[Tools-discuss] "approve a draft" functionality & WG advisors
"Eggert, Lars" <lars@netapp.com> Wed, 24 April 2013 00:40 UTC
Return-Path: <lars@netapp.com>
X-Original-To: tools-discuss@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: tools-discuss@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 649F221F937D for <tools-discuss@ietfa.amsl.com>; Tue, 23 Apr 2013 17:40:17 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -10.33
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-10.33 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[AWL=0.269, BAYES_00=-2.599, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_HI=-8]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([12.22.58.30]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 03PKOa7J9yHa for <tools-discuss@ietfa.amsl.com>; Tue, 23 Apr 2013 17:40:17 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mx12.netapp.com (mx12.netapp.com [216.240.18.77]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id EB8BD21F937B for <tools-discuss@ietf.org>; Tue, 23 Apr 2013 17:40:16 -0700 (PDT)
X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="4.87,538,1363158000"; d="scan'208";a="44154167"
Received: from smtp2.corp.netapp.com ([10.57.159.114]) by mx12-out.netapp.com with ESMTP; 23 Apr 2013 17:40:16 -0700
Received: from vmwexceht02-prd.hq.netapp.com (vmwexceht02-prd.hq.netapp.com [10.106.76.240]) by smtp2.corp.netapp.com (8.13.1/8.13.1/NTAP-1.6) with ESMTP id r3O0e9Xe002730 for <tools-discuss@ietf.org>; Tue, 23 Apr 2013 17:40:16 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from SACEXCMBX01-PRD.hq.netapp.com ([169.254.2.71]) by vmwexceht02-prd.hq.netapp.com ([10.106.76.240]) with mapi id 14.02.0342.003; Tue, 23 Apr 2013 17:40:09 -0700
From: "Eggert, Lars" <lars@netapp.com>
To: "tools-discuss@ietf.org Discussion" <tools-discuss@ietf.org>
Thread-Topic: "approve a draft" functionality & WG advisors
Thread-Index: AQHOQIRFMMTzeQ27BECvam5Uy4mpdA==
Date: Wed, 24 Apr 2013 00:40:08 +0000
Message-ID: <17224071-37D7-4D09-8B79-290F7935D9A9@netapp.com>
Accept-Language: en-US
Content-Language: en-US
X-MS-Has-Attach:
X-MS-TNEF-Correlator:
x-originating-ip: [10.104.60.116]
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
Content-ID: <941152C2AE54174BB9F60CE773CCECA0@tahoe.netapp.com>
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
MIME-Version: 1.0
Subject: [Tools-discuss] "approve a draft" functionality & WG advisors
X-BeenThere: tools-discuss@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.12
Precedence: list
List-Id: IETF Tools Discussion <tools-discuss.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/tools-discuss>, <mailto:tools-discuss-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/tools-discuss>
List-Post: <mailto:tools-discuss@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:tools-discuss-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/tools-discuss>, <mailto:tools-discuss-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 24 Apr 2013 00:40:17 -0000
Hi, since I'm just looking at the "approve a draft" tool, here's another issue: I'm technical advisor for the LWIG WG. I see that the tool actually lets me pre-approve LWIG WG documents. I don't think that's supposed to be something that WG advisors can do. I can see that it can be useful to allow this for WG secretaries, but not for tech advisors. Lars
- [Tools-discuss] "approve a draft" functionality &… Eggert, Lars
- Re: [Tools-discuss] "approve a draft" functionali… Carsten Bormann