[Tools-discuss] UTF-8 box characters with wavy lines in XML2RFC v3 draft

Tom Pusateri <pusateri@bangj.com> Wed, 06 November 2019 01:21 UTC

Return-Path: <pusateri@bangj.com>
X-Original-To: tools-discuss@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: tools-discuss@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost []) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 03B8A12006E for <tools-discuss@ietfa.amsl.com>; Tue, 5 Nov 2019 17:21:14 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=bangj.com
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com []) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id L3hmm_kUHzL3 for <tools-discuss@ietfa.amsl.com>; Tue, 5 Nov 2019 17:21:12 -0800 (PST)
Received: from oj.bangj.com (69-77-154-174.static.skybest.com []) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher AECDH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id E44AA120041 for <tools-discuss@ietf.org>; Tue, 5 Nov 2019 17:21:11 -0800 (PST)
Received: from [] (mta-107-13-246-59.nc.rr.com []) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by oj.bangj.com (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 7E5972D75F for <tools-discuss@ietf.org>; Tue, 5 Nov 2019 20:21:10 -0500 (EST)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=bangj.com; s=201907; t=1573003270; bh=HsGialJIJSKTICqlBb2wCW3embA7KI6qJ1JxG1gElu8=; h=From:Subject:References:To:Date:From; b=Arh1IggNiQ40FbhC0Gujz4dXB7/nLBE1SrZ5jXOVQbcD3q316STLN8B+pNEC8TFQQ NUTpZ86x6p0eLnWCo6wYjPragInohGxc/8CQw6H7hSePuUEBCNypZf/Y2sqPWpqWdp rptAZokC6/+DpTMm1TkGGzgppMlapBP+nsidy7+vEGd6H4ciMDano2+ZFIvznadybG LS6LNObIMLNdB82Zgi+M+Y8T+RWOUV25zb1dWtfS/Phoadd1mFWMC25BJIfROKgKrw cYe/3h5KijK0vQltALTwvN5dGWerj+Ns2HNcBSj8Kcq8tG8RRkeyc5zD/jUayYvkcZ FrtGJ2VN/c6aw==
From: Tom Pusateri <pusateri@bangj.com>
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="Apple-Mail=_5EB8E300-835E-4747-B93B-1064C42BEC68"
Mime-Version: 1.0 (Mac OS X Mail 13.0 \(3601.0.10\))
Message-Id: <E2A5257F-8926-4570-81E1-288DDDC6DA34@bangj.com>
References: <157288484424.16663.3995065379449438987.idtracker@ietfa.amsl.com>
To: tools-discuss <tools-discuss@ietf.org>
Date: Tue, 5 Nov 2019 20:21:09 -0500
X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.3601.0.10)
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/tools-discuss/r0J7dMXSUnH3iVj4Q2vaqzcc_v0>
Subject: [Tools-discuss] UTF-8 box characters with wavy lines in XML2RFC v3 draft
X-BeenThere: tools-discuss@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: IETF Tools Discussion <tools-discuss.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/tools-discuss>, <mailto:tools-discuss-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/tools-discuss/>
List-Post: <mailto:tools-discuss@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:tools-discuss-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/tools-discuss>, <mailto:tools-discuss-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 06 Nov 2019 01:21:14 -0000

	As a follow up to DKG’s comments about v3 submissions and UTF-8 box characters, we recently submitted this draft.

We did get the new v3 HTML version referenced in the document datatracker if you click the “status” link below, you will see the first HTML link is the new version.
We also got the old HTML version using the htmlized link in the document datatracker. This seems unnecessary to me.

But below, you see two htmlized links in the outgoing email and neither of these refer to the new v3 HTML version.

I would like to see both of these links removed and replaced with a link to the v3 HTML version in the announcement email.

Also, note how the box characters in the v3 HTML version end up are unaligned? There is probably something going wrong here in the CSS or maybe our source but I’m not sure what. Maybe we’re not using the correct vertical bar? Any help on that would be appreciated so we don’t get wavy lines.


> Begin forwarded message:
> From: internet-drafts@ietf.org
> Subject: New Version Notification for draft-pusateri-dnsop-update-timeout-04.txt
> Date: November 4, 2019 at 11:27:24 AM EST
> To: "Tim Wattenberg" <mail@timwattenberg.de>de>, "Tom Pusateri" <pusateri@bangj.com>
> A new version of I-D, draft-pusateri-dnsop-update-timeout-04.txt
> has been successfully submitted by Tim Wattenberg and posted to the
> IETF repository.
> Name:		draft-pusateri-dnsop-update-timeout
> Revision:	04
> Title:		DNS TIMEOUT Resource Record
> Document date:	2019-11-04
> Group:		Individual Submission
> Pages:		17
> URL:            https://www.ietf.org/internet-drafts/draft-pusateri-dnsop-update-timeout-04.txt
> Status:         https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-pusateri-dnsop-update-timeout/
> Htmlized:       https://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-pusateri-dnsop-update-timeout-04
> Htmlized:       https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/html/draft-pusateri-dnsop-update-timeout
> Diff:           https://www.ietf.org/rfcdiff?url2=draft-pusateri-dnsop-update-timeout-04
> Abstract:
>   This specification defines a new DNS TIMEOUT resource record (RR)
>   that associates a lifetime with one or more zone resource records.
>   It is intended to be used to transfer resource record lifetime state
>   between a zone's primary and secondary servers and to store lifetime
>   state during server software restarts.
> Please note that it may take a couple of minutes from the time of submission
> until the htmlized version and diff are available at tools.ietf.org.
> The IETF Secretariat