IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [Tools-discuss] Early preview of upcoming changes to the agenda pages

Paul Hoffman <paul.hoffman@vpnc.org> Wed, 15 June 2022 22:24 UTC

Return-Path: <paul.hoffman@vpnc.org>
X-Original-To: tools-discuss@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: tools-discuss@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0F140C14CF10 for <tools-discuss@ietfa.amsl.com>; Wed, 15 Jun 2022 15:24:17 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.907
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.907 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_BLOCKED=0.001, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_NONE=0.001, T_SCC_BODY_TEXT_LINE=-0.01] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([50.223.129.194]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id zQRqYW8mfBgg for <tools-discuss@ietfa.amsl.com>; Wed, 15 Jun 2022 15:24:15 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mail.proper.com (Opus1.Proper.COM [207.182.41.91]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id AABD0C14F72C for <tools-discuss@ietf.org>; Wed, 15 Jun 2022 15:24:15 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from [10.32.60.187] (76-209-242-70.lightspeed.mtryca.sbcglobal.net [76.209.242.70]) (authenticated bits=0) by mail.proper.com (8.15.2/8.15.2) with ESMTPSA id 25FMMXRB034463 (version=TLSv1.2 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 bits=256 verify=NO) for <tools-discuss@ietf.org>; Wed, 15 Jun 2022 15:22:34 -0700 (MST) (envelope-from paul.hoffman@vpnc.org)
X-Authentication-Warning: mail.proper.com: Host 76-209-242-70.lightspeed.mtryca.sbcglobal.net [76.209.242.70] claimed to be [10.32.60.187]
From: Paul Hoffman <paul.hoffman@vpnc.org>
To: tools-discuss <tools-discuss@ietf.org>
Date: Wed, 15 Jun 2022 15:24:14 -0700
X-Mailer: MailMate (1.14r5798)
Message-ID: <BD8E9D0C-B55A-4A3A-84EB-C92FA034DFA4@vpnc.org>
In-Reply-To: <3ee5bed3-7689-6c45-133e-f2ed0e6fa57e@nostrum.com>
References: <3ee5bed3-7689-6c45-133e-f2ed0e6fa57e@nostrum.com>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; format="flowed"
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/tools-discuss/mec4KHLepu7MKUWwInmW6-fHmKE>
Subject: Re: [Tools-discuss] Early preview of upcoming changes to the agenda pages
X-BeenThere: tools-discuss@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.39
Precedence: list
List-Id: IETF Tools Discussion <tools-discuss.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/tools-discuss>, <mailto:tools-discuss-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/tools-discuss/>
List-Post: <mailto:tools-discuss@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:tools-discuss-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/tools-discuss>, <mailto:tools-discuss-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 15 Jun 2022 22:24:17 -0000

(Sorry, I sent that last one too quickly.)

Personally, I think the lozenges for the area abbreviations are jarring. 
I care about WGs, not the area they are in. I'd be happier if they were 
both plain text with the WG abbreviations more obvious (in bold, maybe).

--Paul Hoffman

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email