IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [Tools-discuss] [Cellar] I-D Action: draft-ietf-cellar-ebml-12.txt

Dave Rice <dave@dericed.com> Mon, 21 October 2019 18:22 UTC

Return-Path: <dave@dericed.com>
X-Original-To: tools-discuss@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: tools-discuss@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7C48B1201DB; Mon, 21 Oct 2019 11:22:30 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.109
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.109 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE=-0.0001, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_NEUTRAL=0.779, T_HTML_ATTACH=0.01] autolearn=no autolearn_force=no
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id x08mwcrOQZ3V; Mon, 21 Oct 2019 11:22:18 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from server172-3.web-hosting.com (server172-3.web-hosting.com [68.65.122.111]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 88722120108; Mon, 21 Oct 2019 11:22:18 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from [146.96.19.240] (port=50482 helo=[10.10.201.23]) by server172.web-hosting.com with esmtpsa (TLSv1.2:ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384:256) (Exim 4.92) (envelope-from <dave@dericed.com>) id 1iMcJs-004JSE-AA; Mon, 21 Oct 2019 14:22:17 -0400
From: Dave Rice <dave@dericed.com>
Message-Id: <ECF02FF9-B2F3-4493-89B8-3B31777D4990@dericed.com>
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="Apple-Mail=_826F171C-452B-41F2-8E91-66701F5AD401"
Mime-Version: 1.0 (Mac OS X Mail 12.4 \(3445.104.8\))
Date: Mon, 21 Oct 2019 14:22:10 -0400
In-Reply-To: <2259.1571680217@localhost>
Cc: cellar@ietf.org, tools-discuss@ietf.org
To: Michael Richardson <mcr@sandelman.ca>
References: <157167166904.31800.14436237517062444902@ietfa.amsl.com> <2259.1571680217@localhost>
X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.3445.104.8)
X-AntiAbuse: This header was added to track abuse, please include it with any abuse report
X-AntiAbuse: Primary Hostname - server172.web-hosting.com
X-AntiAbuse: Original Domain - ietf.org
X-AntiAbuse: Originator/Caller UID/GID - [47 12] / [47 12]
X-AntiAbuse: Sender Address Domain - dericed.com
X-Get-Message-Sender-Via: server172.web-hosting.com: authenticated_id: dave@dericed.com
X-Authenticated-Sender: server172.web-hosting.com: dave@dericed.com
X-Source:
X-Source-Args:
X-Source-Dir:
X-From-Rewrite: unmodified, already matched
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/tools-discuss/qWZtjA3p1qmh9kNd7Cvs2eKlxfY>
X-Mailman-Approved-At: Mon, 21 Oct 2019 11:24:19 -0700
Subject: Re: [Tools-discuss] [Cellar] I-D Action: draft-ietf-cellar-ebml-12.txt
X-BeenThere: tools-discuss@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: IETF Tools Discussion <tools-discuss.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/tools-discuss>, <mailto:tools-discuss-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/tools-discuss/>
List-Post: <mailto:tools-discuss@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:tools-discuss-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/tools-discuss>, <mailto:tools-discuss-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 21 Oct 2019 18:22:34 -0000

Hi Michael,

> On Oct 21, 2019, at 1:50 PM, Michael Richardson <mcr@sandelman.ca> wrote:
> 
> 
> Dave, is ebml in XML v3, uploaded as such?

It was uploaded via https://datatracker.ietf.org/submit/ <https://datatracker.ietf.org/submit/>.

> Were the txt and HTML generated by you or the datatracker?

With xml2rfc 2.32.0 locally the files look ok, I’m attaching them.

I haven’t tested but in the XML within the <sourcecode> we have 0x0A for line breaks. I wonder if an 0x0d (carriage return) would make a difference, though I feel guilty using up version numbers just to test that.

>> A diff from the previous version is available at:
>> https://www.ietf.org/rfcdiff?url2=draft-ietf-cellar-ebml-12
> 
> looking at the diff of the txt, there are a bunch of relative references which did not
> get expanded correctly from the markdown:
> 
>    unknownsizeallowed attribute (#unknownsizeallowed)).

I’ll address that separately.

> Looks like a tooling issue somewhere.
> Looking at this:
>  https://www.ietf.org/id/draft-ietf-cellar-ebml-12.html
> 
> I don't see #unknownsizeallowed in the same way, but the reference that is
> generated looks off to me.
> 
> --
> ]               Never tell me the odds!                 | ipv6 mesh networks [
> ]   Michael Richardson, Sandelman Software Works        |    IoT architect   [
> ]     mcr@sandelman.ca  http://www.sandelman.ca/        |   ruby on rails    [
> 
>

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email