[Tools-discuss] polls "show of hands": can we include a "i don't understand" or "not enough information" option
Daniel Kahn Gillmor <dkg@fifthhorseman.net> Wed, 18 November 2020 19:05 UTC
Return-Path: <dkg@fifthhorseman.net>
X-Original-To: tools-discuss@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: tools-discuss@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 988413A09D1 for <tools-discuss@ietfa.amsl.com>; Wed, 18 Nov 2020 11:05:26 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.306
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.306 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_EF=-0.1, RDNS_NONE=0.793, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001] autolearn=no autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=neutral reason="invalid (unsupported algorithm ed25519-sha256)" header.d=fifthhorseman.net header.b=ZUOpqhzu; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=fifthhorseman.net header.b=d5ECaIO1
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id nmnIRu_-NDRz for <tools-discuss@ietfa.amsl.com>; Wed, 18 Nov 2020 11:05:24 -0800 (PST)
Received: from che.mayfirst.org (unknown [162.247.75.117]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ADH-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id C90683A09CF for <tools-discuss@ietf.org>; Wed, 18 Nov 2020 11:05:24 -0800 (PST)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=ed25519-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=fifthhorseman.net; i=@fifthhorseman.net; q=dns/txt; s=2019; t=1605726321; h=from : to : subject : date : message-id : mime-version : content-type : from; bh=0vewniAG0AtGFk8KAwmxjsQP09VR4pNbFmoZegrfhRo=; b=ZUOpqhzuJnUB+A4tkVtu2wXl5nRCm0M1n1SQChORWnHR4ssPbfIFTde2IzTXPMCCAuA5w d5J4YpEXvyDnlZuCg==
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=fifthhorseman.net; i=@fifthhorseman.net; q=dns/txt; s=2019rsa; t=1605726321; h=from : to : subject : date : message-id : mime-version : content-type : from; bh=0vewniAG0AtGFk8KAwmxjsQP09VR4pNbFmoZegrfhRo=; b=d5ECaIO1EC19iJty2LfjvPQzu/IqCFupAc8Asb9zq83z59UmJi6T56PN7S27S1XwpOxQ1 Bow2wwT1f+4z1ARx2xiEp8P/RAwmFTPVPPpGY4ztt2wK4HIlttG9CZlGGsvr/DOIyS7FDZC MnVsLWdUkQHYjI/rXhao7X3jtm9l9QnjNDywGU1Blfhbxio+lFdAPr9n30AwF1tCxL+2CHg P5bioKDccZk8pB+xUXz9co9MjPEmH60M15YLQlhKcFNQUTzhYr3iu9hBH7+6slt0VSPiU0e 915tLxDPFGbT3n4eF2CXoehu+wbrro0s+ynqyqWMI3uNUie0RBxnFjIRn7dg==
Received: from fifthhorseman.net (unknown [IPv6:2001:470:1f07:60d:f2de:f1ff:fec3:d109]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits) key-exchange X25519 server-signature RSA-PSS (4096 bits) server-digest SHA256) (No client certificate requested) by che.mayfirst.org (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id C58EBF9A6 for <tools-discuss@ietf.org>; Wed, 18 Nov 2020 14:05:20 -0500 (EST)
Received: by fifthhorseman.net (Postfix, from userid 1000) id 615D520374; Wed, 18 Nov 2020 13:15:17 -0500 (EST)
From: Daniel Kahn Gillmor <dkg@fifthhorseman.net>
To: tools-discuss@ietf.org
Autocrypt: addr=dkg@fifthhorseman.net; prefer-encrypt=mutual; keydata= mDMEXEK/AhYJKwYBBAHaRw8BAQdAr/gSROcn+6m8ijTN0DV9AahoHGafy52RRkhCZVwxhEe0K0Rh bmllbCBLYWhuIEdpbGxtb3IgPGRrZ0BmaWZ0aGhvcnNlbWFuLm5ldD6ImQQTFggAQQIbAQULCQgH AgYVCgkICwIEFgIDAQIeAQIXgAIZARYhBMS8Lds4zOlkhevpwvIGkReQOOXGBQJd5Hw3BQkFpJWB AAoJEPIGkReQOOXGDYEA/j0ERjPxDleKMZ2LDcWc/3o5cLFwAVzBKQHppu0Be5IWAP0aeTnyEqlp RTE7M8zugwkhYeUYfYu0BjecDUMnYz6iDLgzBF3kewUWCSsGAQQB2kcPAQEHQK1IuW0GZmcrs2mx CYMl8IHse0tMF8cP7eBNXevrlx2ZiPUEGBYIACYCGwIWIQTEvC3bOMzpZIXr6cLyBpEXkDjlxgUC XeR7TwUJAiGl/gCBdiAEGRYIAB0WIQQsv6x2UaqQJzY+dXHEDyVUMvKBDwUCXeR7BQAKCRDEDyVU MvKBD7KmAQCHs+7588C4jto6fMje0Nu97zzoppjJM7lrGF2rVnbHvwD+MgmGUbHzPSUrTWnZBQDi /QM595bxNrBA4N1CiXhs2AMJEPIGkReQOOXGpp0BAM7YeBnt/UNvxJAGm4DidSfHU7RDMWe6Tgux HrH21cDkAQC9leNFXJsQ7F2ZniRPHa8CkictcQEKPL8VCWpfe8LbArg4BF3ke5wSCisGAQQBl1UB BQEBB0Cf+EiAXtntQMf51xpqb6uZ5O0eCLAZtkg0SXHjA1JlEwMBCAeIfgQYFggAJhYhBMS8Lds4 zOlkhevpwvIGkReQOOXGBQJd5HucAhsMBQkCIaVkAAoJEPIGkReQOOXGdYcBANYnW7VyL2CncKH1 iO4Zr0IwfdIv6rai1PUHL98pVi3cAP9tMh85CKGDa0Xi/fptQH41meollLW5tLb/bEWMuUNuBQ==
Date: Wed, 18 Nov 2020 13:15:16 -0500
Message-ID: <87ima2bkgb.fsf@fifthhorseman.net>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: multipart/signed; boundary="=-=-="; micalg="pgp-sha256"; protocol="application/pgp-signature"
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/tools-discuss/nItcBZ6YYn6CXlLbQCmpeGR0qDs>
Subject: [Tools-discuss] polls "show of hands": can we include a "i don't understand" or "not enough information" option
X-BeenThere: tools-discuss@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: IETF Tools Discussion <tools-discuss.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/tools-discuss>, <mailto:tools-discuss-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/tools-discuss/>
List-Post: <mailto:tools-discuss@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:tools-discuss-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/tools-discuss>, <mailto:tools-discuss-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 18 Nov 2020 19:05:27 -0000
Currently, when there's a show of hands in meetecho, there are two actions any participant can take: - raise my hand - do not raise my hand in my experience, if a meeting has 100 participants, you're lucky to get 50 that select either of the above options. At least half tend to give no response at all. There are two reasons to give neither response though: - the question is confusing, invalid, wrong, i didn't understand it, or i'm not sure of the answer - i am asleep/bored/not paying attention It'd be nice to be able to to distinguish between these two large classes of non-responding participants. This is akin to including an "N/A" or "Don't know" answer in a multiple choice survey. Could such a option be added? I don't want clutter with a dozen extra options, but it would be useful to know how many people are paying attention but object to the binary framing for whatever reason. --dkg
- Re: [Tools-discuss] polls "show of hands": can we… Spencer Dawkins at IETF
- [Tools-discuss] polls "show of hands": can we inc… Daniel Kahn Gillmor
- Re: [Tools-discuss] polls "show of hands": can we… Carsten Bormann
- Re: [Tools-discuss] polls "show of hands": can we… Bob Hinden
- Re: [Tools-discuss] polls "show of hands": can we… Eric Rescorla
- Re: [Tools-discuss] polls "show of hands": can we… Eric Rescorla
- Re: [Tools-discuss] polls "show of hands": can we… Daniel Kahn Gillmor
- Re: [Tools-discuss] polls "show of hands": can we… Martin Thomson
- Re: [Tools-discuss] polls "show of hands": can we… Michael Richardson
- Re: [Tools-discuss] polls "show of hands": can we… Michael Richardson
- Re: [Tools-discuss] polls "show of hands": can we… Bob Hinden
- Re: [Tools-discuss] polls "show of hands": can we… Meetecho IETF support
- Re: [Tools-discuss] polls "show of hands": can we… Brian E Carpenter