IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [Tools-discuss] Datatracker login for errata

Carsten Bormann <cabo@tzi.org> Tue, 30 May 2023 15:04 UTC

Return-Path: <cabo@tzi.org>
X-Original-To: tools-discuss@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: tools-discuss@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0A326C15DD6A for <tools-discuss@ietfa.amsl.com>; Tue, 30 May 2023 08:04:26 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -4.199
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-4.199 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_MED=-2.3, RCVD_IN_ZEN_BLOCKED_OPENDNS=0.001, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([50.223.129.194]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 5GLgmGV6w6HF for <tools-discuss@ietfa.amsl.com>; Tue, 30 May 2023 08:04:23 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from smtp.zfn.uni-bremen.de (smtp.zfn.uni-bremen.de [134.102.50.21]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits) key-exchange X25519 server-signature RSA-PSS (2048 bits) server-digest SHA256) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 5A69EC15E406 for <tools-discuss@ietf.org>; Tue, 30 May 2023 08:04:21 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from [192.168.217.124] (p548dc0f6.dip0.t-ipconnect.de [84.141.192.246]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by smtp.zfn.uni-bremen.de (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 4QVwfB5zK2zDCd4; Tue, 30 May 2023 17:04:18 +0200 (CEST)
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8"
Mime-Version: 1.0 (Mac OS X Mail 13.4 \(3608.120.23.2.7\))
From: Carsten Bormann <cabo@tzi.org>
In-Reply-To: <e3248c00-ec2b-b6b3-cb3e-46261217bc30@amsl.com>
Date: Tue, 30 May 2023 17:04:18 +0200
X-Mao-Original-Outgoing-Id: 707151858.479365-0cd6eed898594cf7863658ab6672581a
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Message-Id: <9B0E1053-7DC6-4B93-BCB5-E63B67B3BB17@tzi.org>
References: <CABcZeBOkf9Z_bAMcUroHd44DOmBa60=qq0u4V8EJPDU2tUoi4A@mail.gmail.com> <20230528172358.B9953DF9249C@ary.qy> <CABcZeBP9A7rYCZsJC9gVrxzMKLpiSBqJUjCX9VN7_mf0fDtv1w@mail.gmail.com> <125bbed2-7f3e-71c1-e26c-7e5f8c55bd2f@gmail.com> <D4C6C897EA2F505AC1DC2018@PSB> <e3248c00-ec2b-b6b3-cb3e-46261217bc30@amsl.com>
To: tools-discuss <tools-discuss@ietf.org>
X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.3608.120.23.2.7)
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/tools-discuss/mBlsucRjyKZBD27Oh3ruTn76Xvw>
Subject: Re: [Tools-discuss] Datatracker login for errata
X-BeenThere: tools-discuss@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.39
Precedence: list
List-Id: IETF Tools Discussion <tools-discuss.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/tools-discuss>, <mailto:tools-discuss-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/tools-discuss/>
List-Post: <mailto:tools-discuss@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:tools-discuss-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/tools-discuss>, <mailto:tools-discuss-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 30 May 2023 15:04:26 -0000

On 2023-05-30, at 16:55, Jean Mahoney <jmahoney@amsl.com> wrote:
> 
> [JM] Of the non-spam errata reports that were processed in 2022 (179 reports, including both technical and editorial), 80% were Verified, 7% were Held for Document Update, and 12% were Rejected. See [1] for definitions.

Wow.

So the discussion of the spam repellant should be very separate from the normal path for submission, which seems to be useful enough to stop further discouraging its use.

(That statistic is biased towards errata reports that *were* processed, but that is a different subject.)

Now I probably should write code that checks how many of the reporters of the 179 reports already have a datatracker account, but I’ll refrain for now.

Grüße, Carsten

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email