Re: [Tools-discuss] [jose] [Editorial Errata Reported] RFC7515 (6118)

Julian Reschke <julian.reschke@gmx.de> Mon, 04 May 2020 15:30 UTC

Return-Path: <julian.reschke@gmx.de>
X-Original-To: tools-discuss@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: tools-discuss@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1D6B93A0ACE; Mon, 4 May 2020 08:30:58 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.896
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.896 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, FREEMAIL_FROM=0.001, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_H4=0.001, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_WL=0.001, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (1024-bit key) header.d=gmx.net
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id zllUNmr-Xjf0; Mon, 4 May 2020 08:30:56 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mout.gmx.net (mout.gmx.net [212.227.15.19]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 1B36D3A0AAD; Mon, 4 May 2020 08:30:55 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=gmx.net; s=badeba3b8450; t=1588606234; bh=5QmdiT/rDD3FXw15xggXgfL/FxLxXnWaGCdJB5zGXvU=; h=X-UI-Sender-Class:Subject:To:Cc:References:From:Date:In-Reply-To; b=bAKBlTjUFu+It/QJ0+U7Um/qbIlYWyTJYykn3jnFHxOzcKvDwusnchzy8hRlw1MMu SFCCxs34B+ERSavbtB9QesaLzWorVo7K0e766AG1tt3SDIG2Ztlq4LZ9P1dhwPCcV8 9iNELmA91PC3PJB30jRWbPuHT3YZ38elIsSMY8Ck=
X-UI-Sender-Class: 01bb95c1-4bf8-414a-932a-4f6e2808ef9c
Received: from [192.168.1.220] ([217.91.35.233]) by mail.gmx.com (mrgmx004 [212.227.17.190]) with ESMTPSA (Nemesis) id 1M3UUy-1jWBHX42TK-000YdJ; Mon, 04 May 2020 17:30:34 +0200
To: Robert Sparks <rjsparks@nostrum.com>, Carsten Bormann <cabo@tzi.org>, John Bradley <ve7jtb@ve7jtb.com>
Cc: Tools Team Discussion <tools-discuss@ietf.org>, jose@ietf.org, RFC Errata System <rfc-editor@rfc-editor.org>
References: <20200422200954.2B867F40729@rfc-editor.org> <00e601d618e3$dfd06e30$9f714a90$@augustcellars.com> <CAANoGhLDiq1jcTBQo1PDpXu-3MeD0U5Qx0sNhB2ZdmpRcW-G+g@mail.gmail.com> <FD2113D1-F25A-4D00-A8F5-18757852703A@tzi.org> <b2cb80a5-aa20-491b-791a-1b368c54525f@ve7jtb.com> <EF1F3CC8-9D69-4892-A05B-A3E48A9EEBE7@tzi.org> <2638adfe-23ee-be15-d952-5a16d56243ab@nostrum.com>
From: Julian Reschke <julian.reschke@gmx.de>
Message-ID: <7b66f07c-6920-f790-822f-06c99ef376f0@gmx.de>
Date: Mon, 4 May 2020 17:30:32 +0200
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 10.0; WOW64; rv:68.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/68.7.0
MIME-Version: 1.0
In-Reply-To: <2638adfe-23ee-be15-d952-5a16d56243ab@nostrum.com>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8; format=flowed
Content-Language: en-US
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
X-Provags-ID: V03:K1:YtkM6uR+16xF/JXid/GJ8m+b5G6aOaArz33BZHWvTuc7qTBNNcB UqtmDaBicPXGW3cWqlgJGUOjbERN77Zgden5JYrKUpT3KFu4LsgfdG4rRi/Hg1SVz9UIxUF 0dT81xaBQXs/+TPEOfeoeBQlDejV/B2470yfoYGQmesT4Mc3E2CLRtrsOimtP5LgwqISC/s vSggzr18PzQnnB+PHLXKg==
X-UI-Out-Filterresults: notjunk:1;V03:K0:djb0kLuRHMg=:+AWOsg6LsvrJEctizy0u17 3gz7gey3GvEIe8FAxzVyK6ASetH8gBfYrM92jvLL41uF0A6fANMONYgPw2WVFXCeprSAn/PEf FoTD9qwgjlNUOugS1ImxWjOKdllVMXIf+BjlS4i3dAH6QPfrCqP201tFGNV1iyh8+Xinyaat9 f0MyBkvZ9A+UGPa7xoUqjDD9Bz1W1SyVQxe52qjaCz8mH87nl5QqIk/E9Y8UZEgz6eO0TJ+qi sItSKp+e6KIqroTYMP5fZG9gVEkRgLd94AbXY76TKz1VXB9BjfWA+XRITRhZfAPeYL0edgS6Y 7zRK+OmTClCunvusNEjn2nTSWiEUk/XbMlvOuJZ9tIRITAd0JQRmUdOEZqCSt355am2lKjf9+ bhYdZ5WcXdiWFQ0rjUmjoIs9etHFV5/BetXkMI5nS7EL52RudCGVEdaae7MfQsmyunF16PCZo nkQeA9xXwoaLXVvVlB8+BNe+hxRDabfkrR2P2RauVEoSBFNslqw/VW3mII25jNxLGspv+06Wl CkFVvgtTy+GlTvU2HLNQTG36q7BnLBQu2YQHZA+8/XO1aqC/f2ivDGfZE5v4+2+12CfW/mu5u R6OfqOm002ETN2WCpinUAtvwW382M856/1lWD5u1corWHk8LlqwRxWcS5G2NV98CC9S7wyyJb 36ZCdoYFB9QjNoR39TKLAEbL9LWnvpE8e8sp5owg4yvxvG3uI/K21w6+TKt1N7yVBrznhxjhn mET/Syi0HrkSRBJ5grEHRB5OEv0vdNBzhStA7XEtq5UAMsF5t/MA2ir6DxrXfk0WiqURU9L1Y 9fvY5xYCNTCtSpA3SJvZFs/K1LqSP3wsO8E7sALKOOAzMMn1jNhurfa1ImutaoZyogbV57bZ+ Vz8cq1LGnrP/CfQ1ThN6svuzqlvhL4Wwj8Szms0KHMkJS2lDo1zm5n/ioraSuHI9Cq4ImKcur Dwkohnbv+m6u5Dnb1fxwxTpQnKIgwzAi6S7kFNchokCqE/Mh9PcY0LUP2v7LNQIBcSjnqZRFm BKbJ0lpveSozHuO9FdLu36wwPNCbtpVf96VhM7YcmqXxVfUc0h8F3hsAF6d08HEvPCqT1VMnQ zYcNHiY1lMiZm4KKNKbM+qa1dD2fECyKCmcyQCXTYdSLdXNRyNqe8Tob84VIzLv9RyatN/+Bj aB9OrXa2Jj/M1vTZaq3IvoMRB54LrV+/uYTHmA6g1zzIyTUUM+nf8guzDbFDNu9SnkJFVNQh7 WksPIEXiWiykWhHvd
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/tools-discuss/jQvuujEPgclM3KY4_3aDknmbu5o>
Subject: Re: [Tools-discuss] [jose] [Editorial Errata Reported] RFC7515 (6118)
X-BeenThere: tools-discuss@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: IETF Tools Discussion <tools-discuss.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/tools-discuss>, <mailto:tools-discuss-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/tools-discuss/>
List-Post: <mailto:tools-discuss@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:tools-discuss-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/tools-discuss>, <mailto:tools-discuss-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 04 May 2020 15:30:58 -0000

On 04.05.2020 17:19, Robert Sparks wrote:
> Hi Carsten -
>
> How is the SMOP you are envisioning different from the inline-errata
> tooling?
>
> See https://www.rfc-editor.org/rfc/inline-errata/rfc6016.html or
> https://www.rfc-editor.org/rfc/inline-errata/rfc8400.html for small
> examples.
> ...

The inline errata tooling can only help if something is an actual
erratum (some kind of a bug in the published RFC).

The thing discussed above refers to a bug introduced by the "rfcmarkup"
tool, which transforms the plain text version into HTML, and
occasionally messes up section links.

FWIW, I agree with Carsten that some kind of exception list would help
in that at least we wouldn't get the same errata reports all over again.

Best regards, Julian