IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [Tools-discuss] Setting Reply-To

Robert Sparks <rjsparks@nostrum.com> Wed, 28 October 2020 17:19 UTC

Return-Path: <rjsparks@nostrum.com>
X-Original-To: tools-discuss@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: tools-discuss@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4DFA13A09E1 for <tools-discuss@ietfa.amsl.com>; Wed, 28 Oct 2020 10:19:45 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2.325
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.325 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_EF=-0.1, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, NICE_REPLY_A=-0.247, T_SPF_HELO_PERMERROR=0.01, T_SPF_PERMERROR=0.01, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (1024-bit key) header.d=nostrum.com
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id hSjoFCqIHTJR for <tools-discuss@ietfa.amsl.com>; Wed, 28 Oct 2020 10:19:43 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from nostrum.com (raven-v6.nostrum.com [IPv6:2001:470:d:1130::1]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id BE7DD3A09E0 for <tools-discuss@ietf.org>; Wed, 28 Oct 2020 10:19:43 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from unescapeable.local ([47.186.30.41]) (authenticated bits=0) by nostrum.com (8.16.1/8.16.1) with ESMTPSA id 09SHJg91063633 (version=TLSv1.3 cipher=TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 bits=256 verify=NO) for <tools-discuss@ietf.org>; Wed, 28 Oct 2020 12:19:42 -0500 (CDT) (envelope-from rjsparks@nostrum.com)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=simple/simple; d=nostrum.com; s=default; t=1603905583; bh=jUtBMYigeaJcU1LTjB/Unlmeaap0XIntBxgQ+OSl3G8=; h=To:References:From:Subject:Date:In-Reply-To; b=ks+FyYOH/WlOwatglp667Hr18FF055u+HjZuT/g2GoJ+1NG+ievsMDud0jyBUqx6E I/7Kv3/vB/+ew+sUcuRWBYdN2iiEWlvoMO3HXYr/umcZuD5+JyOt3w3ftmU8Enz7FQ TTOf2FrIemrwkb/JjMetN8Zmi8128Ci2xiq1x+D8=
X-Authentication-Warning: raven.nostrum.com: Host [47.186.30.41] claimed to be unescapeable.local
To: tools-discuss@ietf.org
References: <20201026181442.GA2438@faui48f.informatik.uni-erlangen.de> <CAMm+LwiVmE=qtSPCMD-3foPODL8bgETj3dQDKS-3BOM2021dEg@mail.gmail.com> <CADaq8jdSeTDWy_0fCV25ykxKFMV1ZBtUMMNesoOuaXCzFVfpOA@mail.gmail.com> <D2D0455D-8D6C-4A19-ACAE-4DD972D83DC1@bluepopcorn.net> <7caa5bed-febc-dc71-ec0f-b4d4e951e01a@nostrum.com> <380F930D-96CA-4868-9001-5DC6C1157AA5@tzi.org> <12c95563-8f0e-736f-d15b-61307c42e681@nostrum.com> <de508f23f6ae0b8557f5371d5cd78234.squirrel@mail2.ihtfp.org> <25861.1603904469@localhost>
From: Robert Sparks <rjsparks@nostrum.com>
Message-ID: <a97b81c5-761a-6de4-8401-972eb18c6171@nostrum.com>
Date: Wed, 28 Oct 2020 12:19:42 -0500
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Macintosh; Intel Mac OS X 10.14; rv:78.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/78.4.0
MIME-Version: 1.0
In-Reply-To: <25861.1603904469@localhost>
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="------------E4BA2D06CACD6EAFCC5260B1"
Content-Language: en-US
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/tools-discuss/qjLGN_ZfzSPLWc810ugcDzqjuoU>
Subject: Re: [Tools-discuss] Setting Reply-To
X-BeenThere: tools-discuss@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: IETF Tools Discussion <tools-discuss.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/tools-discuss>, <mailto:tools-discuss-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/tools-discuss/>
List-Post: <mailto:tools-discuss@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:tools-discuss-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/tools-discuss>, <mailto:tools-discuss-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 28 Oct 2020 17:19:45 -0000

On 10/28/20 12:01 PM, Michael Richardson wrote:
> Derek Atkins <derek@ihtfp.com> wrote:
>      > My received version has this header:
>
>      > Reply-To: "tools-discuss@ietf.org" <tools-discuss@ietf.org>
>
>      > I did "Reply-All"
>
> I also got it.
>
> But I definitely have seen it disappear on other lists.
> Forced reply to list is a mailman settings, perhaps we have inconsistent list
> settings.

I looked and there are only 3 lists currently configured to remove 
reply-to (quic-issues, venue-selection, and wax).

There are only a small set of lists that use forced reply (mailman's 
reply_goes_to_list setting), like i-d-announce, usually to send replies 
somewhere else.

Please watch for the disappearing you've seen and report it when you see 
it. I'm not finding anything that would cause that in the current 
processing chain.

RjS


>
> --
> Michael Richardson <mcr+IETF@sandelman.ca>   . o O ( IPv6 IøT consulting )
>             Sandelman Software Works Inc, Ottawa and Worldwide
>
>
>
>
>
> ___________________________________________________________
> Tools-discuss mailing list
> Tools-discuss@ietf.org
> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/tools-discuss
>
> Please report datatracker.ietf.org and mailarchive.ietf.org
> bugs at http://tools.ietf.org/tools/ietfdb
> or send email to datatracker-project@ietf.org
>
> Please report tools.ietf.org bugs at
> http://tools.ietf.org/tools/issues
> or send email to webmaster@tools.ietf.org

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email