Re: [Tools-discuss] xml2rfc.ietf.org unavailable

Michael Richardson <mcr+ietf@sandelman.ca> Mon, 03 June 2019 22:14 UTC

Return-Path: <mcr+ietf@sandelman.ca>
X-Original-To: tools-discuss@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: tools-discuss@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 334D0120120 for <tools-discuss@ietfa.amsl.com>; Mon, 3 Jun 2019 15:14:29 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -0.44
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-0.44 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, RDNS_NONE=0.793, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_SOFTFAIL=0.665, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001] autolearn=no autolearn_force=no
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id OtNDZa9Num-4 for <tools-discuss@ietfa.amsl.com>; Mon, 3 Jun 2019 15:14:27 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from tuna.sandelman.ca (unknown [209.87.249.16]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher AECDH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id B32D71200FE for <tools-discuss@ietf.org>; Mon, 3 Jun 2019 15:14:27 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from sandelman.ca (unknown [IPv6:2607:f0b0:f:2:56b2:3ff:fe0b:d84]) by tuna.sandelman.ca (Postfix) with ESMTP id 712F5380BE; Mon, 3 Jun 2019 18:13:14 -0400 (EDT)
Received: by sandelman.ca (Postfix, from userid 179) id CC4B916A5; Mon, 3 Jun 2019 18:14:25 -0400 (EDT)
Received: from sandelman.ca (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by sandelman.ca (Postfix) with ESMTP id C78AEE69; Mon, 3 Jun 2019 18:14:25 -0400 (EDT)
From: Michael Richardson <mcr+ietf@sandelman.ca>
To: Carsten Bormann <cabo@tzi.org>
cc: tools-discuss@ietf.org
In-Reply-To: <F901F7B6-CB97-4D11-9F2B-A277B6BCA0A6@tzi.org>
References: <12561.1559579099@localhost> <F901F7B6-CB97-4D11-9F2B-A277B6BCA0A6@tzi.org>
X-Mailer: MH-E 8.6; nmh 1.7+dev; GNU Emacs 24.5.1
X-Face: $\n1pF)h^`}$H>Hk{L"x@)JS7<%Az}5RyS@k9X%29-lHB$Ti.V>2bi.~ehC0; <'$9xN5Ub# z!G,p`nR&p7Fz@^UXIn156S8.~^@MJ*mMsD7=QFeq%AL4m<nPbLgmtKK-5dC@#:k
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: multipart/signed; boundary="=-=-="; micalg="pgp-sha256"; protocol="application/pgp-signature"
Date: Mon, 03 Jun 2019 18:14:25 -0400
Message-ID: <8533.1559600065@localhost>
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/tools-discuss/pCevqNpY62Bdcc0UlYn_rEcTkp0>
Subject: Re: [Tools-discuss] xml2rfc.ietf.org unavailable
X-BeenThere: tools-discuss@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: IETF Tools Discussion <tools-discuss.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/tools-discuss>, <mailto:tools-discuss-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/tools-discuss/>
List-Post: <mailto:tools-discuss@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:tools-discuss-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/tools-discuss>, <mailto:tools-discuss-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 03 Jun 2019 22:14:29 -0000

Carsten Bormann <cabo@tzi.org> wrote:
    > Maybe I have said that before, but I seem to have better experiences
    > with getting bibxml from xml2rfc.tools.ietf.org over xml2rfc.ietf.org.

Oh. I was going to say that they are now aliases for each other, but they are
not.   xml2rfc.ietf.org is on cloudflare.

my xml2rfc was 2.9.6 (on my desktop), and it is now 2.22.3 after upgrade.
So maybe I'll talk to a different URL by default now.
(I could go look into the source, but this way, it's much more adventurous...)

--
Michael Richardson <mcr+IETF@sandelman.ca>, Sandelman Software Works
 -= IPv6 IoT consulting =-