Re: [Tools-discuss] another case of links not updating

Robert Sparks <rjsparks@nostrum.com> Wed, 06 May 2020 14:56 UTC

Return-Path: <rjsparks@nostrum.com>
X-Original-To: tools-discuss@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: tools-discuss@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id B47FE3A0A90 for <tools-discuss@ietfa.amsl.com>; Wed, 6 May 2020 07:56:19 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2.079
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.079 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_EF=-0.1, T_SPF_HELO_PERMERROR=0.01, T_SPF_PERMERROR=0.01, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (1024-bit key) header.d=nostrum.com
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id facFH9tzO1VE for <tools-discuss@ietfa.amsl.com>; Wed, 6 May 2020 07:56:16 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from nostrum.com (raven-v6.nostrum.com [IPv6:2001:470:d:1130::1]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 10AB53A0A0A for <tools-discuss@ietf.org>; Wed, 6 May 2020 07:56:16 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from unescapeable.local ([47.186.30.41]) (authenticated bits=0) by nostrum.com (8.15.2/8.15.2) with ESMTPSA id 046EuEJO058368 (version=TLSv1.3 cipher=TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 bits=256 verify=NO) for <tools-discuss@ietf.org>; Wed, 6 May 2020 09:56:15 -0500 (CDT) (envelope-from rjsparks@nostrum.com)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=simple/simple; d=nostrum.com; s=default; t=1588776975; bh=am6QOtit9hOr7OQUkhFidDjU+wG9aX1FQsQ+vqx63os=; h=Subject:To:References:From:Date:In-Reply-To; b=kPQLRIz6CcKxYI15FhZR6BgDJgGeZJCtMvj3p1abYteXW0KEX3zriWLysP+Njd6j2 2n+XgW9c6+U/orJbsK1oh3V9ifGnkDO1D2c/kEOLx2ccwH2EeLGLGLgINpVWcmugqP oFk24XwmLaomro6u2aLvS1rzicqinUkc7RrgKnoQ=
X-Authentication-Warning: raven.nostrum.com: Host [47.186.30.41] claimed to be unescapeable.local
To: tools-discuss@ietf.org
References: <alpine.LRH.2.21.2005061024040.16512@bofh.nohats.ca>
From: Robert Sparks <rjsparks@nostrum.com>
Message-ID: <322d11c6-304f-7ee4-d9a5-20b026106787@nostrum.com>
Date: Wed, 6 May 2020 09:56:14 -0500
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Macintosh; Intel Mac OS X 10.14; rv:68.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/68.7.0
MIME-Version: 1.0
In-Reply-To: <alpine.LRH.2.21.2005061024040.16512@bofh.nohats.ca>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8; format=flowed
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Content-Language: en-US
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/tools-discuss/mSYYr5hVBqR8w6NqVxcxFWYT5LU>
Subject: Re: [Tools-discuss] another case of links not updating
X-BeenThere: tools-discuss@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: IETF Tools Discussion <tools-discuss.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/tools-discuss>, <mailto:tools-discuss-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/tools-discuss/>
List-Post: <mailto:tools-discuss@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:tools-discuss-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/tools-discuss>, <mailto:tools-discuss-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 06 May 2020 14:56:21 -0000

Paul -

To be very clear, the tools team does not operate tools.ietf.org. That 
is a contribution from Henrik alone.

The tools team has been working on integrating the best of what's at 
tools.ietf.org into tools that we collaboratively maintain, such as the 
datatracker. The datatracker has an html-ized version of the draft you 
mention at https://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-pwouters-powerbind-04.

RjS

On 5/6/20 9:27 AM, Paul Wouters wrote:
>
> I see another case of links in older drafts not updating that there is a
> newer draft.
>
> See https://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-pwouters-powerbind-03
>
> There is a -04 version but it is not indicating this.
>
> The -04 is also not listed in the 00 to 03 version.
>
> It's not a "timing" thing either as the -04 was submitted on April 30.
>
>
> This issue has been present for years and I reported back on this many
> times. Perhaps the tools team can share where this code lives, so that
> others including me can have a look at it.
>
> Paul
>
> ___________________________________________________________
> Tools-discuss mailing list
> Tools-discuss@ietf.org
> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/tools-discuss
>
> Please report datatracker.ietf.org and mailarchive.ietf.org
> bugs at http://tools.ietf.org/tools/ietfdb
> or send email to datatracker-project@ietf.org
>
> Please report tools.ietf.org bugs at
> http://tools.ietf.org/tools/issues
> or send email to webmaster@tools.ietf.org