Re: [Tools-discuss] Where are the IETF draft XML and TXT ?

Lars Eggert <lars@eggert.org> Wed, 16 June 2021 15:09 UTC

Return-Path: <lars@eggert.org>
X-Original-To: tools-discuss@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: tools-discuss@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id A38183A1BDD for <tools-discuss@ietfa.amsl.com>; Wed, 16 Jun 2021 08:09:00 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2.098
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.098 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_EF=-0.1, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_BLOCKED=0.001, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (1024-bit key) header.d=eggert.org
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id cj0oObj7bdON for <tools-discuss@ietfa.amsl.com>; Wed, 16 Jun 2021 08:08:55 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mail.eggert.org (mail.eggert.org [IPv6:2a00:ac00:4000:400:211:32ff:fe22:186f]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 885963A1BE0 for <tools-discuss@ietf.org>; Wed, 16 Jun 2021 08:08:55 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from smtpclient.apple (85-76-51-31-nat.elisa-mobile.fi [85.76.51.31]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by mail.eggert.org (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 191D160031C; Wed, 16 Jun 2021 18:08:45 +0300 (EEST)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=eggert.org; s=dkim; t=1623856126; bh=Elsc2tpL+27P2xj3brIL0QDuTVa8v+SrxT3medxdbo4=; h=From:Subject:Date:In-Reply-To:Cc:To:References; b=PChOO5PU3xr52Kph0JILsQFlLlyy/pPST4MWrhROXz6SQz3gpY2Kz/DzrIis1/igs sNKCWJlRcktc1gGKroWDsHVHD1GWZ8XaNNujitMHZyqB8ize1CVYHGx2YHqscPwNdA xF9y3aDRnnB7qX9wjK0FqWYhcxGtMBQ/CxPlVw38=
From: Lars Eggert <lars@eggert.org>
Message-Id: <DE8105D3-1F0E-4256-A283-DF3A3287DE65@eggert.org>
Content-Type: multipart/signed; boundary="Apple-Mail=_882DB9DF-7E36-4342-A756-D1D1205A18AA"; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; micalg=pgp-sha512
Mime-Version: 1.0 (Mac OS X Mail 14.0 \(3654.100.0.2.22\))
Date: Wed, 16 Jun 2021 18:08:44 +0300
In-Reply-To: <20210616145132.GC12022@faui48e.informatik.uni-erlangen.de>
Cc: Julian Reschke <julian.reschke@gmx.de>, tools-discuss@ietf.org
To: Toerless Eckert <tte@cs.fau.de>
References: <20210616141843.GZ12022@faui48e.informatik.uni-erlangen.de> <5b5ce7ea-8af2-9f86-9125-5a82a3fea02d@gmx.de> <20210616145132.GC12022@faui48e.informatik.uni-erlangen.de>
X-MailScanner-ID: 191D160031C.A1451
X-MailScanner: Found to be clean
X-MailScanner-From: lars@eggert.org
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/tools-discuss/ho7_ohauLTtQyjeyLTWzj4Figls>
Subject: Re: [Tools-discuss] Where are the IETF draft XML and TXT ?
X-BeenThere: tools-discuss@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: IETF Tools Discussion <tools-discuss.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/tools-discuss>, <mailto:tools-discuss-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/tools-discuss/>
List-Post: <mailto:tools-discuss@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:tools-discuss-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/tools-discuss>, <mailto:tools-discuss-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 16 Jun 2021 15:09:01 -0000

Hi,

On 2021-6-16, at 17:51, Toerless Eckert <tte@cs.fau.de> wrote:
> I would call this a datatracker bug. No XML, no TXT rendering provided for drafts.
> 
> How the heck am i going to do research work into the past,
> i often had to do rfcdiff against older drafts. That requires access
> to draft text versions, it will not work with just the html'ized versions.
> 
> Do i need to rsync the whole tools.id repo now to do this ?!
> 
> *sigh*

If you think this is a missing feature in the datatracker, please submit a ticket? https://trac.ietf.org/trac/ietfdb/newticket

Also, I'd like to ask you to adopt a more constructive attitude.

Thanks,
Lars