[Tools-discuss] Testing Meetecho - especially slide presentation
bradpetersau <bradpetersau@protonmail.com> Tue, 04 June 2024 23:15 UTC
Return-Path: <bradpetersau@protonmail.com>
X-Original-To: tools-discuss@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: tools-discuss@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 87147C1E0D95 for <tools-discuss@ietfa.amsl.com>; Tue, 4 Jun 2024 16:15:42 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2.093
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.093 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_EF=-0.1, FREEMAIL_FROM=0.001, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_H4=0.001, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_WL=0.001, RCVD_IN_ZEN_BLOCKED_OPENDNS=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001, URIBL_DBL_BLOCKED_OPENDNS=0.001, URIBL_ZEN_BLOCKED_OPENDNS=0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=protonmail.com
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([50.223.129.194]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id zw746oC58dza for <tools-discuss@ietfa.amsl.com>; Tue, 4 Jun 2024 16:15:38 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mail-43166.protonmail.ch (mail-43166.protonmail.ch [185.70.43.166]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits) key-exchange X25519 server-signature RSA-PSS (2048 bits) server-digest SHA256) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 72B0AC1CAF50 for <tools-discuss@ietf.org>; Tue, 4 Jun 2024 16:15:38 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=protonmail.com; s=protonmail3; t=1717542936; x=1717802136; bh=ItBrtQnV1yYNc6nvuEUQGb1VENG6M79JAGchkZqgyQw=; h=Date:To:From:Subject:Message-ID:Feedback-ID:From:To:Cc:Date: Subject:Reply-To:Feedback-ID:Message-ID:BIMI-Selector; b=WlekP+lMFw3EgbILQZmOPrNoAtH7GNwNEEgrWtVaHDRhcLDf8IE3CwGWAjODo10hp hyT5ueQUpZ5DGfvcjI+Irw9V3IPCLYmRuXHSqbKnP8LsVP72fC6remj72iu4WMLMlD dGmmPCppJ0qp/a9mV4RVd3V4opzy4pYf46q39k+TSwv9rB2u7E3FCo/6/KGCUGlFQw od8R8IkF9tjc/rmqQrN/du/Jm6T+iSTHpDP3Cy61HTeNsZaioSV3Iq5XXEvlY9xrA2 oSQYswTVPuxR9f6oRQMAYoPgfsuKHBxNvUodvi99n+AfDZtKg+yTm6jlVsgaN7s1Zf Ipw8yeQAYnCog==
Date: Tue, 04 Jun 2024 23:15:32 +0000
To: "tools-discuss@ietf.org" <tools-discuss@ietf.org>
From: bradpetersau <bradpetersau@protonmail.com>
Message-ID: <B83lfDCZtJNU377erp0wzC-ytf_odrgq76gcviyjV9H8xbnrj2WnIc6Q90R-gz6PhK1sOQWmp3aOXRk5orDOrblQCIeGMHTEukwuGXbUwr4=@protonmail.com>
Feedback-ID: 35834704:user:proton
X-Pm-Message-ID: 7f093a7c517d0a1df6c22de8cfff5ae78ba20ed2
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="b1_xYE8vcc3Yh9OXm9B2TnqpofRKaflIF0UxsVG0FJG0"
Message-ID-Hash: 5EXBCDQGNJ6XMNNTCQNCAOXT3IL26G3S
X-Message-ID-Hash: 5EXBCDQGNJ6XMNNTCQNCAOXT3IL26G3S
X-MailFrom: bradpetersau@protonmail.com
X-Mailman-Rule-Misses: dmarc-mitigation; no-senders; approved; emergency; loop; banned-address; member-moderation; header-match-tools-discuss.ietf.org-0; nonmember-moderation; administrivia; implicit-dest; max-recipients; max-size; news-moderation; no-subject; digests; suspicious-header
X-Mailman-Version: 3.3.9rc4
Precedence: list
Subject: [Tools-discuss] Testing Meetecho - especially slide presentation
List-Id: IETF Tools Discussion <tools-discuss.ietf.org>
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/tools-discuss/jnYW3GQ-Z72NMH3ivbUryMtokwc>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/tools-discuss>
List-Help: <mailto:tools-discuss-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Owner: <mailto:tools-discuss-owner@ietf.org>
List-Post: <mailto:tools-discuss@ietf.org>
List-Subscribe: <mailto:tools-discuss-join@ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <mailto:tools-discuss-leave@ietf.org>
I joined a meeting remotely last night and although the video and audio was fine the slides being shared only displayed a picture that they were about to be shared. I tried multiple different browsers in normal and private mode, multiple different Operating Systems and multiple different networks and had the same response on all. I have previously used meetecho with no problems so this was a surprise. Is there a end user test capability for testing meetecho? Cheers Brad
- [Tools-discuss] Testing Meetecho - especially sli… bradpetersau