Re: [Tools-discuss] Early preview of upcoming changes to the agenda pages

Robert Sparks <rjsparks@nostrum.com> Mon, 20 June 2022 22:02 UTC

Return-Path: <rjsparks@nostrum.com>
X-Original-To: tools-discuss@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: tools-discuss@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 98A91C14792E; Mon, 20 Jun 2022 15:02:02 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -3.961
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-3.961 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_EF=-0.1, NICE_REPLY_A=-1.876, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_BLOCKED=0.001, RCVD_IN_ZEN_BLOCKED_OPENDNS=0.001, T_SCC_BODY_TEXT_LINE=-0.01, T_SPF_HELO_PERMERROR=0.01, T_SPF_PERMERROR=0.01, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001, URIBL_DBL_BLOCKED_OPENDNS=0.001, URIBL_ZEN_BLOCKED_OPENDNS=0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (1024-bit key) header.d=nostrum.com
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([50.223.129.194]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id ezqj8ARz9b2B; Mon, 20 Jun 2022 15:01:58 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from nostrum.com (raven-v6.nostrum.com [IPv6:2001:470:d:1130::1]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits) key-exchange X25519 server-signature RSA-PSS (2048 bits) server-digest SHA256) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id BC6B3C14F737; Mon, 20 Jun 2022 15:01:58 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from [192.168.1.114] ([47.186.48.51]) (authenticated bits=0) by nostrum.com (8.17.1/8.17.1) with ESMTPSA id 25KM1u7I071806 (version=TLSv1.3 cipher=TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 bits=256 verify=NO); Mon, 20 Jun 2022 17:01:56 -0500 (CDT) (envelope-from rjsparks@nostrum.com)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=simple/simple; d=nostrum.com; s=default; t=1655762517; bh=PfmP/pidVrgug7I+9DyKyATD9iuC635/eMou0fli15Y=; h=Date:Subject:To:Cc:References:From:In-Reply-To; b=vW7xCPJ96oSCq2C/Ryynom06N7hTZQo6cSNhJK0VTT+0jzcx5tN8DRCbc62xwXSz/ EDj4K2dv25fPHJWDh/6Qfy4kID3O8KJ3jQrCKFIfsM1SB2PB22Tngwi9rWvdHlYotU SbvYPopjPN3REEv4On79wPTkCtvP40aRPsO09RGg=
X-Authentication-Warning: raven.nostrum.com: Host [47.186.48.51] claimed to be [192.168.1.114]
Message-ID: <4b1ff577-318a-26dd-2987-77de9e264368@nostrum.com>
Date: Mon, 20 Jun 2022 17:01:50 -0500
MIME-Version: 1.0
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Macintosh; Intel Mac OS X 10.15; rv:91.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/91.10.0
Content-Language: en-US
To: Jay Daley <exec-director@ietf.org>
Cc: tools-discuss <tools-discuss@ietf.org>, Nick <nick@staff.ietf.org>
References: <3ee5bed3-7689-6c45-133e-f2ed0e6fa57e@nostrum.com> <F097E3D2-AC24-4294-8839-18B48EBF62BD@ietf.org>
From: Robert Sparks <rjsparks@nostrum.com>
In-Reply-To: <F097E3D2-AC24-4294-8839-18B48EBF62BD@ietf.org>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"; format="flowed"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/tools-discuss/lvccKsW-Mn_vSw3saKtqZrhJf5M>
Subject: Re: [Tools-discuss] Early preview of upcoming changes to the agenda pages
X-BeenThere: tools-discuss@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.39
Precedence: list
List-Id: IETF Tools Discussion <tools-discuss.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/tools-discuss>, <mailto:tools-discuss-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/tools-discuss/>
List-Post: <mailto:tools-discuss@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:tools-discuss-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/tools-discuss>, <mailto:tools-discuss-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 20 Jun 2022 22:02:02 -0000

Cherry-picking one item based on a conversation with Nick

On 6/16/22 7:51 AM, Jay Daley wrote:
> 7.  It would be useful for the agenda infonote (<div class="agenda-infonote …">) could be dismissable with a cross in the top right hand corner and then redisplayed by clicking on an "i" (info) button next to "Schedule".

The secretariat changes the note during the meeting sometimes to convey 
important emerging information. Nick interpreted this to mean that the 
close would persist across loading the page again, which I think is 
reasonable, but if the content of the note changes, it should open again.

RjS