Re: [Tools-discuss] Expiry Doctrine (Re: Expired draft on the w.g. status pages [was Re: disappearing IDs on www.ietf.org])

Joseph Touch <touch@strayalpha.com> Wed, 23 September 2020 15:18 UTC

Return-Path: <touch@strayalpha.com>
X-Original-To: tools-discuss@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: tools-discuss@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id EAE363A1223 for <tools-discuss@ietfa.amsl.com>; Wed, 23 Sep 2020 08:18:26 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.318
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.318 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_EF=-0.1, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_NEUTRAL=0.779, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001] autolearn=no autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=strayalpha.com
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id Rlx234CGFz09 for <tools-discuss@ietfa.amsl.com>; Wed, 23 Sep 2020 08:18:25 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from server217-4.web-hosting.com (server217-4.web-hosting.com [198.54.116.98]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 9DB5B3A1220 for <tools-discuss@ietf.org>; Wed, 23 Sep 2020 08:18:25 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; q=dns/txt; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=strayalpha.com; s=default; h=To:References:Message-Id:Cc:Date:In-Reply-To: From:Subject:Mime-Version:Content-Type:Sender:Reply-To: Content-Transfer-Encoding:Content-ID:Content-Description:Resent-Date: Resent-From:Resent-Sender:Resent-To:Resent-Cc:Resent-Message-ID:List-Id: List-Help:List-Unsubscribe:List-Subscribe:List-Post:List-Owner:List-Archive; bh=omaU43QwYlniObt5LJyMvJ8rJaBRIr+zaqJ8cO4CHNI=; b=jEoBFPYojBBXofaBmg84cttuY SSzgyko+orG3ZqaPCCfK8BnlmTmYBj8rvNJziSzgHEkSvC5v4w6xLDowamHmeWjMGTq5+c2SzQNT9 d0byoxN2oVoUdDkhp15X7rme7K6SDFVZDujHzglC25l2NiIloovt31VbsHtGs0mP1gmEcu52DQxXG voRJnr+/earATfSjmccpvefTsEk8HS8dUcQkxMiJrHXTN9Of2rtaE9p3ZA0TAK2JQfX1x4puEushk LcXL6Osq646NQ8izyq72GPun72i8sqlFMGmOzq6YdvSGWxOBW8XRMfqxzPnX/HtYSt1rW8dFS35cR RYXanwTyQ==;
Received: from cpe-172-250-225-198.socal.res.rr.com ([172.250.225.198]:65165 helo=[192.168.1.14]) by server217.web-hosting.com with esmtpsa (TLS1.2) tls TLS_ECDHE_RSA_WITH_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (Exim 4.93) (envelope-from <touch@strayalpha.com>) id 1kL6XE-001MxL-KF; Wed, 23 Sep 2020 11:18:24 -0400
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="Apple-Mail=_B0EFC9C9-1884-4075-8EBF-DA897DBD5D96"
Mime-Version: 1.0 (Mac OS X Mail 13.4 \(3608.120.23.2.1\))
From: Joseph Touch <touch@strayalpha.com>
In-Reply-To: <49c00166-4dfe-b4fa-e654-44b89fbbb727@gmail.com>
Date: Wed, 23 Sep 2020 08:18:19 -0700
Cc: Carsten Bormann <cabo@tzi.org>, tools-discuss@ietf.org
Message-Id: <AB6F23B2-5136-486E-94FA-5DF79670988F@strayalpha.com>
References: <09b3413a-a91d-d1d9-5486-598a317000c2@gmail.com> <46DA8D26-3C10-4A89-84A8-3B412B745313@strayalpha.com> <49c00166-4dfe-b4fa-e654-44b89fbbb727@gmail.com>
To: Brian E Carpenter <brian.e.carpenter@gmail.com>
X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.3608.120.23.2.1)
X-OutGoing-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.0
X-AntiAbuse: This header was added to track abuse, please include it with any abuse report
X-AntiAbuse: Primary Hostname - server217.web-hosting.com
X-AntiAbuse: Original Domain - ietf.org
X-AntiAbuse: Originator/Caller UID/GID - [47 12] / [47 12]
X-AntiAbuse: Sender Address Domain - strayalpha.com
X-Get-Message-Sender-Via: server217.web-hosting.com: authenticated_id: touch@strayalpha.com
X-Authenticated-Sender: server217.web-hosting.com: touch@strayalpha.com
X-Source:
X-Source-Args:
X-Source-Dir:
X-From-Rewrite: unmodified, already matched
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/tools-discuss/ix4S8AIw0ISLxIWHUVVCsJU4QZU>
Subject: Re: [Tools-discuss] Expiry Doctrine (Re: Expired draft on the w.g. status pages [was Re: disappearing IDs on www.ietf.org])
X-BeenThere: tools-discuss@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: IETF Tools Discussion <tools-discuss.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/tools-discuss>, <mailto:tools-discuss-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/tools-discuss/>
List-Post: <mailto:tools-discuss@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:tools-discuss-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/tools-discuss>, <mailto:tools-discuss-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 23 Sep 2020 15:18:27 -0000


> On Sep 22, 2020, at 8:37 PM, Brian E Carpenter <brian.e.carpenter@gmail.com> wrote:
> 
> On 23-Sep-20 15:05, Joe Touch wrote:
>> 
>> 
>>> On Sep 22, 2020, at 8:00 PM, Brian E Carpenter <brian.e.carpenter@gmail.com <mailto:brian.e.carpenter@gmail.com>> wrote:
>>> 
>>> What we have learned over a number of years is that drafts have archival
>>> value and may be of interest years after they were written; and this can
>>> apply to all versions, not just the most recent version. That's
>>> inconsistent with the rules, so we should change the rules.
>> 
>> Or correct your misconception. 
>> 
>> Value to the community includes their expiry. 
> 
> Yes. That's a label, and I wouldn't suggest to change that label.

So what exactly are you suggesting to change?

If expiration is treated as “just a label", then it has no meaning.

Joe