Re: [Tools-discuss] Changes in 'https://datatracker.ietf.org/person/Michael%20Richardson'

Michael Richardson <mcr+ietf@sandelman.ca> Thu, 27 May 2021 15:42 UTC

Return-Path: <mcr@sandelman.ca>
X-Original-To: tools-discuss@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: tools-discuss@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 59C473A13D4 for <tools-discuss@ietfa.amsl.com>; Thu, 27 May 2021 08:42:43 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.232
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.232 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_BLOCKED=0.001, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_SOFTFAIL=0.665, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001] autolearn=no autolearn_force=no
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id kXsMtaZ5ye8z for <tools-discuss@ietfa.amsl.com>; Thu, 27 May 2021 08:42:39 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from relay.sandelman.ca (minerva.sandelman.ca [IPv6:2a01:7e00::3d:b000]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ADH-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 595D63A13D3 for <tools-discuss@ietf.org>; Thu, 27 May 2021 08:42:39 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from dooku.sandelman.ca (desktop4.sandelman.ca [209.87.249.16]) by relay.sandelman.ca (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 9F09D1F47D for <tools-discuss@ietf.org>; Thu, 27 May 2021 15:42:37 +0000 (UTC)
Received: by dooku.sandelman.ca (Postfix, from userid 179) id 8261A1A02B1; Thu, 27 May 2021 11:42:36 -0400 (EDT)
From: Michael Richardson <mcr+ietf@sandelman.ca>
To: tools-discuss@ietf.org
In-reply-to: <E1llum9-0004g9-1e@bolinkje.followthatpage.com>
References: <E1llum9-0004g9-1e@bolinkje.followthatpage.com>
Comments: In-reply-to "Follow That Page" <support@followthatpage.com> message dated "Wed, 26 May 2021 16:44:49 +0200."
X-Mailer: MH-E 8.6+git; nmh 1.7.1; GNU Emacs 26.3
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: multipart/signed; boundary="=-=-="; micalg="pgp-sha512"; protocol="application/pgp-signature"
Date: Thu, 27 May 2021 11:42:36 -0400
Message-ID: <32981.1622130156@dooku>
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/tools-discuss/r2dxXjNuvLNnjFkLEukz32hjEnk>
Subject: Re: [Tools-discuss] Changes in 'https://datatracker.ietf.org/person/Michael%20Richardson'
X-BeenThere: tools-discuss@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: IETF Tools Discussion <tools-discuss.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/tools-discuss>, <mailto:tools-discuss-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/tools-discuss/>
List-Post: <mailto:tools-discuss@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:tools-discuss-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/tools-discuss>, <mailto:tools-discuss-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 27 May 2021 15:42:43 -0000

Hi, so RFC8995 just go published, and so my profile page was updated.
I was surprised to see:

+    rfc8995 May 2021 Bootstrapping Remote Secure Key Infrastructure (BRSKI)
+    Cited by 13 RFCs

13? Already? Since Friday? WOW.
Surely, that's not correct.
Some of the citations are informative references from existing RFCs to the ID.
The DT maps that through to the RFC... okay.

I wonder if that should be split up as normative references (from RFCs),
informative references (from RFCs), and references from IDs?

-- 
]               Never tell me the odds!                 | ipv6 mesh networks [ 
]   Michael Richardson, Sandelman Software Works        | network architect  [ 
]     mcr@sandelman.ca  http://www.sandelman.ca/        |   ruby on rails    [