IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [Tools-discuss] SPF rejection of mail to chairs

Robert Sparks <rjsparks@nostrum.com> Fri, 20 December 2019 16:16 UTC

Return-Path: <rjsparks@nostrum.com>
X-Original-To: tools-discuss@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: tools-discuss@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 094EB120804 for <tools-discuss@ietfa.amsl.com>; Fri, 20 Dec 2019 08:16:09 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.979
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.979 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, T_SPF_HELO_PERMERROR=0.01, T_SPF_PERMERROR=0.01, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (1024-bit key) header.d=nostrum.com
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id zxHbEODsq9Yb for <tools-discuss@ietfa.amsl.com>; Fri, 20 Dec 2019 08:16:07 -0800 (PST)
Received: from nostrum.com (raven-v6.nostrum.com [IPv6:2001:470:d:1130::1]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 41EC312016E for <tools-discuss@ietf.org>; Fri, 20 Dec 2019 08:16:07 -0800 (PST)
Received: from unescapeable.local ([47.186.30.41]) (authenticated bits=0) by nostrum.com (8.15.2/8.15.2) with ESMTPSA id xBKGG4NS054718 (version=TLSv1.2 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 bits=128 verify=NO); Fri, 20 Dec 2019 10:16:05 -0600 (CST) (envelope-from rjsparks@nostrum.com)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=simple/simple; d=nostrum.com; s=default; t=1576858566; bh=Mnglp3BzoyLe3Kg9czVjzRWMzCFvNzJMkiCnova1YT0=; h=Subject:To:Cc:References:From:Date:In-Reply-To; b=cj4Yf29SSwCQW0MsZMHfU6X1JO7TBXaWuloY/TJwpYbKr2vtxtb/DANWC6l4GvhjK qX6206UT9R8ZsJjzCXRYFRRQtt1EJq4J8DrEjZ698XkjFhnU5ku3QJXeo4GFBlke+e pL72LlMWjAomjmZDNKOjLl9wQKEx5ZwuFFqM/CR0=
X-Authentication-Warning: raven.nostrum.com: Host [47.186.30.41] claimed to be unescapeable.local
To: Carsten Bormann <cabo@tzi.org>, tools-discuss@ietf.org
Cc: Michael Richardson <mcr+ietf@sandelman.ca>
References: <RT-Ticket-282330@www.ietf.org/rt> <20191121040335.A47AD120944@ietfa.amsl.com> <253406B7-7911-4971-9ED5-D836606D3B6A@tzi.org> <rt-4.4.2-17081-1574310971-201.282330-4-0@www.ietf.org/rt> <CABL0ig51Bfs5w94vnZnTBQaQ+mC5+Vjett61Cs1d0sc_DpFsXA@mail.gmail.com> <9898.1574329972@dooku.sandelman.ca> <A7C5D382-FDE4-4EB7-9463-FB2E0884920C@tzi.org>
From: Robert Sparks <rjsparks@nostrum.com>
Message-ID: <96dbab15-2b11-4114-8ad0-690047430d68@nostrum.com>
Date: Fri, 20 Dec 2019 10:16:04 -0600
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Macintosh; Intel Mac OS X 10.14; rv:60.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/60.9.1
MIME-Version: 1.0
In-Reply-To: <A7C5D382-FDE4-4EB7-9463-FB2E0884920C@tzi.org>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8"; format="flowed"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
Content-Language: en-US
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/tools-discuss/oEEQ3RjxcaTrtukoSrBgaWqP40w>
Subject: Re: [Tools-discuss] SPF rejection of mail to chairs
X-BeenThere: tools-discuss@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: IETF Tools Discussion <tools-discuss.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/tools-discuss>, <mailto:tools-discuss-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/tools-discuss/>
List-Post: <mailto:tools-discuss@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:tools-discuss-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/tools-discuss>, <mailto:tools-discuss-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 20 Dec 2019 16:16:09 -0000

Hi Carsten -

We're aware of this problem. Unfortunately there is not any quick fix 
for it.

The path through the mail processing chain for the aliases is very 
different than the path for the mailing lists, and the way we are 
applying the current workaround isn't applicable there.

We are discussing what we can do instead.

RjS

On 12/20/19 1:14 AM, Carsten Bormann wrote:
> On Nov 21, 2019, at 10:52, Michael Richardson <mcr+ietf@sandelman.ca> wrote:
>>> Is there a need for the DMARC hack for the chair aliases, too?
>> Oh crap, yes we do.
>> and on all of the Internet-draft author lists.
> Just fell into the trap again (on a draft…@ietf.org alias).
>
> Where do I need to report this bug to so it gets addressed?
>
> Grüße, Carsten
>
> ___________________________________________________________
> Tools-discuss mailing list
> Tools-discuss@ietf.org
> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/tools-discuss
>
> Please report datatracker.ietf.org and mailarchive.ietf.org
> bugs at http://tools.ietf.org/tools/ietfdb
> or send email to datatracker-project@ietf.org
>
> Please report tools.ietf.org bugs at
> http://tools.ietf.org/tools/issues
> or send email to webmaster@tools.ietf.org

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email