IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [Tools-discuss] Rfcdiff v 0.12 feedback

Carsten Bormann <cabo@tzi.org> Tue, 01 June 2021 21:59 UTC

Return-Path: <cabo@tzi.org>
X-Original-To: tools-discuss@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: tools-discuss@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id C4A4A3A28EC; Tue, 1 Jun 2021 14:59:19 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.899
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.899 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id HQtmKFhfsfsB; Tue, 1 Jun 2021 14:59:15 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from gabriel-2.zfn.uni-bremen.de (gabriel-2.zfn.uni-bremen.de [134.102.50.19]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ADH-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 4CC7A3A28E8; Tue, 1 Jun 2021 14:59:15 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from [192.168.217.118] (p548dcc89.dip0.t-ipconnect.de [84.141.204.137]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by gabriel-2.zfn.uni-bremen.de (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 4FvmJw6TXhz316D; Tue, 1 Jun 2021 23:59:12 +0200 (CEST)
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8"
Mime-Version: 1.0 (Mac OS X Mail 13.4 \(3608.120.23.2.7\))
From: Carsten Bormann <cabo@tzi.org>
In-Reply-To: <B947FB94-9C85-46BF-B77D-53110DC85689@ietf.org>
Date: Tue, 01 Jun 2021 23:59:12 +0200
Cc: Donald Eastlake <d3e3e3@gmail.com>, tools-discuss@ietf.org
X-Mao-Original-Outgoing-Id: 644277552.5893199-157d5a7bf4f438dcd9b06c6226b53c13
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Message-Id: <B26A3FCC-6204-4819-8B70-9668A9384D04@tzi.org>
References: <CAF4+nEGM5Q5sq5Tn5xtPi9FvSyy2cMYC+bZxp2y9bkT39ttheA@mail.gmail.com> <10C19260-EBAF-41EC-B4FE-BBF23919D84D@tzi.org> <B947FB94-9C85-46BF-B77D-53110DC85689@ietf.org>
To: Jay Daley <jay@ietf.org>
X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.3608.120.23.2.7)
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/tools-discuss/qt0Ah8x5NyPjjBfb9Ci6T1tEMeU>
Subject: Re: [Tools-discuss] Rfcdiff v 0.12 feedback
X-BeenThere: tools-discuss@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: IETF Tools Discussion <tools-discuss.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/tools-discuss>, <mailto:tools-discuss-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/tools-discuss/>
List-Post: <mailto:tools-discuss@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:tools-discuss-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/tools-discuss>, <mailto:tools-discuss-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 01 Jun 2021 21:59:20 -0000

On 2021-06-01, at 21:26, Jay Daley <jay@ietf.org> wrote:
> 
> So that I’m clear - do you want to bookmark the GET in order to repeat the same diff?  In other words, if the result was stored indefinitely and a bookmarkable URL returned then would that be sufficient for you?  (not designing things here, just trying to understand the use case).

Not quite, because the file at one of the URLs might change.

Grüße, Carsten

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email