[Tools-discuss] ietf gitlab

Michael Richardson <mcr+ietf@sandelman.ca> Sun, 01 August 2021 20:13 UTC

Return-Path: <mcr+ietf@sandelman.ca>
X-Original-To: tools-discuss@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: tools-discuss@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 79F7B3A0CDC for <tools-discuss@ietfa.amsl.com>; Sun, 1 Aug 2021 13:13:31 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.899
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.899 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id bk75pt1gq269 for <tools-discuss@ietfa.amsl.com>; Sun, 1 Aug 2021 13:13:27 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from tuna.sandelman.ca (tuna.sandelman.ca [IPv6:2607:f0b0:f:3:216:3eff:fe7c:d1f3]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ADH-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 68EE53A0CD2 for <tools-discuss@ietf.org>; Sun, 1 Aug 2021 13:13:27 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by tuna.sandelman.ca (Postfix) with ESMTP id B99CB389B4 for <tools-discuss@ietf.org>; Sun, 1 Aug 2021 16:17:30 -0400 (EDT)
Received: from tuna.sandelman.ca ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with LMTP id 3nS9UI-8PTvH for <tools-discuss@ietf.org>; Sun, 1 Aug 2021 16:17:27 -0400 (EDT)
Received: from sandelman.ca (obiwan.sandelman.ca [IPv6:2607:f0b0:f:2::247]) by tuna.sandelman.ca (Postfix) with ESMTP id C6919389B3 for <tools-discuss@ietf.org>; Sun, 1 Aug 2021 16:17:27 -0400 (EDT)
Received: from localhost (localhost [IPv6:::1]) by sandelman.ca (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7E026B24 for <tools-discuss@ietf.org>; Sun, 1 Aug 2021 16:13:22 -0400 (EDT)
From: Michael Richardson <mcr+ietf@sandelman.ca>
To: tools-discuss@ietf.org
X-Attribution: mcr
X-Mailer: MH-E 8.6+git; nmh 1.7+dev; GNU Emacs 26.1
X-Face: $\n1pF)h^`}$H>Hk{L"x@)JS7<%Az}5RyS@k9X%29-lHB$Ti.V>2bi.~ehC0; <'$9xN5Ub# z!G,p`nR&p7Fz@^UXIn156S8.~^@MJ*mMsD7=QFeq%AL4m<nPbLgmtKK-5dC@#:k
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: multipart/signed; boundary="=-=-="; micalg=pgp-sha512; protocol="application/pgp-signature"
Date: Sun, 01 Aug 2021 16:13:22 -0400
Message-ID: <20847.1627848802@localhost>
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/tools-discuss/kRStdTBMHNxW02COB6ahKU95NIg>
Subject: [Tools-discuss] ietf gitlab
X-BeenThere: tools-discuss@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: IETF Tools Discussion <tools-discuss.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/tools-discuss>, <mailto:tools-discuss-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/tools-discuss/>
List-Post: <mailto:tools-discuss@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:tools-discuss-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/tools-discuss>, <mailto:tools-discuss-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 01 Aug 2021 20:13:32 -0000

I read in some thread that the IETF apparently owns a Gitlab license.
(I guess a supported version, as I thought the code was open source)

While there are many social reasons that WGs may want to use github, some WGs
and/or some authors might prefer gitlab.
There are a bunch of things which I think we should do with gitlab:
1)  WG charters. I just read read a rechartering, and I don't have the
    history to easily know what's going on. A rechartering branch would
    solve that.

2) the backups that the secretariat keeps from github could be visible there.
   Because... untested processes often have unseen failures.
   While this likely wouldn't deal with issues/pull requests, it would
   allow the core git content to be visible over IPv6.

3) I know that RFC-editor has experimented with git.
   While there might be jurisdictional issues with AUTH48 editing occuring in
   the IETF's gitlab, git lets you deal across repositories easily, so maybe
   this is less of an issue if managed well.

Just some thoughts.

--
Michael Richardson <mcr+IETF@sandelman.ca>   . o O ( IPv6 IøT consulting )
           Sandelman Software Works Inc, Ottawa and Worldwide