[Tools-discuss] Idnits-2.16.02 feedback: -latest pattern
Carsten Bormann <cabo@tzi.org> Sat, 06 April 2019 16:43 UTC
Return-Path: <cabo@tzi.org>
X-Original-To: tools-discuss@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: tools-discuss@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0C1DB1201A9 for <tools-discuss@ietfa.amsl.com>; Sat, 6 Apr 2019 09:43:47 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -4.2
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-4.2 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_MED=-2.3] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id JVwDFo9f2P4p for <tools-discuss@ietfa.amsl.com>; Sat, 6 Apr 2019 09:43:44 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from smtp.uni-bremen.de (gabriel-vm-2.zfn.uni-bremen.de [134.102.50.17]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher AECDH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 7EE1B12008F for <tools-discuss@ietf.org>; Sat, 6 Apr 2019 09:43:44 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from client-0121.vpn.uni-bremen.de (client-0121.vpn.uni-bremen.de [134.102.107.121]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by smtp.uni-bremen.de (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 44c2Z63nxmzytY; Sat, 6 Apr 2019 18:43:42 +0200 (CEST)
From: Carsten Bormann <cabo@tzi.org>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8"
X-Mao-Original-Outgoing-Id: 576261817.207726-b591d8ae15e529de80adad359e72b8d1
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Mime-Version: 1.0 (Mac OS X Mail 11.5 \(3445.9.1\))
Date: Sat, 06 Apr 2019 18:43:41 +0200
Message-Id: <F4EFC3A3-BBC7-44D9-9205-ED60EE7863AA@tzi.org>
To: tools-discuss <tools-discuss@ietf.org>
X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.3445.9.1)
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/tools-discuss/q-ej_WASRnmoz86FQcD54ZACJZk>
Subject: [Tools-discuss] Idnits-2.16.02 feedback: -latest pattern
X-BeenThere: tools-discuss@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: IETF Tools Discussion <tools-discuss.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/tools-discuss>, <mailto:tools-discuss-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/tools-discuss/>
List-Post: <mailto:tools-discuss@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:tools-discuss-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/tools-discuss>, <mailto:tools-discuss-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Sat, 06 Apr 2019 16:43:47 -0000
Idnits should recognize the -latest pattern that Martin Thomson’s template uses and turn these four messages into one (or maybe even fix the fourth, because that very much can be figured out based on the pattern): Grüße, Carsten Checking nits according to https://www.ietf.org/id-info/1id-guidelines.txt: ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- ** Missing revision: the document name given in the document, 'draft-ietf-core-multipart-ct-latest', does not give the document revision number ~~ Missing draftname component: the document name given in the document, 'draft-ietf-core-multipart-ct-latest', does not seem to contain all the document name components required ('draft' prefix, document source, document name, and revision) -- see https://www.ietf.org/id-info/guidelines#naming for more information. == Mismatching filename: the document gives the document name as 'draft-ietf-core-multipart-ct-latest', but the file name used is 'draft-ietf-core-multipart-ct' Miscellaneous warnings: ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- == Couldn't figure out when the document was first submitted -- there may comments or warnings related to the use of a disclaimer for pre-RFC5378 work that could not be issued because of this. Please check the Legal Provisions document at https://trustee.ietf.org/license-info to determine if you need the pre-RFC5378 disclaimer.
- [Tools-discuss] Idnits-2.16.02 feedback: -latest … Carsten Bormann
- Re: [Tools-discuss] Idnits-2.16.02 feedback: -lat… Henrik Levkowetz
- Re: [Tools-discuss] Idnits-2.16.02 feedback: -lat… Carsten Bormann
- Re: [Tools-discuss] Idnits-2.16.02 feedback: -lat… Tom Pusateri
- Re: [Tools-discuss] Idnits-2.16.02 feedback: -lat… Carsten Bormann