2-obe.outbound.protection.outlook.com (mail-eopbgr120130.outbound.protection.outlook.com [40.107.12.130]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id C59CB3A07B5 for <tools-discuss@ietf.org>; Wed, 15 Apr 2020 06:38:34 -0700 (PDT)
ARC-Seal: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; s=arcselector9901; d=microsoft.com; cv=none; b=hyQlt1SHXQiixVpcbsxn4hvyhOrqbBJ4exUDcOBKVWO5aPF7Y8heALBXLb1UUUahoNTonEP8QvhA+j47N1smFTkgYM0bC4QG6JBu8cAtoamWFQyxyFiJAOnUjo1G26BIroTQ5gTD12dyDBUOGSE8r2bBiUh0E4WeUpfbMtKzoS1S+9achzbbKg4+aE1bDRf6Ay89Bmd/5mahwyGQl4Wa8S9BzvEB3ajcGX7h422Hf1dPgKDn19MSMdEc8boBdcLZM84viQKbkIqfllnifyC+9j0rAsmLMmoe4DaMkY36IrCLZ6WpSUl7J2AoV4RUTndYNzrrKW6ajud+E9sEquroVw==
ARC-Message-Signature: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=microsoft.com; s=arcselector9901; h=From:Date:Subject:Message-ID:Content-Type:MIME-Version:X-MS-Exchange-SenderADCheck; bh=mn0ALG9VGUPFXEQ3I39rjD4pBhR+DbGATNyOG2vQQ1c=; b=bOkAyyOXEe/Im0oqW5k9+Gd3UJpac36lkUeb8S40lLWaIJi3eZaflKQGfD8YMjHj15erQr+q9eAVrLj0CXhHLynWW68gZ2rvvEblOvgNjZfqoTzkitDyW+2BSuGYWMP+NlILHJnMGbBoTXU7kSVzRlCpbUlf4CEujlzaq/kBbvkgdiBRFWTxhR46vVB1OOH9t47ojt538LJx5r+O5LLom6Gn8q8YKy4QD4Bsua0n7NNZtmd3v4+Ucm/Q/dSjBbR5bk7YmjfIWxSZB5agC4D7uITMRgKLYwPSsuJsHt0UsilbBEiGqPeRMj6Itd0oU84VTfMlnI0ucqra27itzs6mDg==
ARC-Authentication-Results: i=1; mx.microsoft.com 1; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=nokia.com; dmarc=pass action=none header.from=nokia.com; dkim=pass header.d=nokia.com; arc=none
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=nokia.onmicrosoft.com; s=selector1-nokia-onmicrosoft-com; h=From:Date:Subject:Message-ID:Content-Type:MIME-Version:X-MS-Exchange-SenderADCheck; bh=mn0ALG9VGUPFXEQ3I39rjD4pBhR+DbGATNyOG2vQQ1c=; b=OIggVBJj/kVa0TmyLs+zmshnw6wCpyV0z2Rpvwe4yYj2JMT20q9Zgmjiqt7UXHYddzes9y5hPMK7oyVYGmMKQOd1GWxHjB7Nad4hN0tA7bz1qb1DRPbvZABA9xH34J3Q1sa5SoIKveSLsWUuZXwCOu3StX2bNOB1EkTpJ6LRneY=
Received: from PR1PR07MB4891.eurprd07.prod.outlook.com (2603:10a6:102:2::18) by PR1PR07MB4907.eurprd07.prod.outlook.com (2603:10a6:102:12::14) with Microsoft SMTP Server (version=TLS1_2, cipher=TLS_ECDHE_RSA_WITH_AES_256_GCM_SHA384) id 15.20.2921.24; Wed, 15 Apr 2020 13:38:32 +0000
Received: from PR1PR07MB4891.eurprd07.prod.outlook.com ([fe80::c61:7804:6733:8e5e]) by PR1PR07MB4891.eurprd07.prod.outlook.com ([fe80::c61:7804:6733:8e5e%3]) with mapi id 15.20.2921.024; Wed, 15 Apr 2020 13:38:32 +0000
From: "Ciavaglia, Laurent (Nokia - FR/Paris-Saclay)" <laurent.ciavaglia@nokia.com>
To: Carsten Bormann <cabo@tzi.org>, Tom Pusateri <pusateri=40bangj.com@dmarc.ietf.org>
CC: Tools Team Discussion <tools-discuss@ietf.org>
Thread-Topic: [Tools-discuss] The future of "Interim" meetings
Thread-Index: AQHWEr8DpaWa/uvLR0iS0XHIQbcVAah5vjaAgABwLBA=
Date: Wed, 15 Apr 2020 13:38:32 +0000
Message-ID: <PR1PR07MB48917D57385D42425CF828FEF3DB0@PR1PR07MB4891.eurprd07.prod.outlook.com>
References: <0486D87E-5655-4535-8D59-4BD56EE628E2@bangj.com> <F259C97D-080C-49E7-92AC-B48D50ECEF2B@tzi.org>
In-Reply-To: <F259C97D-080C-49E7-92AC-B48D50ECEF2B@tzi.org>
Accept-Language: en-US
Content-Language: en-US
X-MS-Has-Attach:
X-MS-TNEF-Correlator:
authentication-results: spf=none (sender IP is ) smtp.mailfrom=laurent.ciavaglia@nokia.com;
x-originating-ip: [176.130.37.253]
x-ms-publictraffictype: Email
x-ms-office365-filtering-ht: Tenant
x-ms-office365-filtering-correlation-id: 2a3e3c47-6b75-4f1c-9d38-08d7e1424a2b
x-ms-traffictypediagnostic: PR1PR07MB4907:
x-microsoft-antispam-prvs: <PR1PR07MB4907DC82CCA449644E0D0523F3DB0@PR1PR07MB4907.eurprd07.prod.outlook.com>
x-ms-oob-tlc-oobclassifiers: OLM:9508;
x-forefront-prvs: 0374433C81
x-forefront-antispam-report: CIP:255.255.255.255; CTRY:; LANG:en; SCL:1; SRV:; IPV:NLI; SFV:NSPM; H:PR1PR07MB4891.eurprd07.prod.outlook.com; PTR:; CAT:NONE; SFTY:; SFS:(10019020)(4636009)(396003)(136003)(39860400002)(376002)(346002)(366004)(110136005)(76116006)(33656002)(66946007)(6506007)(53546011)(64756008)(66556008)(66476007)(66446008)(86362001)(71200400001)(7696005)(316002)(8936002)(55016002)(2906002)(19273905006)(186003)(26005)(52536014)(4326008)(81156014)(5660300002)(966005)(478600001)(8676002)(9686003)(563064011); DIR:OUT; SFP:1102;
received-spf: None (protection.outlook.com: nokia.com does not designate permitted sender hosts)
x-ms-exchange-senderadcheck: 1
x-microsoft-antispam: BCL:0;
x-microsoft-antispam-message-info: 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
x-ms-exchange-antispam-messagedata: kFhtwSRr3wbjeMlqTJyrkWgg+HSZ3z1ETDLX3MSLSbtFSj37uKDAmbZUfUbH5+BEWHwkMIMANTCZhKDamrFoATBw56BcK0JI+rJRngav4fHPyiq6jPWrYIvR36ykNNthERb5xEiNjeNtRe3X6flJBQ==
x-ms-exchange-transport-forked: True
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: base64
MIME-Version: 1.0
X-OriginatorOrg: nokia.com
X-MS-Exchange-CrossTenant-Network-Message-Id: 2a3e3c47-6b75-4f1c-9d38-08d7e1424a2b
X-MS-Exchange-CrossTenant-originalarrivaltime: 15 Apr 2020 13:38:32.3868 (UTC)
X-MS-Exchange-CrossTenant-fromentityheader: Hosted
X-MS-Exchange-CrossTenant-id: 5d471751-9675-428d-917b-70f44f9630b0
X-MS-Exchange-CrossTenant-mailboxtype: HOSTED
X-MS-Exchange-CrossTenant-userprincipalname: DaYih0VJqcfSdF1ysYYkgvEpRNPzaPu36uOeVHvN3gmnRK5oq66UP9j+HM+k+0EPDEfQolGv7Uf+67mJb9jLX5DH7bfvVyCndapANlDuX9o=
X-MS-Exchange-Transport-CrossTenantHeadersStamped: PR1PR07MB4907
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/tools-discuss/yoVU5z9mcVq3XlLaApWtdIkszZA>
Subject: Re: [Tools-discuss] The future of "Interim" meetings
X-BeenThere: tools-discuss@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: IETF Tools Discussion <tools-discuss.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/tools-discuss>, <mailto:tools-discuss-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/tools-discuss/>
List-Post: <mailto:tools-discuss@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:tools-discuss-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/tools-discuss>, <mailto:tools-discuss-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 15 Apr 2020 13:38:38 -0000

Hello,

If we're going to continue or increase us of virtual WG/RG(/side) meetings for some time, then conflict management or some form of planning coordination would become more crucial.

This could eventually be implemented by enabling the functionality offered for the in-person meeting requests to the virtual meeting requests form.

In addition, a proactive (~2 weeks lead time), automated posting on the relevant *-announce + WG/RG mailing lists of the consolidated agenda for the upcoming 2-3 weeks would also be a useful stuff.

Best regards, Laurent. 

> -----Original Message-----
> From: Tools-discuss <tools-discuss-bounces@ietf.org> On Behalf Of Carsten
> Bormann
> Sent: Wednesday, April 15, 2020 08:48
> To: Tom Pusateri <pusateri=40bangj.com@dmarc.ietf.org>
> Cc: Tools Team Discussion <tools-discuss@ietf.org>
> Subject: Re: [Tools-discuss] The future of "Interim" meetings
> 
> On 2020-04-15, at 02:44, Tom Pusateri
> <pusateri=40bangj.com@dmarc.ietf.org> wrote:
> >
> > I'm thinking of presenting these sessions in weekly collections and
> ignoring the current "meeting" classification with one session per
> meeting. I will create a pseudo meeting for "Week of April 13" and "Week
> of April 20", etc.
> 
> Works for me.
> 
> My thinking is that we are in the “107+” meeting up to April 28th, because
> those were all time slots assigned by the secretariat.  But this is not
> much less arbitrary than going per week, and it requires some additional
> input.  (But then, note that some WGs have two sessions in 107+, not
> necessarily in the same week, with a common agenda spanning the two
> sessions.)
> 
> Grüße, Carsten
> 
> ___________________________________________________________
> Tools-discuss mailing list
> Tools-discuss@ietf.org
> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/tools-discuss
> 
> Please report datatracker.ietf.org and mailarchive.ietf.org
> bugs at http://tools.ietf.org/tools/ietfdb
> or send email to datatracker-project@ietf.org
> 
> Please report tools.ietf.org bugs at
> http://tools.ietf.org/tools/issues
> or send email to webmaster@tools.ietf.org

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email