Re: [Tools-discuss] structured contributor section --- auto-reference to DT/Person?

On Thu, Oct 29, 2020 at 07:25:33PM +0100, Julian Reschke wrote:
> Am 29.10.2020 um 19:06 schrieb Toerless Eckert:
> > ...
> > the v3 xml, at least the normalized version spit out by the conversion is now
> > even less human producable, so i will certainly be attempting to do kramdown
> > or the like on my next work. Too bad it can't be directly uploaded to
> > datatracker.
> > ...
> 
> v3 xml in general is *easier* to author than v2 xml. Depending on the
> size of your source, it might easier to do the conversion "by hand". (In
> general, the only thing that *requires* changes are the <list> elements).

Hmm. Maybe i may be a victim of the conversion script on the IETF web age which seem
so have converted a lot of stuff into longer variants. But  thin that
you now always need two lines to a title (separate <name> tag if i am not mistaken).

The worst part was that i couldn't find a replacement for the perfectly simple
form of references in v2:

 <?rfc include='reference.RFC.4941'?>

I ended up having to figure out the crappy &rfc4941 methods, which wasn't documented
for v3 on the xml2rfc pages.

Why does the 'include' method not work anymore ?

Cheers
    Toerless

> 
> > ...
> 
> Best regards, Julian
> 
> ___________________________________________________________
> Tools-discuss mailing list
> Tools-discuss@ietf.org
> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/tools-discuss
> 
> Please report datatracker.ietf.org and mailarchive.ietf.org
> bugs at http://tools.ietf.org/tools/ietfdb
> or send email to datatracker-project@ietf.org
> 
> Please report tools.ietf.org bugs at
> http://tools.ietf.org/tools/issues
> or send email to webmaster@tools.ietf.org

-- 
---
tte@cs.fau.de